Of course he'll be gone in 3-5 years, he's in his 60s and is here for his experience; that's the going-in plan. I agree with your "systemic" assessment, but do not have the same binary pessimism. The more salient point, IMO, is that as important as Eng's role is, he cannot do it alone. The governor's administration, MaDOT, the stakeholder cities, advocacy groups, and even the Feds, need to join forces to fix this. The question is whether the rest of the stakeholders care enough, and whether Eng is capable of being an orchestrator. It is an extraordinary challenge, but not a forgone conclusion it will fail. To me, an even more important lynchpin is the Healey administration; that's where the resources ultimately come from, and that's where the leverage to influence components of the constituency come from. More of this frustration should be directed that way, IMO.