stick n move
Superstar
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2009
- Messages
- 13,512
- Reaction score
- 24,681
Are we going to learn the lessons from this?“The MBTA completed the fastest permanent station construction project in its history.
You must be new here.Are we going to learn the lessons from this?
Lessons? Like controlling costs for once in their useless lives and not breaking state laws because they were in such a terrible rush?Are we going to learn the lessons from this?
Well that's the kind of lesson I would want to be learned. That maybe said state law, just like many local ordinances we all regularly gripe about, is a net negative on outcomes. Outcomes are what we should be focused on.
They circumvented fair bidding by appending the project as a change order onto a completely unrelated already-awarded project to the same bidder (Suffolk Construction). That's quite freaking not-okay, and quite freaking directly tied to the extremely bloated cost ($35M) of the renovation because no one else was allowed to compete and pitch something better. Foxboro cost exactly as much to renovate as Natick Center, with just 1 permanent platform, no vertical circulation, pre-existing egresses and utility hookups, no land acquisition, and no measures to retain existing service during construction. We don't know if anyone else could've met the deadline with a lower offer because there was no fair bidding process whatsoever.Well that's the kind of lesson I would want to be learned. That maybe said state law, just like many local ordinances we all regularly gripe about, is a net negative on outcomes. Outcomes are what we should be focused on.
Totally makes sense! Not having followed the project I was reacting exclusively to the speed headline.They circumvented fair bidding by appending the project as a change order onto a completely unrelated already-awarded project to the same bidder (Suffolk Construction). That's quite freaking not-okay, and quite freaking directly tied to the extremely bloated cost ($35M) of the renovation because no one else was allowed to compete and pitch something better. Foxboro cost exactly as much to renovate as Natick Center, with just 1 permanent platform, no vertical circulation, pre-existing egresses and utility hookups, no land acquisition, and no measures to retain existing service during construction. We don't know if anyone else could've met the deadline with a lower offer because there was no fair bidding process whatsoever.
That's a scandal, not a positive outcome to emulate.