New BSA Digs

vanshnookenraggen

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
May 25, 2006
Messages
6,963
Reaction score
1,585
02.28.2011
New Digs for Boston Society of Architects

hyabsa02.jpg



Founded as a professional organization in 1867, the Boston Society of Architects (BSA) is one the oldest and the largest AIA chapters in the country. Long located in a historic, if cramped space at 52 Broad Street, the building lacks street frontage, preventing the chapter?s leadership from reaching a broader public. So with the same reinvigoration aims as New York?s Center for Architecture, the BSA is building a new headquarters, one it is hoped will engage chapter members as well as the public at large.

The chapter found space in a new building?built behind a preserved facade?at 290 Congress Street, near the Greenway, developed by Boston Properties. The chapter benefitted from Chapter 91, a Massachusetts law that reserves public uses for waterfront properties; the site is alongside Congress just as it springs over the river. The BSA is paying roughly the same rent for three times the space of their old offices.

After a two-stage competition open to BSA members only, which garnered 19 submissions, the jury selected Howeler + Yoon (H+Y) as the winner. Other finalists included Single Speed Design, Merge Architects, and Hashim Sarkis Studio. The chapter wanted to ?level the playing field? between large firms and small, according to BSA president Audrey O?Hagan, so they limited the competition to two weeks and only a single presentation board.

Hoewler + Yoon?s design calls for a dramatic, brightly colored staircase visible at the ground level entrance. The staircase wraps up onto the wall and then curves onto the ceiling, drawing the eye and, the BSA hopes, visitors up to the second floor?s 5,000-square-foot gallery. Four conference rooms with curved walls divide the space but also allow for chance run-ins within the gallery. ?The conference rooms contaminate the gallery space,? Howeler said. ?In the old BSA, the most active space was the elevator. We want to retain the possibility of chance encounters.? Offices are located behind the gallery. A large auditorium is located elsewhere in the building and was not under the purview of the competition.

Though the competition board shows the sculptural staircase in vivid green, H+Y is toying with other color and graphics schemes. ?We want it to be punchy,? Howeler said.

?We tried not to be too prescriptive, to allow for some creativity in programming strategies,? O?Hagan said. H+Y is also investigating ways in which technology can be integrated into the architecture. ?The BSA is a content producer, from lectures and webinars, to workshops on mold abatement,? Howeler said. ?So we?re looking at ways in which technology within the space can make it more valuable to members and public.? He cited smart phone applications that would be available only within the space as one idea.

Howeler points out that the second floor gallery is twice the size of MoMA?s gallery for the architecture and design permanent collection. While there are university galleries and at least one alternative gallery?pinkcomma?there are no institutional galleries in Boston wholly devoted to architecture and design. Howeler also said the chapter intends to expand its exhibition program and hire its first full time curator.

For H+Y, the BSA?s stated goals for the competition were met. ?Competitions like this are really important for younger firms to get opportunities so you?re not being judged solely on the number of architecture centers you?ve designed,? Howeler said.

Alan G. Brake

More pictures here

It will be built either in the base of Atlantic Wharf or next to it, not sure.
Google Maps
 
The BSA secured space at 1/3rd the rate of the their old digs. Savings on the remaining 2/3rds should cover some costs. 5-10 years of fundraising might cover the rest.

These futuristic designs complement Forest City's competition-winning proposal for redevelopment of the Old Northern Avenue Bridge. Also that sci-fi rendering recently published for Parcel A on Seaport Square.

Will belief in a time-space continuum also make "inception" possible?
 
Wait, I'm confused: is that an interior design rendering?
 
Correction to my post above: The BSA is not paying 1/3rd of the rate of their old lease. From the newsletter: "The BSA is paying roughly the same rent for three times the space of their old offices."

^Arch101: The "Architects Building" is completely contained within the historic facade of Atlantic Wharf. It is an interior design, not a building.
 
^^I think he was referring to the building they are in now.
 
I'm confused why czsz (who is usually on the ball with things) asked if it was an interior design rendering. It appears to be obvious?
 
I dunno. My first thought was outdoor fried-food stand, but I can see it as an indoor space now.
 
That rendering does make it appear as if it could be a pavilion, especially with the outermost walls on the upper floor unnecessarily omitted.

The BSA does own the Architect's Building on Broad St. I don't know if this new space means they're putting their old building up for sale or what.
 
Correction to my post above: The BSA is not paying 1/3rd of the rate of their old lease. From the newsletter: "The BSA is paying roughly the same rent for three times the space of their old offices."

Why are they paying rent on a building they own?
 
Why are they paying rent on a building they own?

The BSA is moving to Atlantic Wharf, 2nd Floor. They don't own the space -- they are leasing.

State Waterfront Tidelands regulations require some groundfloor space on Waterfront buildings for "facilities of public accommodation" including civic uses in addition to commercial retail. The BSA was selected as the candidate to fill that civic space, and they are not paying market rate. The subsidy is part of the mitigation package provided by Atlantic Wharf in exchange for its zoning variances.

The BRA has supported the idea that Chapter 91 "facilities of public accommodation" can be on upper floors, not groundfloors. Apparently, the State agrees this is acceptable.
 
But the do own the building they are currently in. My question is how can the rent at Atlantic Wharf be less then the rent they pay at a building they own?
 

Back
Top