Perhaps we go this week with no announcement if that "November" date is still holding from officials? The deafening silence all last week and so far this week; only word of mouth. Already full week into the month.
This week is a 4 day week due to the Friday holiday, so we're already halfway into the 2nd week of November.
I doubt the test trains will stop on Friday.Perhaps we go this week with no announcement if that "November" date is still holding from officials? The deafening silence all last week and so far this week; only word of mouth. Already full week into the month.
This week is a 4 day week due to the Friday holiday, so we're already halfway into the 2nd week of November.
Heading west from Gilman this morning
My favorite thing is how the MBTA signs trains heading inbound from Medford and all GLX stations into downtown as "COPLEY & WEST", even though the trains are heading due eastwards to get from Medford/Union Square into Downtown Boston inbound. It is not until Lechmere Station that the trains are finally east of Copley station and where Copley station is finally "West" of it's position.
Typical practice for railroads to have only two directions (east-west or north-south), helps eliminate confusion given that (as you noted) lines can go in various actual directions during their run. The Green Line's typically been eastbound-westbound, which made a lot of sense given that most of the network, and all of the branches, were at the western end prior to the GLX.
As for the specific signage, within the past ten or so years they've moved away from their former practice of using "Inbound" and "Outbound" designations in favor of more directions and 'landmark' stations, presumably because it's less confusing to non-regular riders. (Under the old system, you could board an inbound train at Lechmere heading for Copley...or at Copley heading for Lechmere, Park and Government Center being where everything inbound was headed and everything going away from them being outbound. The "Copley & West" designation (like its opposite-direction counterpart "North Station & North") is essentially a short version of [to] Copley & [points] West [of Copley]. I get why they chucked the old In/Outbound paradigm, but I don't necessarily think the current one is free from confusion and oddities.
Yea. The Green Line is kind of hard to define since all trains run in all 4 cardinal directions in a single direction, regardless of the branch, unlike the Red, Blue, and Orange lines, which mostly run North - South.
I just realized looking at the map again, the entire Huntington Ave E branch lies completely to the east of Medford station at the terminal of the Medford branch. As such, E trains have a longer western leg north of Government Center into Somerville, than it does south of Government Center into Huntington Ave., which is a shorter "western leg" compared to the Somerville/Medford portion of the route.
I haven’t figured out what the random cables are lying on the ties alongside the rail. They appear to be large gauge, but that makes no sense for their temporary appearance.
Yea. The Green Line is kind of hard to define since all trains run in all 4 cardinal directions in a single direction, regardless of the branch, unlike the Red, Blue, and Orange lines, which mostly run North - South.
I just realized looking at the map again, the entire Huntington Ave E branch lies completely to the east of Medford station at the terminal of the Medford branch. As such, E trains have a longer western leg north of Government Center into Somerville, than it does south of Government Center into Huntington Ave., which is a shorter "western leg" compared to the Somerville/Medford portion of the route.
They're the power cords for the trains in case the catenary system stops working. The T has taken past lessons to heart about always having a backup plan
That's correct....the running rail is the negative return. Explainer: http://www.railway-technical.com/infrastructure/electric-traction-power.htmlI thought the rail was the negative return path, with a short length of cable at the traction power substation. The haphazard way they are laid alongside the track, if they are the negative return, is a recipe for failure.
Return
What about the electrical return? There has to be a complete circuit, from the source of the energy out to the consuming item (light bulb, cooking stove or train) and back to the source, so a return conductor is needed for our railway. Simple – use the steel rails the wheels run on. Provided precautions are taken to prevent the voltage getting too high above the zero of the ground, it works very well and has done so for the last century. Of course, as many railways use the running rails for signalling circuits as well, special precautions have to be taken to protect them from interference.
The power circuit on the train is completed by connecting the return to brushes rubbing on the axle ends. The wheels, being steel, take it to the running rails. These are wired into the substation supplying the power and that does the job. The same technique is used for DC or AC overhead line supplies.
I'm pretty sure bigpicture7 was joking (given the not-infrequent Green Line catenary/power problems).I was hoping someone with more knowledge about traction power than me would have responded by now but your are so totally wrong. This is what is known as a "negative return cable" . Search google if you wish but good luck.