Green Line Type 10 Procurement

Thinking a little more about the maintenance rationale for the window design: Do other transit systems with the more stock Urbos design not suffer from window issues at the same rate as the T? How do they handle the maintenance? Why can’t the T handle newer window systems like the Urbos?
They did mention commonality. It's possible other systems with the Urbos don't have large heavy rail fleets. North American deployments were in Calgary, Cincinnati, KC, and Seattle, none of which have metro-style vehicles.

What a pleasure it is to look up an MBTA vehicle model and see a long list of international users on Wikipedia...
 
How much cross-pollination happens between the various fleet maintenance facilities? Each fleet has its own facility and none of the lines share fleets.
 
What happens to these mockups when they're no longer needed? Just scrapped? Seems like it would make a great exhibit for a children's museum, or at least someone's super sick Densha De Go setup.

I think that the mockup will be taken someplace & put on display. I remember the Type 6 mockup. It was given to the Seashore Trolley Museum.:(
Type 6 Mockup..jpg
 
Last edited:
How much cross-pollination happens between the various fleet maintenance facilities? Each fleet has its own facility and none of the lines share fleets.
The parts warehouse is consolidated across the rapid transit division, so there is a degree of maintenance centralization for keeping replacement parts in-stock.
 
Do the GL trains use the same window units or parts as any other equipment?
 
Do the GL trains use the same window units or parts as any other equipment?
The window sizes would be custom for each rolling stock make, but things like the rubber sealers and general methods of window replacement are probably standardized so they have a (weak) argument for staying with what they've always done for window selection on the Type 10's. Plenty of other components are commodity, though...especially with the mechanical guts. The Orange/Red CRRC cars and CAF Type 9's all use Mitsubishi Electric propulsion, for example, so a lot of those parts are completely common.
 
That makes a lot more sense. Standardizing the running gear is good. Sticking with the window and body systems that they know seems less of a concrete good.
 
So are the red bars on some doors meant to represent that those will be light bars that blink red when the door opens?
 
Not a fan of the lower case lettering on the electronic sign. With that said, I’m not too concerned as it’s a mockup.
 
In my humble opinion, the Sydney trams seem so much nicer and more sleek than the MBTA Type 10

View attachment 57557

When it comes to the MBTA, it's not about looks, but rather it's about money. They are going to go with the cheapest thing that availibe. Sorry, but that is how they are. Like with the new Red & Orange Line cars, they could've gone for somethging that costs a little bit more, but they didn't. instead, they opted for cheaper equipment & got themselves in some serious hot water, what with all those damn delays in getting the stuff delivered. Nope, their main worry is mow much it costs. The new trains look nice, but when a co, does not follow proper procedures in making sure that quality & deliveries are #1 then that causes problems after problems after problems. The new Orange Line cars just kept on breakin down multiple times!! I surely hope that the Type 10's don't have that problem!! :eek:
 
When it comes to the MBTA, it's not about looks, but rather it's about money. They are going to go with the cheapest thing that availibe. Sorry, but that is how they are. Like with the new Red & Orange Line cars, they could've gone for somethging that costs a little bit more, but they didn't. instead, they opted for cheaper equipment & got themselves in some serious hot water, what with all those damn delays in getting the stuff delivered. Nope, their main worry is mow much it costs. The new trains look nice, but when a co, does not follow proper procedures in making sure that quality & deliveries are #1 then that causes problems after problems after problems. The new Orange Line cars just kept on breakin down multiple times!! I surely hope that the Type 10's don't have that problem!! :eek:
I don’t want to jinx it, but the type 9 delivery went fine, I trust CAF for the type 10 delivery to go well.
 
When it comes to the MBTA, it's not about looks, but rather it's about money. They are going to go with the cheapest thing that availibe. Sorry, but that is how they are. Like with the new Red & Orange Line cars, they could've gone for somethging that costs a little bit more, but they didn't. instead, they opted for cheaper equipment & got themselves in some serious hot water, what with all those damn delays in getting the stuff delivered. Nope, their main worry is mow much it costs. The new trains look nice, but when a co, does not follow proper procedures in making sure that quality & deliveries are #1 then that causes problems after problems after problems. The new Orange Line cars just kept on breakin down multiple times!! I surely hope that the Type 10's don't have that problem!! :eek:

It's probably not an MBTA thing, but more of an American thing. Europe, Canada, and Australia just seem to have more respect for good design. :)
 
I don't like those seats!! The backs are fine, but where you sit, it just isn't enough room there. Makes me feel like I'm gonna slide off!! Barely enough room for your butt to sit on!!!! :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
 
Last edited:

Back
Top