They should be noted as ‘canceled/on hold’ but I don’t see the need to remove them from the public record. Though I wouldn’t bet on it happening any time soon the projects could come back in the future. This was already the second time around for Copley and I’m sure there are other projects like 40 Trinity that will go on ice only to re-emerge in better times.Ah, good clarifications, thanks! I'm annoyed and surprised that the BPDA project managers can't be bothered (at least in the case of the two projects you cite above) to delete filings after the proposals go kaput. How hard can it be to practice such an elemental act of good archival hygiene?