Millennium Tower (Filene's) | 426 Washington Street | Downtown

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Filene's

I have changed my thinking on the city's involvement. Before I was dead set against it, based on the track record, e.g., even a complete incompetent would have required some sort of performance bond before issuing the demolition permits.

Now I see a scenario: greedy, arrogant developer files tax abatement request citing a low value due to no rental income, no sales potential for crater, and high cost to cure. City takes property by eminent domain and awards greedy developer a pro tanto equal to the low valuation claimed by the developer in the abatement application. City flips property to someone who can do something in a couple of years.

Flaw in the plan? City involvement.
 
Re: Filene's

Wasn't eminent domain invented for this kind of thing?

Developer says it will be blight until the city gives him massive tax breaks.

Why cant city take the property and auction it off to someone else?
 
Re: Filene's

Eminent Domain was invented so that the government could build public goods such as schools and roads and water works. Eminent Domain to deal with 'blight' came much later.

But I agree. What could be more blighted than this property?
 
Re: Filene's

Steve Roth is a crass pig. Should be jailed.



And Menino the lackey.
 
Last edited:
Re: Filene's

Banker & Tradesman - March 8, 2010
A New Way Forward
Developers Float Filene?s Phasing Plan
Parking Garage, Low-Rise Retail Could Buy Time For Larger Project


By Paul McMorrow

Banker & Tradesman Staff Writer

03/08/10

The former site of Filene's in Boston's Downtown CrossingWork at the stalled Filene's redevelopment project could resume well before Boston's wounded commercial market rebounds, under a breakthrough construction phasing plan now being weighed by developers Vornado Realty Trust and Gale International.

The new plan, proposed to the Boston Redevelopment Authority by Vornado and Gale after heavy pressure from the city, would have the development team fill in the project site?s gaping hole with an underground parking garage, topped by a low-rise retail structure. That work, estimated to cost around $75 million, would feature foundations and building pads to allow the second phase, the project?s tower component, to proceed when credit markets normalize and commercial demand increases, according to industry sources.

?[Boston Mayor Thomas Menino] has made it clear he expects the development team to really try to consider a new template, things not traditionally included in a development pro forma,? BRA Director John Palmieri told Banker & Tradesman. ?[The mayor] has used the term ?sense of urgency.? The hole is a real problem. It?s a signature location. We need to be attentive to a development program that will remove this blight from an important neighborhood.?

A joint venture between Vornado, Mack-Cali Realty Corp. and JP Morgan paid $100 million in cash for the development site. Gale, the project?s lead developer, manages the two LLC?s that control the site, but has just a 0.005 percent equity stake, or $500,000, in the venture.

Tough Talk Gets Results

Construction on the 39-story, mixed-use project came to an abrupt halt in the fall of 2008, when lenders yanked financing commitments from the $700 million project. Since then, Vornado and Gale have chased a rapidly deteriorating commercial market downhill.

Gale CEO John Hynes has twice floated plans for slimmer, cheaper versions of the proposed hotel, office, residential and retail tower, but financing remains elusive.

The loss of the project?s two anchor tenants has not helped matters. The law firm Fish & Richardson decamped to Fan Pier, while Vornado bought Filene?s Basement out of bankruptcy to cancel its long-term retail lease at the site.

The $75 million phased solution would restore the continuity of Downtown Crossing?s streetscape, while preserving the viability of future construction above. Similar phased parking foundations preceded air rights development at the TD Garden and the former Lafayette Place mall just down the street from Filene?s, now known as the Lafayette Corporate Center.

Banker & Tradesman previously reported that city officials were threatening Vornado and Gale with regime change, with all options on the table ? up to and including eminent domain ? if the developers couldn?t generate movement at the Downtown Crossing site.

That tough talk appears to be paying dividends. The Filene?s redevelopers are radically altering their development schedule. And after publicly attacking Vornado on multiple occasions, Palmieri said Menino is now ?willing to entertain gap financing? to help the project move forward.

?It?s about creating jobs, expanding the tax base and removing the blight,? he said.

Click to enlarge this timeline of the troubled recent past of the former Filene's sitePreparing For Battle

At the same time they were revamping their development program, the site?s developers also appear to have been readying themselves for a courtroom battle.

Annual reports from Vornado and Mack-Cali show in 2008, the Filene?s joint venture partners booked a $69.5 million impairment charge on the project. New SEC filings from each company show no such write-down in 2009 ? a year in which commercial markets deteriorated significantly. Several industry sources told Banker & Tradesman the decision not to recognize a second impairment may have been made with an eye towards having to defend a high project value before an eminent domain jury.

Gale, Vornado, and JP Mogan offered no comment for this story. Mack-Cali did not return calls seeking comment.

The new phasing concept would bridge the gap that has left the Filene?s redevelopment hamstrung. Menino has repeatedly demanded that Vornado and Gale restart work at the site, which has blown a deep hole in the heart of the city?s downtown commercial district. But Vornado and Gale have been unwilling to build a smaller, more easily financeable project, because such a project would lose buckets of money.

The project?s owners need a substantially sized project to make any return on their investment. Demand for such a project currently does not exist in Boston. So the Filene?s site owners have been forced to wait for a rebound in a market that?s still deteriorating.

Between the midpoint of 2008 and the end of 2009, a wave of 1.7 million square feet of vacant office space hit the Boston market, driving the vacancy rate to 17 percent. During that same time, rental rates for Class A office space in Boston fell 28 percent, from $69 to $50, according to data from Jones Lang LaSalle. Brokers have forecast slight declines in occupancy and rental rates in 2010.

?This is not a city project. It?s a private sector initiative, and they ran into a buzzsaw,? Palmieri said. ?They?re facing significant hurdles with financing. We understand that. But it?s very important to us to identify a path forward. We?re working to figure out a plan that they can finance, and that meets with our approval.?
 
Re: Filene's

Is Palmieri completely ignoring the info in post 1716?
 
Re: Filene's

Low rise retail structure? Are we going to get another Louis Boston Seaport Edition here?
 
Re: Filene's

Perhaps a nice discount jewelry shop?
 
Re: Filene's

There is plenty of empty retail space in DTX already. Don't get me wrong, I would rather see something built than the hole. My question, what tenants are going to be attracted to a space knowing they could potentially be booted out of so tower construction can begin?

This is the same reason tenants are not moving into space that they feel is owned or managed but a failing company. It is going to take some crafty contract work.
 
Re: Filene's

There is plenty of empty retail space in DTX already. Don't get me wrong, I would rather see something built than the hole. My question, what tenants are going to be attracted to a space knowing they could potentially be booted out of so tower construction can begin?

This is the same reason tenants are not moving into space that they feel is owned or managed but a failing company. It is going to take some crafty contract work.

Hynes, Vornado, JPM Morgan should begin to auction the site off to a developer that is planning to invest in the area. It seems that their investment strategy was to flip this project like he did with Lincoln St. This site needs a Long-Term Vision and alot of creativity.
 
Re: Filene's

Wasn't eminent domain invented for this kind of thing?

Developer says it will be blight until the city gives him massive tax breaks.

Why cant city take the property and auction it off to someone else?

I should be mayor!


Mayor Thomas M. Menino threatened yesterday to use eminent domain powers to seize the gutted former Filene?s site in Downtown Crossing after a New York-based developer bragged about using a deliberate blight strategy to extract government concessions on a similar project in Manhattan.

Vornado Realty Trust?s billionaire chairman Steven Roth, 67, reportedly told a Columbia University audience last week that he purposely left the site of a former Alexander?s store on Lexington Avenue in New York City vacant and blighted because ?the more governments would want this redeveloped, the more help they would give us when the time came.?

In a letter to Roth sent yesterday, Menino called the alleged remarks ?simply outrageous.?

...

Menino, who interrupted a vacation in Florida to finalize the letter blasting Roth, went on to question Vornado?s explanation for leaving the former Filene?s site vacant.

...
Responding to what he called a ?consistent policy of indifference? and saying he won?t let the site ?lay dormant,? Menino wrote: ?I am directing the Boston Redevelopment Authority to examine eminent domain options for the One Franklin Street site. I will also ask that the Authority re-evaluate the approvals it has already given this project.

?This development is too important to Downtown Crossing and to the entire city of Boston to be used as a bargaining chip to improve your bottom line.?
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view.bg?articleid=1238261&srvc=rss
 
Re: Filene's

Whattamayuh! Innaruptin' his vacation ta Flawrida fah the good of 'is consitchuents!
 
Re: Filene's

Boston.com
Menino threatens Filene's project over developer's remarks
March 8, 2010 06:56 PM E-mail| |Comments (10)| Text size ? +

By Casey Ross, Globe Staff

Boston Mayor Thomas M. Menino is threatening to pull the permits of the stalled Filene's redevelopment and even take the property by eminent domain as he fired back as one of its developers, who last week implied he has allowed a project to sit idle in hopes of receiving government aid.

In a letter to Vornado Realty Trust of New York Menino said the city would explore those actions because he was convinced by recent remarks from company chairman Steven Roth that Vornado is deliberately neglecting Filene's so Boston officials will provide more money to pay for its redevelopment.

"This development is too important to Downtown Crossing and to the entire City of Boston to be used as a bargaining chip to improve your bottom line," Menino wrote.

Neither Roth nor Vornado had an immediate response to the letter.

In a talk at Columbia University last week, Roth recounted how he had allowed an Alexander's department store to sit vacant for three years in order to pressure NewYork officials to provide funds to improve it.

In Boston, the $700 million Filene's project, by Vornado and Gale International of Boston, stalled in the summer of 2008. Executives with Gale and Vornado have said they have been unable to borrow the money necessary to resume work on the site.
 
Re: Filene's

Boston Globe - March 9, 2010
Menino threatens to oust Filene?s site developer
Vornado chief?s remarks irk mayor

By Casey Ross, Globe Staff | March 9, 2010

Mayor Thomas M. Menino yesterday threatened to revoke permits for the stalled Filene?s redevelopment and even take the property by eminent domain, accusing one of the developers of enacting a policy to deliberately sit on idle properties to pressure government officials to provide funding.

Menino told Vornado Realty Trust in a letter last night that the city will explore those actions after comments last week by its chairman, Steven Roth, convinced him the New York company is deliberately neglecting the Filene?s site so Boston officials will help finance construction.

?This development is too important to Downtown Crossing and to the entire City of Boston to be used as a bargaining chip to improve your bottom line,?? Menino wrote.

The mayor was reacting to comments Roth made during a presentation at Columbia University that were reported in the New York Observer.

Roth was quoted as saying he sat on the former Alexander?s Department store in midtown Manhattan in the 1990s, allowing it become blighted in order to squeeze money out of public officials.

Vornado acquired the site after the store closed and, similar to the Filene?s site, left it half demolished before eventually building a glass skyscraper that now houses the Bloomberg financial news company.

?Why did I do nothing??? Roth said, according to the Observer. ?The more the building was a blight; the more governments would want this to be redeveloped; the more help they would give us when the time came.??

Roth could not be reached for comment. A Vornado spokeswoman declined to comment, saying she was unable to reach Roth or other officials at the company.

At the Filene?s site in Boston, Vornado and partner Gale International halted construction on the $700 million project in the summer of 2008, saying they had been unable to borrow funds to resume the redevelopment. The site, at the center of Downtown Crossing, includes a large hole in the ground, as well as the skeletal remains of several buildings.

Menino said Roth?s comments about the Alexander project ?undercut the credibility of your team?s explanation in Boston.??

?While I appreciate that there are global economic forces that have slowed the progress of development across the country, your comments and past actions at the Alexander?s Department store indicate that a consistent policy of indifference is at work at [Filene?s].??

Also in the letter, Menino wrote that he is directing the Boston Redevelopment Authority to examine ?eminent domain options?? for the site; he also wrote that he has asked the BRA to reevaluate city approvals given for the project.

Menino has made revitalization of Downtown Crossing a priority, and at his insistence, Gale and Vornado draped tarps over the half-demolished buildings. However, the developers have resisted other calls to improve the site because of the project?s struggling finances.

Original plans for the project called for a 39-story tower with a hotel, stores, offices, and more than 160 condominiums, but the developers have been considering ways to scale back the work to make it easier to finance.

Casey Ross can be reached at cross@globe.com.
 
Re: Filene's

I'm not familiar with the development business, so pardon my ignorance. I assume Vornado must have had to apply for permits before demolishing Filene's. Shouldn't part of the overall permitting process entail assurances from the developer that he has financing locked down before he can be allowed to demolish a block in the middle of a city's downtown?
 
Re: Filene's

This might end very badly for the city. Menino can huff and puff all he wants. If Roth doesn't get help from the city then this project will be in the courts for a long-time. The city has no rights to take this project especially when the BRA fast-tracked this project without doing the proper due dilligence. This is a losing bet for the city. My bet is the taxpayers cough up money to get this one finished under our trusted Mayor.
 
Re: Filene's

I'm not familiar with the development business, so pardon my ignorance. I assume Vornado must have had to apply for permits before demolishing Filene's. Shouldn't part of the overall permitting process entail assurances from the developer that he has financing locked down before he can be allowed to demolish a block in the middle of a city's downtown?
Somewhere in the belly of this thread there is a long discussion on that topic.

The general consensus was that requiring proof of financing up front would bring all new development to a halt.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top