Other People's Rail: Amtrak, commuter rail, rapid transit news & views outside New England


What's the value proposition here as compared to taking a regular LIRR train into the city and transferring?

Amtrak would express past most stops, but they'd also be stuck with having to change out the locomotive. Is that even a net positive on travel time?
 
If rail congestion in Connecticut means the alternative to running to Long Island is turning around in New York City, then giving (some) Long Islanders a one-seat ride to Philadelphia, Baltimore and Washington D.C. might be worth a try.
 
What's the value proposition here as compared to taking a regular LIRR train into the city and transferring?

Amtrak would express past most stops, but they'd also be stuck with having to change out the locomotive. Is that even a net positive on travel time?
Northeast Regionals are moving to dual-mode locomotives in a couple of years, so the diesel engine would fire up on-the-fly where the overhead of the NEC gives way to the third rail -only LIRR tracks. No engine swaps required.
 
 
Brightline West, billionaire investor Wes Eden’s 218-mile rail project to connect Las Vegas to suburban Los Angeles with electric bullet trains, is raising $2.5 billion from private investors with a tax-exempt bond offering as it seeks to launch passenger service by late 2028.
 
The federal funds will allow LOSSAN to add three new daily roundtrips between the two cities, increasing the total number of trips to 13.

Two trains will go into service in March, while the third will be deployed in November, officials said. The new service will help bring the Surfliner closer to hourly frequency between the cities.
 
The Scranton-to-NYC rail corridor project is one of the first five in the nation to advance to the second step of the three-step Corridor Identification and Development Program. Step two includes the completion of a Service Development Plan for the proposed route and serves as a precursor to the third step, which could deliver potentially hundreds of millions of dollars for rail construction and related work in advance of the Big Apple-bound trains running again.
[...]
Prior passenger rail service between Scranton and NYC shut down in 1970. Restoring it — which could happen as early as 2028 or 2029, if plans come to fruition — has long been a goal of rail advocates and supportive elected officials alike.
 

FRA releases final report on their Amtrak Long-distance Route Revival study.

This is what they studied:
Network-of-Selected-Preferred-Route-Options_high_res-2048x1318.png


Not a chance 9/10ths of this actually gets built (in any Administration), but that's a pretty nice-looking map. Almost second-world status in terms of national connectivity.
 

FRA releases final report on their Amtrak Long-distance Route Revival study.

This is what they studied:
Network-of-Selected-Preferred-Route-Options_high_res-2048x1318.png


Not a chance 9/10ths of this actually gets built (in any Administration), but that's a pretty nice-looking map. Almost second-world status in terms of national connectivity.
Looks like a DFW and Denver hub or base forms out of all these proposals.
 

Caltrain’s Electric Fleet More Efficient than Expected​

“Caltrain announced at its monthly Board of Directors meeting that regenerative braking on the new trains is generating and sending back to the electric grid approximately 23% of the energy consumed by the system. The new electric trains are outperforming Caltrain’s original projections, which is welcome news for a public agency that holds sustainability as a core value.

Originally estimated to cost approximately $19.5 million annually, Caltrain’s electricity use since the launch of electric service averages 207 MWh on weekdays and 175 MWh on weekends, revising cost estimates to $16.5 million. With the agency expecting approximately $6 million annually in energy credits from the California Air Resources Board’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard Program, the first year of electric service will have lower fuel costs than the previous diesel service. Currently, Caltrain is providing that power to the grid free of charge as there is no legal requirement for the agency to be reimbursed for the energy generated….”

https://www.caltrain.com/news/caltrains-electric-fleet-more-efficient-expected
 
Awesome news. I read somewhere recently too that they no longer plan on having that stupid street running portion of the line anymore which is a huge win.
 
Awesome news. I read somewhere recently too that they no longer plan on having that stupid street running portion of the line anymore which is a huge win.
Without the street running is it a fully sealed corridor? If so I hope they shift to automated light metro, as the only remaining advantage of light rail would seem to be station cost.
 
It actually had a link to an earlier article talking about the plan to dig the tunnel to skip the road portion at the bottom of the article that was shared. Pretty convenient I didnt even have to look.

https://www.amny.com/nyc-transit/mta-tunnel-queens-cemetery-ibx-light-rail/

I’m so happy theyre considering this, the street running portion was just going to be such a bottleneck from day 1.

Without the street running is it a fully sealed corridor? If so I hope they shift to automated light metro, as the only remaining advantage of light rail would seem to be station cost.

Thats what it sounds like, it says with the tunnel it would be situated entirely within a dedicated right of way.


Sweet new render showing utrecht ave station too.
Screenshot-2024-09-22-155635.png
 
Last edited:
Are these to be some sort of battery powered LRVs, or was the artist just lazy?
 
So why are they using low floor vehicles then?
I don't think it's a fully formed idea. If they do decide to tunnel the section by the cemetery, then why go with LRT at all? 1 million people live within walking distance of this ROW and it will have connections to 17 subway lines and the LIR. That should be heavy rail and the only justification for not doing so would be the street running requirement.
 
I don't think it's a fully formed idea. If they do decide to tunnel the section by the cemetery, then why go with LRT at all? 1 million people live within walking distance of this ROW and it will have connections to 17 subway lines and the LIR. That should be heavy rail and the only justification for not doing so would be the street running requirement.

Yup. They havent decided yet if they are going to pull the trigger or not on the tunnel, so thats why theyre still showing the current plan of light rail vehicles. I agree though that if they do make it entirely grade seperated they need to go full heavy rail. More commonality of equipment, much higher capacity…etc. I have to imagine if they do go with the tunnel those questions will come up.
 

Back
Top