Millennium Tower (Filene's) | 426 Washington Street | Downtown

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Filene's

^^How would hefty fines not be an incentive to sell/build the lot?

The longer they leave the lot vacant, the more fines they pay.

oLD Unsle say unSConsrtrictutIonaL. So. NOT work. Make INTo new HOOFERVILLE for DTX bums
 
Re: Filene's

Bipolar city agency threatens(?) Filene?s developer
Boston Herald

If you?re confused about what the city?s goal is in Downtown Crossing, you?re certainly not alone.

The story so far, in case you?ve been buried away in a Basement (pun intended), the New York City-based developer behind a planned $700-million, mixed-use tower on the site of what once housed Filene?s flagship store stopped construction on the project when financing dried up, leaving a hole in the ground in what is Boston?s major downtown shopping district.

Vornado Realty Trust chairman Steven Roth then infuriated the mayor of Boston when he suggested to a home-town audience that he was purposely delaying work until the city coughed up some public concessions. (Ahem, perhaps hoping for a cut in city property taxes similar to what Liberty Mutual received, just down the street.)

Mayor Thomas M Menino responded with a testy letter, this past March, saying that Roth was showing a ?callous disregard for the well-being of the city and its people.? The Boston Redevelopment Authority (BRA) whispered that it might begin the process of eminent domain, basically buying the property back from Vornado (against their will) and finding a new developer.

But now it?s not clear what?s going on.

In today?s Boston Herald, Thomas Grillo reports that the city will not start eminent domain proceedings.

?The site has a value in the tens of millions of dollars and it became clear to us that it would be too expensive to do a taking,? said John Palmieri, director of the Boston Redevelopment Authority.

But, in today?s Boston Business Journal, part of a letter written by Palmieri to Vornado (and local developer Boston Global Investors) is published:

?As it was clearly stated in my letter to you dated September 27, 2010, the Boston Redevelopment Authority (?BRA?) is committed to taking appropriate action to alter the current unacceptable status of the One Franklin Street Development (the ?Project?). You are both aware that this Project is critical to the economic vitality of the Downtown Crossing area and the entire city.?

Exactly what ?action? is considered appropriate for the city remains an unknown. The BRA has threatened withdrawing the permits it?s issued to the developer. Barring that, and seeing as eminent domain too expensive an undertaking (and one with murky legal precedent, as well), that doesn?t leave many options.

Maybe more angry letters?

http://www.bostonherald.com/blogs/news/getting_real/
 
Re: Filene's

Maybe Don can swap off his garage for this spot. City is desperate to fix this and they're still willing to let those working on the Filene's project do work elsewhere in the city, so maybe we'll get 2 things done.
 
Re: Filene's

Vornado would come into court and state that if it wasn't for Vornado's financing of Filene's Basement, there would be no Basement, and no tourist attraction, permanent or otherwise.

How so? If Vornado hadn't torn down this building and forced Filene's Basement to move out, the Basement would still be there, unchanged from four years ago. The company probably would have avoided bankruptcy too, which resulted from greatly reduced sales after this location closed.
 
Re: Filene's

I like the idea of giving Don Chiafaro a shot at this space, but he wouldn't go for it because he wants his "empire" clustered together on the Greenway. We all know that something will eventually be built on this site, what and how long it will take is the real mystery. I do agree that Filene's Basement should have been allowed to continue on at its original location because the move has really hurt not only Downtown Crossing, but their business as well. Location is everything in my book. The location thing includes Louis move to the waterfront housed in a "temporary" store. This spelled the end of Louis IMO and I think that it's only a matter of time before they go under. I'd bet that a restaurant ends up in their present waterfront space. We'll see.
 
Re: Filene's

How so? If Vornado hadn't torn down this building and forced Filene's Basement to move out, the Basement would still be there, unchanged from four years ago. The company probably would have avoided bankruptcy too, which resulted from greatly reduced sales after this location closed.
The Basement became a regional chain, with stores along the East Coast. Its 2009 bankruptcy was its second in ten years.

From Wiki

Filene's Basement, and its sister company, Filene's Department Store, were wholly-owned by Federated Department Stores of Cincinnati. The two entities shared many operating systems, including payroll, benefits, and a common credit card. Top executives, at the time, included: Sam DiPhillippo (Marketing), Audie Dunham and Kathleen Collman (HR), and others.


Following the ill-fated acquisition of Federated by Campeau Corp. of Canada, Filene's Basement was spun-off. It became a privately-held venture in a LBO arrangement led by then-CEO & President Jim Anathan and Chairman Sam Gerson and other investors. The entity became known as 'Filene's Basement, Inc.', and remained headquartered in Wellesley, Massachusetts.


In April 1988, Filene's was acquired by May Department Stores and the fortunes of the stores diverged. Filene's Basement, now a separate company, embarked on a massive but ill-advised strategy of expansion that, ten years later, in August 1998, forced the chain to seek Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection; more than 30 outlets were shuttered. Filene's Basement's journey through the bankruptcy process was brief, and expansion soon resumed, albeit more cautiously.[3]


In March 1999, the company debuted a new weekend warehouse store concept, Aisle 3. The stores, averaging 60,000 square feet (5,600 m2), operated only Friday through Sunday and were located near major metropolitan areas.[4] Plans were to open at least 10 stores by the end of 1999 and 40 to 50 stores in the following years, but ultimately only eight opened. All Aisle 3 location were closed following the purchase of Filene's Basement by Value City Department Stores Inc. (later Retail Ventures, Inc.) in March 2000. Soon afterward, three Filene's Basement locations reopened in the vicinity of Washington, D.C., and modest efforts at expansion resumed.[5]

In 2006, the original Filene's chain of which the store had once been a part, was purchased by its rival Macy's Department Stores. Because many store locations between the two chains did not overlap, most Filene's locations were spared and reopened as Macy's, but the flagship location (which sat across the street from an existing Macy's store) was not. Macy's shuttered the Filene's in downtown Boston directly above the flagship Filene's Basement location and sold the building for redevelopment. That Filene's Basement location was subsequently closed on September 3, 2007, to accommodate the redevelopment project.
....
The economic crisis took its toll on the chain and owner Retail Ventures, Inc announced on January 20, 2009 its plans to close 11 of the chain's 36 stores.[7] The store closures did not help and on April 22, 2009, Retail Ventures, Inc. announced that it had sold the remaining 25 Filene's Basement stores to the Buxbaum Group, a company that specializes in liquidations. The Buxbaum Group did not indicate what it would do with its acquisition, although Retail Ventures had previously indicated that the company's future was uncertain.[8] The store officially filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on May 4, while real estate investors Crown Acquisitions and the Chetrit Group offered $22 million to purchase the name and leases on 17 of Filene's Basement's most profitable stores. They announced that they would keep the stores open and focus on castoffs from luxury-goods makers.[9] On June 15, 2009 Syms and Vornado were declared the winners of the bankruptcy auction of Filene's Basement's assets when the Syms-Vornado group agreed to pay 62.4 million dollars, subject to bankruptcy court approval

It had become a hollow shell [no pun] of the original Basement.
 
Re: Filene's

How so? If Vornado hadn't torn down this building and forced Filene's Basement to move out, the Basement would still be there, unchanged from four years ago. The company probably would have avoided bankruptcy too, which resulted from greatly reduced sales after this location closed.

FB would still have declared bankruptcy anyway. They had far-reaching troubles with their entire chain that the high costs of maintenance of the DTX store only exacerbated. Besides, EVERY surface of the Burnham building had asbestos on it. It really needed to be cleaned out.
 
Re: Filene's

Besides, EVERY surface of the Burnham building had asbestos on it. It really needed to be cleaned out.

There's dozens (hundreds?) of buildings in the city that are loaded with asbestos. It's not dangerous if it's not airborne. I don't see what asbestos had to do with the failure of Filene's B.
 
Re: Filene's

What happened to the recent iterations of Basement is the up-market department stores began opening their own off-price 'outlets': Saks has Off Fifth, Needless Markup has 'Last Call, Nordstrom has the Rack, etc.

Back in the day, the original Filene's Basement was the outlet for a lot of this merchandise. Now, Filene's Basement is little different from a Loehman's, or Marshalls.
 
Re: Filene's

There's dozens (hundreds?) of buildings in the city that are loaded with asbestos. It's not dangerous if it's not airborne. I don't see what asbestos had to do with the failure of Filene's B.

That store could have thousands of people circulating through it on a busy day. There was broken plaster, flooring, ceilings, pipe wrapping, etc everywhere. When FB moved out but before demolition began, you could really see how poor a condition the space was in. It was long past time for a gut renovation regardless of whatever was happening to the rest of the building. The space also needed a water remediation solution (one was designed for the new store) to take care of the constant leaks the space suffered from around it's exterior walls.
 
Re: Filene's

Developer to city: suck on it (Part I)

Boston Business Journal
November 4, 2010

Saber rattling is rarely a useful tool when targeted at developers swimming in red ink, but give the Boston Redevelopment Authority style points for taking its grievances with the One Franklin Street project to the public.

BRA Director John Palmieri is expected sooner or later to make good on his promise to ?make a determination? on whether the project?s developers, a Massachusetts LLC registered to Vornado Realty Trust and John Hynes? Boston Global Investors, need to essentially start back at square one and begin the arduous process of resubmitting the project for BRA review. His determination will be based on, among other things, a bunch of grouchy letters submitted to the BRA by area business owners and tourism folks PO?d over the project site?s pitiful progress.

More: http://www.bizjournals.com/boston/r...-franklin-st-position-is.html?ana=e_bost_real
 
Re: Downtown Crossing

http://www.boston.com/business/ticker/2010/11/city_formally_p.html?p1=News_links

City formally pulls Filene?s permit
November 17, 2010 03:32 PM E-mail| |Comments (4)| Text size ? + E-mail this article To: Invalid email address Add a personal message: Your e-mail: Invalid email address
Sending your articleYour article has been sent. Casey Ross, Globe Staff

Boston officials today formally revoked permits for the stalled Filene's redevelopment in Downtown Crossing, telling the developers that their failure to proceed with construction has cost the city $20 million in tax revenue and thousands of jobs.

The decision to pull the permits could reduce the value of the property as the current owner, a team led by Vornado Realty Trust of New York, is trying to sell it to a new developer. Vornado has been seeking a buyer for the last month.

In a letter sent to the developers today, the Boston Redevelopment Authority said it decided to pull the permits because of their failure to move forward with construction during the past three years. The delay has led to several negative impacts on the city, including the lost jobs and tax revenue, and the vacant construction crater the developers have left in the heart of Downtown Crossing.

"We have heard from the public who overwhelmingly felt that your disregard for the economic health of Downtown Crossing had a negative impact on the area," BRA director John Palmieri wrote to the developers. Representatives for Vornado could not be immediately reached for comment.
 
Re: Filene's

Why the selective treatment for this project? The demolition of Filenes took place in Spring of 2008. The demolition of half a block up the street at the Kensington site took place in spring of 2005, yet the BRA nor the mayor have ever publicly criticized that project or threatened to revoke its permits.

Not saying Vornado doesn't deserve this, but there seems to clearly be a double standard here.
 
Re: Filene's

Leaving a huge hole in the ground, and endangering the remaining walls of a historic building, is worse than just creating an empty lot.
 
Re: Filene's

Leaving a huge hole in the ground, and endangering the remaining walls of a historic building, is worse than just creating an empty lot.

The conditions under which permits will be revoked when construction fails to start does not differentiate between an empty lot or a a huge crater. This is double standard no matter how you look at it.
 
Re: Filene's

The conditions under which permits will be revoked when construction fails to start does not differentiate between an empty lot or a a huge crater. This is double standard no matter how you look at it.

Don't forget that little speech there about holding out on a project in NYC to profit off the city buying it off them. If I was mayor, I'd be pissed to hear this from a big project's developer.
 
Re: Filene's

Don't forget that little speech there about holding out on a project in NYC to profit off the city buying it off them. If I was mayor, I'd be pissed to hear this from a big project's developer.

In other words, if you piss off the mayor, he will slam the book on you. If you don't, what 5 year stalled development?
 
Re: Filene's

He didn't specifically just piss off Menino, he pissed off anyone who actually cares about this city. (Or, really, any city this dickbag operates in)
 
Re: Filene's

In other words, if you piss off the mayor, he will slam the book on you. If you don't, what 5 year stalled development?

It's not a personal issue, though. It's about the well-being of the city as a whole. We're not talking about the developer getting under the covers with they mayor's daughter, we're talking about the developer giving a big FU to the whole city.
 
Re: Filene's

^^Right, any good mayor in Menino's shoes would have done the same thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top