czsz
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2007
- Messages
- 6,043
- Reaction score
- 6
The dominate sex of a particular institution usually can be observed in the use of brick versus stone. For example Yale versus Wellesley.
What would Brown, Harvard, Columbia, and Amherst think of that?
I know there was a period of time in the 1920s when firms like McKim, Mead, and White were pushing a continental v. colonial American distinction in architecture for the sexes - men leaned more toward the neoclassical or Germanic, women toward a very homey, Puritan variant on Georgian. Never heard of the stone/brick distinction, though.
The future was... a city!
It still is. Coolidge has been accumulating tall buildings over time - but slowly.