M
markhb
Guest
I'd be fine with reindustrialization, to be honest, and that includes the grain elevators (there were originally two at GT, which I don't remember, and a smaller one near Hobson's Wharf which I remember well).
.....in fact the "hat" reminds me of the one on that building's neighbor, 101 Huntington.
Sorry- but 111 Huntington is AWFUL and dated.It's one thing to suggest building industrial grain elevators again ... it's another when designing what is so obviously an ugly pencil/needle d*ck of a building.
The facade - yup, will be great for birds to nest and shit all over, bravo on that brilliant and well thought out design.
The top - probably a great location for nests and bird shit, an errant trash bag blowing in the wind ... who knows?
The angled corners - why the f*ck would you even do that? It doesn't "ADD" any "ooh-la-la" to the design.
Want something that will actually resemble a lighthouse and not a cheap solar patio light ... look at 111 Huntington in Boston. Build THAT.
Methinks the architect has never seen a lighthouse in their lives ...
For me, this is reinforcing the sentiment that I just think the building as a whole is unattractive. The hat may be the first jarring element the eye lands on, but it's not the only thing keeping the building from looking better. Obviously it's all subjective, some people like it. But the more I look at it, the less I like about its appearance (again, the scale/height are fine - great even).This is what it would look like without the crown. Honestly, I like it better with it than without.
View attachment 69568
This is what it would look like without the crown. Honestly, I like it is better with it than without.
View attachment 69568