Patrick Wrote:
Cambruidge is for all intents and purposes Boston. not to mention even if it stood on its own it still has a dramatically higher population. so does madison, which has a population in the 200,000 range, whereas we only have 64,000.
- I would argue that Madison is a good comparison to Portland.... 53 square miles, which is very similar to Portland, just more population in the City because Madison is much more dense. The MSA's are similar too, with Madison being only slightly smaller.
Patrick also Wrote:
anyway, the fact remains that cities like portland are the exception and not the rule and that was my point. cities like portland give you a lot more flavor than their population would suggest they should, and it comes at a lower price (both in the cost of living and in associated hassle like traffic congestion etc.). thats my only point.
- I would agree, Portland is the exception and not the rule. I used to live in Rockford, IL for a year or so, and Portland deffinately smokes Rockford, even tho Rockford had a higher population (150,000). The population was higher, but density was lower. The downtown, although it had a couple of 15 story buildings and a nice little skyline, was dead at night. Downtown revival has yet to hit Rockford, although when it does Rockford will be pretty neat. Anyhow, if all small/medium sized cities had the density and amenities of Portland or Madison, I might even consider living in one. I'm still suprised you didn't like Boston more than you did Patrick.... For somebody who likes cities as much as yourself, I would have thought you would have liked it more.
Cambruidge is for all intents and purposes Boston. not to mention even if it stood on its own it still has a dramatically higher population. so does madison, which has a population in the 200,000 range, whereas we only have 64,000.
- I would argue that Madison is a good comparison to Portland.... 53 square miles, which is very similar to Portland, just more population in the City because Madison is much more dense. The MSA's are similar too, with Madison being only slightly smaller.
Patrick also Wrote:
anyway, the fact remains that cities like portland are the exception and not the rule and that was my point. cities like portland give you a lot more flavor than their population would suggest they should, and it comes at a lower price (both in the cost of living and in associated hassle like traffic congestion etc.). thats my only point.
- I would agree, Portland is the exception and not the rule. I used to live in Rockford, IL for a year or so, and Portland deffinately smokes Rockford, even tho Rockford had a higher population (150,000). The population was higher, but density was lower. The downtown, although it had a couple of 15 story buildings and a nice little skyline, was dead at night. Downtown revival has yet to hit Rockford, although when it does Rockford will be pretty neat. Anyhow, if all small/medium sized cities had the density and amenities of Portland or Madison, I might even consider living in one. I'm still suprised you didn't like Boston more than you did Patrick.... For somebody who likes cities as much as yourself, I would have thought you would have liked it more.