Quaker Lane + Congress Square | Downtown

12345

Active Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
475
Reaction score
34
Fidelity's HQ may go high

Fidelity Investments has started exploring the possible sale of its former headquarters block in downtown Boston, a storied site that’s expected to draw significant interest because it could be redeveloped with an office tower up to 400 feet tall.

The company hired broker CBRE New England to market its longtime home at 82 Devonshire St. and three adjacent buildings, either for sale or lease. And Fidelity’s team recently met with city planners to test the waters to see how developers could rework the property within zoning rules.

“Given its desirable location in the heart of the Financial District and on the edge of Downtown Crossing, we believe there are a number of attractive options for the buildings,” said Fidelity spokesman Vin Loporchio.

http://bostonherald.com/business/real_estate/2013/02/fidelitys_hq_may_go_high
 

itchy

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
1,042
Reaction score
18
Re: Fidelity's HQ may go high

Agree. Hopefully any new construction there would be an addition rather than replacement.
 

awood91

Active Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2006
Messages
259
Reaction score
58
Re: Fidelity's HQ may go high

I think the ideal redevelopment scheme would be to convert the existing buildings into residential to serve as a base for a condo tower as big/tall as the market will allow. Condo units as opposed to rentals or at least a mix of both because there are already a ton of rental units coming online soon.

Benefits:

Converting the existing space will take obsolete office space off the market.

Adding residential units in the financial district would shift the area towards a more mixed use environment which I think the city and public finally understands makes for vital areas.

Boston is kicking ass right now!!
 

JSic

Active Member
Joined
May 25, 2006
Messages
625
Reaction score
28
Re: Fidelity's HQ may go high

Fidelity should get an 800 footer with a sign on top like the Pru and State Street. Its a Boston-based company, they should get that perk. Putnam as well.
 

DBM

Active Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2012
Messages
779
Reaction score
91
Re: Fidelity's HQ may go high

Fidelity should get an 800 footer with a sign on top like the Pru and State Street. Its a Boston-based company, they should get that perk. Putnam as well.
Did you even read the article?! Fidelity is SELLING the building. By definition, there will not be Fidelity-advertising sign placed on top of whatever gets developed there.

(Not only that, but Fidelity, though "Boston-based," of course, is famous for having sent thousands of jobs out of state to RI, etc., making your misplaced aspiration even more ironic.)
 

meddlepal

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Messages
1,547
Reaction score
259
Re: Fidelity's HQ may go high

Did you even read the article?! Fidelity is SELLING the building. By definition, there will not be Fidelity-advertising sign placed on top of whatever gets developed there.

(Not only that, but Fidelity, though "Boston-based," of course, is famous for having sent thousands of jobs out of state to RI, etc., making your misplaced aspiration even more ironic.)
Not to mention it clearly states in the article that the height ceiling is 400ft.
 

JSic

Active Member
Joined
May 25, 2006
Messages
625
Reaction score
28
Re: Fidelity's HQ may go high

Did you even read the article?! Fidelity is SELLING the building. By definition, there will not be Fidelity-advertising sign placed on top of whatever gets developed there.

(Not only that, but Fidelity, though "Boston-based," of course, is famous for having sent thousands of jobs out of state to RI, etc., making your misplaced aspiration even more ironic.)
Yes, I read the article. My point was irrespective of the article, that Boston companies like Fidelity and Putnam should be allowed to build tall, signature towers downtown. Maybe that would encourage them to stay in town and move their opertaions and jobs back up here.
 

type001

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2006
Messages
1,607
Reaction score
48
Re: Fidelity's HQ may go high

400 feet?? It's literally in the middle of the Goddam financial district. Biggest lost opportunity right there. Am I only one that thinks this?

Regardless, that building best be preserved. That will be the saving grace for whatever turd gets put on top of it.

Edit: Atwood91 has a good perspective on this.
 

Shepard

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2009
Messages
3,506
Reaction score
38
Re: Fidelity's HQ may go high

So do we think Fidelity will be looking to lease in existing class A space or build something new for themselves elsewhere?
 

choo

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2008
Messages
1,276
Reaction score
1
Re: Fidelity's HQ may go high

I'd be surprised if Fidelity wants to make a landmark investment in Boston. While I would certainly welcome it, it would be counter to every move they have made over the last ten years.

Also, I don't think residential could get the rents that office could here. Maybe our own version of chicago's Hancock tower with residential and office would be good. Why can't that be 800' right here?
 

shmessy

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
1,537
Reaction score
183
Re: Fidelity's HQ may go high

Yes, I read the article. My point was irrespective of the article, that Boston companies like Fidelity and Putnam should be allowed to build tall, signature towers downtown. Maybe that would encourage them to stay in town and move their opertaions and jobs back up here.
If you've been following Fidelity's trajectory the past few years, you would understand that they are tiptoeing out of Massachusetts as fast as they can towards Rhode Island, NH, Texas, etc..

They are simply NOT going in the direction you are dreaming. It's time to get over it. Boston has.
 

atlantaden

Senior Member
Joined
May 31, 2006
Messages
2,142
Reaction score
150
Re: Fidelity's HQ may go high

So, what are the major limiting factors here in regards to height? Shadows on the Common? FAA? Or is it just some arbitrary zoning number?
 

bigeman312

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2012
Messages
1,518
Reaction score
14
Re: Fidelity's HQ may go high

400 feet?? It's literally in the middle of the Goddam financial district. Biggest lost opportunity right there. Am I only one that thinks this?
Hopefully they are speculating and throwing out a bad number, because if for some reason that lot is only able to be zoned for up to 400 feet it would be a travesty. Here are the heights of nearby buildings:

One Boston Place (2 blocks away) - 601 feet
One International Place (4 blocks away) - 600 feet
Two International Place (5 blocks away) - 538 feet
One Post Office Square (1 block away) - 525 feet
One Federal St (2 blocks away) - 520 feet
Exchange Place (1 block away) - 510 feet
60 State St (2 blocks away) - 509 feet
One Beacon Street (4 blocks away) - 505 feet
28 State St (2 blocks away) - 500 feet
33 Arch Street (2 blocks away) - 477 feet
225 Franklin (2 blocks away) - 477 feet

This lot should be zoned for at least 600 feet or as tall as the FAA would allow. A signature 650+ footer would be perfectly contextual.
 

TallIsGood

Active Member
Joined
May 30, 2006
Messages
400
Reaction score
20
Re: Fidelity's HQ may go high

Fidelity proposed building a tall headquarters building on that location back in the 1980s. The owners of Exchange Place successfully fought it since it would harm their views. There is an old drawing of it somewhere, I'll try to dig it up.
 

TallIsGood

Active Member
Joined
May 30, 2006
Messages
400
Reaction score
20
Re: Fidelity's HQ may go high

Here are the renderings I have of the previously proposed Fidelity HQ on that site.



 

dirtywater

Active Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2006
Messages
611
Reaction score
14
Re: Fidelity's HQ may go high

Fidelity considered building a tower in the 1980's but, I believe, dropped the idea on its own before there was much of a battle with Exchange Place or anyone else. Exchange Place (or some of the tenants led by Goodwin Procter) fought against 75 State Street resulting in a shorter, squatter building than what was originally proposed and what the BRA was prepared to approve.
 

found5dollar

Active Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2007
Messages
992
Reaction score
37
Re: Fidelity's HQ may go high

I think people are forgettign the boston rule with this building "Zone the building short so that if you need or want to build tall you need a variance. Through the variance discussion the city gets something out of you."
 

AmericanFolkLegend

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
2,147
Reaction score
5
Re: Fidelity's HQ may go high

So, what are the major limiting factors here in regards to height? Shadows on the Common? FAA? Or is it just some arbitrary zoning number?
Just some arbitrary number.
I believe the only spaces zoned for taller than 400 feet are the PDA at the Filene's crater and some air rights parcels (SST, Copley Tower, etc.). So the fact that this building is located in the tallest as-of-right zoning district in the city makes it very likely that they'll either:
1. Create a PDA and zone it taller. Or,
2. Grant variances for more height in exchange for some extortion (civic space, linkage funds, etc.).
People shouldn't be freaked out by the 400 number.
 

Brad Plaid

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
1,081
Reaction score
286
Re: Fidelity's HQ may go high

Here are the renderings I have of the previously proposed Fidelity HQ on that site.



A major bullet was dodged here. This would have ended up as much of a cartoon as 500 Boylston.
 

Top