quadratdackel
Active Member
- Joined
- May 26, 2006
- Messages
- 145
- Reaction score
- 0
First, a few words on where I've been these last few months. (Nice to know I've been missed.) I'm switching from Northeastern's electrical engineering program to the geography PhD program at Penn State. It's an exciting professional move for me, but it means I'll be moving to rural central Pennsylvania. To ease my transition, I forced myself to tame my enthusiasm for the city, which included abstaining from this forum. By now, I'm mentally prepared, so I can post here freely again (although I probably won't be super-active as I've got too many other projects underway).
So... I'm preparing an essay with my thoughts on Boston as an outgoing resident. I could use your help on two parts:
1) A main part of my argument is that Boston could have much more development (as measured in, say, square feet of floor space) if it wasn't so NIMBYish and beholden to the NIMBYs in the development process. This was a big theme when I was active last year, but by now I'm out of touch. Is this just as true now as it was then (or more true or less)? What are some good recent examples of NIMBYs delaying, shrinking, or killing local development, especially high-density mixed-use development, or good examples of such development breezing through the process? Also, has the Patrick administration brought any change in direction on this?
2) Ideas for getting this published. I'd ideally like this to be an opinion piece in the Globe, but I imagine that's a competitive space. If anyone has thoughts on that or knows anyone at the Globe I can discuss this with to see if it's a good fit, that'd be great. Alternatively, any suggestions for other outlets for publishing? I'd be tying the NIMBY/development bit to thoughts on affordable housing, personal health, and climate change, mixed with my own personal experience.
So... I'm preparing an essay with my thoughts on Boston as an outgoing resident. I could use your help on two parts:
1) A main part of my argument is that Boston could have much more development (as measured in, say, square feet of floor space) if it wasn't so NIMBYish and beholden to the NIMBYs in the development process. This was a big theme when I was active last year, but by now I'm out of touch. Is this just as true now as it was then (or more true or less)? What are some good recent examples of NIMBYs delaying, shrinking, or killing local development, especially high-density mixed-use development, or good examples of such development breezing through the process? Also, has the Patrick administration brought any change in direction on this?
2) Ideas for getting this published. I'd ideally like this to be an opinion piece in the Globe, but I imagine that's a competitive space. If anyone has thoughts on that or knows anyone at the Globe I can discuss this with to see if it's a good fit, that'd be great. Alternatively, any suggestions for other outlets for publishing? I'd be tying the NIMBY/development bit to thoughts on affordable housing, personal health, and climate change, mixed with my own personal experience.