Multi-Family Zoning Requirements for MBTA Communities

 
This doesn't surprise me at all. Duxbury is filled with NIMBYs.
 
Until there's enforcement, compliance is effectively optional. I think the Milton lawsuit(s) are still in flight, with the last hearing in October. According to the link below, the court could rule by ~Feb whether Campbell has enforcement power as AG. Depending on how the court rules it could cause a lot of these municipalities to change their tune. More than anything these towns are putting their marker down in case there's a path for noncompliance.

 
In early October, the Gloucester City Council approved the zoning plan to comply with the 2021 MBTA Communities Act. However, in recent weeks, a group of residents gathered enough signatures to require the council to reconsider.
 

Framingham City Council creates new plan to address state's multifamily zoning law​

1733477574303.jpeg


“FRAMINGHAM — The City Council has sent its plan to comply with the MBTA Communities Act to the Planning Board for a public hearing after a lengthy council meeting on Monday.”

“Framingham's current plan is based off a Nov. 14 proposal, which had seven overlay districts throughout the city, most of them near the city's downtown Commuter Rail station. Councilors added a few tweaks to that plan, with the idea that final density and other parameters will be ironed out in December.”

The new plan was devised after more than two hours of discussion about whether the city should even comply with the law by the Dec. 31 deadline, as well as options on how the city can possibly achieve so-called "paper compliance" — placing zones where new housing may never get built. Councilors also discussed how the city could earn "credit" for apartment complexes already built over the past few years.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/framingh...6VlswQVLUBfGnu8x6uzJvyBE3cMcQnu_g0sKs32CPHDml


Housing. Crisis.
 
Affordable. Housing. Crisis.

There isn't a housing shortage. There's an affordable housing shortage. The idea that we're going to build our way out of this problem by zoning little districts of Roslindales next to cow pastures in places like Sudbury is misguided and unrealistic. This is a global problem which was created and is being perpetuated by the policies of national governments and central banks (especially our own) , and it can only be solved at this level. To believe the MBTA Communities Act will do anything to alleviate this is naive. It will merely further enrich developers, landlords and others connected to the real estate industry at the expense of citizens and municipal governments who will be left to deal with the externalities.
 
Affordable. Housing. Crisis.

There isn't a housing shortage. There's an affordable housing shortage. The idea that we're going to build our way out of this problem by zoning little districts of Roslindales next to cow pastures in places like Sudbury is misguided and unrealistic. This is a global problem which was created and is being perpetuated by the policies of national governments and central banks (especially our own) , and it can only be solved at this level. To believe the MBTA Communities Act will do anything to alleviate this is naive. It will merely further enrich developers, landlords and others connected to the real estate industry at the expense of citizens and municipal governments who will be left to deal with the externalities.

What do you suggest?
 

Back
Top