MGH Ragon Building | 55 Fruit Street | West End

It may be for the second tower


In recognition of this visionary gift, MGH will name the East Tower of the Phillip and Susan Ragon Building the Herb Chambers Tower

 
Red-Blue is supposedly projected to cost 850 million, 100 million towards that probably would have been a better use of the funds.
 
It’s not the place of private citizens to directly fund public infrastructure projects. Besides, you’re still $750m short. You should be glad that Boston has this caliber of healthcare institution and deep-pocketed donors committed to its success.
 
It’s not the place of private citizens to directly fund public infrastructure projects. Besides, you’re still $750m short. You should be glad that Boston has this caliber of healthcare institution and deep-pocketed donors committed to its success.
Yea, Partners is just the best /s
 
A car dealer donating for transit improvements… that will be the day.
Given that Herb was one of the most vociferous business opponents of A Line restoration back when that was being fought in the courts 30 years ago and personally lobbied Menino to get the residual emergency pocket track ripped out in front of his Brighton Ave. dealership...yeah, I'll say LOL.
 
This is where the money actually goes. The USA is just a playground for oligarchs to purchase brands. The image of MGB, supposedly representing two of the best hospitals in the world, selling itself like a whore to an autocratic, backward monarchy ought inspire protests and revulsion. Yet, nobody cares.
Nobody knows. They also didn't really purchase the brand - they used "Boston" in the name, not Mass General or Brigham. It also looks like the shield logo is the same shape as the old Partners logo, but the pattern is Arabic in style (and maybe includes Arabic language but I can't tell from the renders). The implication actually is that the brand is inadequate and they need to trade on the collective image together with other networks.

It’s called having standards. And it always amuses me how people shit on MGH and BWH yet at the first sign that their illness is more complex than a hangnail that’s where they insist on going.
To be fair, a lot of that is around notions that standards of care and customer service have dropped with consolidation, not to mention the undermining of regional hospitals and their networks that has led to the Steward crisis among other issues. It's not hypocrisy to still identify them as the better choice compared to other hospitals.
 
Nobody knows. They also didn't really purchase the brand - they used "Boston" in the name, not Mass General or Brigham. It also looks like the shield logo is the same shape as the old Partners logo, but the pattern is Arabic in style (and maybe includes Arabic language but I can't tell from the renders). The implication actually is that the brand is inadequate and they need to trade on the collective image together with other networks.


To be fair, a lot of that is around notions that standards of care and customer service have dropped with consolidation, not to mention the undermining of regional hospitals and their networks that has led to the Steward crisis among other issues. It's not hypocrisy to still identify them as the better choice compared to other hospitals.
Deleted my lengthy rant on the state of affairs, but more simply put, first, the website says it was developed in collaboration with MGB and DFCI, and second, there is a general tendency for higher academic and medical centers to make partnerships with the Gulf states, which flies in the face of any just leadership and reflects the hollowing out of institutional leadership and replacing what used to be a field for PhD’s and MDs, to MBAs.

Re: healthcare, both can be true. Elite medical centers waste more, over diagnose and over treat and this, combined with brand prestige, tends to leave patients feeling like they got better treatment (because most American patients equate more with better, when the reality is the opposite is often the case).
 
Deleted my lengthy rant on the state of affairs, but more simply put, first, the website says it was developed in collaboration with MGB and DFCI, and second, there is a general tendency for higher academic and medical centers to make partnerships with the Gulf states, which flies in the face of any just leadership and reflects the hollowing out of institutional leadership and replacing what used to be a field for PhD’s and MDs, to MBAs.
You're not incorrect on either point, I was more commentating on how weird it is that they didn't actually use their brand, whether because they didn't want to be associated with the project (for the reasons you've mentioned) or because Sharjah didn't see value in it. Either way, the result is that they're presumably being compensated for participating but aren't actually publicly on the sign.

I actually wonder whether there's an untapped potential for the Gulf states to become a medical hub - both the patients and the doctors don't really need to be generated locally. That's probably what Sharjah is hoping, since they're decidedly an also-ran in the UAE.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FK4
East tower will be named after Herb Chambers. Maybe the west tower will have a naming opportunity with the entire building being named after Ragon
 
You're not incorrect on either point, I was more commentating on how weird it is that they didn't actually use their brand, whether because they didn't want to be associated with the project (for the reasons you've mentioned) or because Sharjah didn't see value in it. Either way, the result is that they're presumably being compensated for participating but aren't actually publicly on the sign.

I actually wonder whether there's an untapped potential for the Gulf states to become a medical hub - both the patients and the doctors don't really need to be generated locally. That's probably what Sharjah is hoping, since they're decidedly an also-ran in the UAE.
One thing we can know for sure is that the use of names is verrrrrry specific when it comes to institutions like these. So "in collaboration with" definitely means there was something official, since I am quite sure if it wasn't the lawyers would be all over them for misusing the names. However, as you point out, it isn't a full partnership or an outpost of MGB etc. I dont know what sort of arrangement institutions like Weil Cornell Medical School or NYU have with these governments, but it's likely very cumbersome from a legal and profit standpoint to have an official branch of an American non-profit institution in another country with totally different laws—not to mention the public outcry, but sadly, I dont think that is really a big thing anymore. The sad truth about healthcare is it can always be spun into sounding oh-so-beneficent, ie, "we will be treating poor kids from India being flown over to Doha under medical scholarships sponsored by the generosity of --- etc). Maybe MGB just isn't ready, financially or otherwise, for such wanton expansion. They are a local brand, in the end, after all. I'm sure the MBAs at the helm drool over national and international outposts but when they're telling their workforce they can barley afford reasonable pay or clinical space for patient care when they are simultaneously building a 2 billion dollar complex, it's kind of pouring fuel on the fire by declaring more investment in an oil country.

East tower will be named after Herb Chambers. Maybe the west tower will have a naming opportunity with the entire building being named after Ragon
There will be plenty of naming opportunities... the buildings, the complex, pavilions, clinical centers of excellence, units, endowed chairs, etc
 
This is where the money actually goes. The USA is just a playground for oligarchs to purchase brands. The image of MGB, supposedly representing two of the best hospitals in the world, selling itself like a whore to an autocratic, backward monarchy ought inspire protests and revulsion. Yet, nobody cares.
Can you explain this a bit further? From what I can tell, the facility reported in the article is funded by the UAE oil money, some of which is paid to MGB and Dana Farber for consulting purposes. What do you think the hospitals do with that money? They are non-profits, so they aren't using it for stock buy-backs or dividends, they are using it to defray their own operating costs providing care to regular people in Boston. That's a good thing.
 
Can you explain this a bit further? From what I can tell, the facility reported in the article is funded by the UAE oil money, some of which is paid to MGB and Dana Farber for consulting purposes. What do you think the hospitals do with that money? They are non-profits, so they aren't using it for stock buy-backs or dividends, they are using it to defray their own operating costs providing care to regular people in Boston. That's a good thing.
I hope you don't think that a not-for-profit designation means that behemoths like MGH/B dont have the army of lawyers and MBAs necessary to make them function quite differently from what the spirit of a non-profit is supposed to be. The leadership of prestigious healthcare institutions has been completely replaced by corporate mindset and strategies, which has led to a few things. The stated goals of the institution rarely fully align with what it is actually doing. These hospitals are not benevolent institutions fully prioritizing how to raise the general level of health of their patients. They have underfunded primary care for decades, underpay primary care workers, have minimal clinic space and support dedicated for primary care, community care, preventive care, but all the while expand expensive specialty clinics which, while valuable to a smaller number of patients, lead to both overexposure to expensive and unnecessary treatments provided to people who dont really need them, and moreover, the marketing of the services of the institution to international audiences, many of whom come and pay cash for these treatments, and often come from disreputable countries. You can sit back, shrug and say, "hey, that's capitalism for ya!", or you can step further back and recognize that this has been a growing trend for many years that was not always the case, and leads to an erosion of genuine, good faith focus on actual healthcare for the people whom the hospital supposedly serves. The occasional smiley ribbon cutting at the community health centers that the C-suites would love to jettison but cant, since they need them to check the box of "giving back to the community", pale in comparison to investment in extremely costly treatments and shiny new objects that ever and always are surging ahead of the crumbling primary care and basic bread-and-butter work of all specialties, not just medicine (basic general care medicine, neurology, pediatrics, psychiatry is all woefully under-prioritized compared to expensive subspecialty clinics of these same specialties). And of course, you have the overcharging of health insurance costs, which they can do because of their commanding near-monopoly and which the state has recognized as a blatant problem by suing and blocking the acquisition of South Shore Hospital and Hallmark Health (the whole Martha Coakley saga).

Then, you have the absurdity of the leadership salaries, multiple millions for many levels of upper leadership, who took zero pay cuts during the pandemic despite major funding cuts, complete destruction experienced across all clinical settings with enormous distress for all levels of people actually doing clinical work who had to contend with virus risk compounded by massive staffing cuts and loss of resources, and an ongoing salary distribution amidst a monarchical leadership comprising a legion of overpaid MBAs who make policy by fiat with blissful unconcern for what's happening on the ground. Notice that the residencies joined a union last year—unprecedented for an elite institution to have this happen—meanwhile the primary care docs may unionize as well. Annual reports for 3 years running show job dissatisfaction and burnout scores amongst the rank and file to both be in the high 30%s/low 40%s. These numbers are stunning.

None of this is unique to this institution but reflects a deeper process playing out across healthcare and higher education as well, which has identical problems just slightly different configurations. None of this means that people who work at these places are bad people, either. But the overall process and the overall leadership cannot simply hide behind the same old shrug of "well, it's just really complicated" any longer. I would say this all speaks to the even deeper crisis of late stage capitalism, the failure of neoliberalism, and the ongoing (and what could have otherwise been preventable) rise of right wing politics across the western democracies.

Anyway, rant aside, maybe I can put it more simply. Call me crazy, but I dont think any hospital in the USA should be consulting for—ie, getting money from—a futurist and assuredly elitist (not for "the people") healthcare city development in a country that only passed legislation in 2020 that a woman isn't legally obligated to "obey" her husband and where women still are legally required to maintain the home, whereas real work is done by imported labor who endure racism and structural oppression via the kefala laws (look these up if you want, it's beyond insane), and where technically, homosexuality is punishable by death even though in reality things are enlightened enough where you'd just get fined or jailed. Yay.

This development is not building the BMC or Bellevue of Dubai. It's a shiny, sleek, expensive palace for international medical tourism. In a country with severe human rights abuses. MGH and BWH, the hospitals of MGB, are Harvard hospitals. These people know better. It's not OK, and the fact is that this little consulting gig is a string you can pull on and out tumbles the cupidity-driven rot of the modern supposedly non-profit system.
 

Back
Top