- Joined
- May 25, 2006
- Messages
- 6,993
- Reaction score
- 1,710
Re: South Station Tower
I disagree. I think it is imperative that such an important transportation link be connected to as many modes of transportation as possible and South Station is at the top of the list. When I take the bus to Boston I am glad that without even having to go outside (well, outside of the facility) I can connect to almost anywhere in the region (even the world if I take the Silver Line to Logan.) My foot doesn't have to touch the ground.
I wouldn't say you are wrong to think it isn't ideal, after all we do have 3 major train stations in the city. It probably would make sense for a bus terminal at Back Bay station as well.
My concern is that it needs to be expanded and that was a major part of the SST plan. The Postal building can move and the railroad platforms can be expanded into the space with enough spacing to allow for new development but the bus terminal is different, though just as crucial.
I disagree. I think it is imperative that such an important transportation link be connected to as many modes of transportation as possible and South Station is at the top of the list. When I take the bus to Boston I am glad that without even having to go outside (well, outside of the facility) I can connect to almost anywhere in the region (even the world if I take the Silver Line to Logan.) My foot doesn't have to touch the ground.
I wouldn't say you are wrong to think it isn't ideal, after all we do have 3 major train stations in the city. It probably would make sense for a bus terminal at Back Bay station as well.
My concern is that it needs to be expanded and that was a major part of the SST plan. The Postal building can move and the railroad platforms can be expanded into the space with enough spacing to allow for new development but the bus terminal is different, though just as crucial.