Weird google maps

Shepard

Shepard

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2009
Messages
3,518
Reaction score
65
Google maps has given what appears to me a strange designation for certain routes I never knew existed... The Seaport/Northern Ave bridge is labelled "N380", as is the entire South Boston Bypass and the elevated part of D Street all the way to Fish Pier.

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&sou....353902,-71.049641&spn=0.002121,0.004812&z=18

I-93 southbound frontage is given as "N433"

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&sou...2.336167,-71.06531&spn=0.004243,0.009624&z=17

Columbia Road near I-93 is called "N120"

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&sou....321644,-71.053691&spn=0.004244,0.009624&z=17

Also, all of Beacon Hill is shown as parkland.

BC, Harvard and MIT (and possibly others, not BU though) are showing all university buildings.

Another change seems to include property boundaries.

And I'm seeing a lot more detail on railroad tracks.

Ch-ch-ch-changes....
 
Haha ftw?

I always like when they update Google Maps but this is strange.

Check it, they added building lots for the rest of the city.
 
As a Gmaps junkie, I can tell you they've had lot boundaries in Australia for at least 6 months, and probably longer.
 
Shepard said:
Also, all of Beacon Hill is shown as parkland.
Click to expand...

It appears that this is becuase it's a national historic landmark. I just checked a few other sites that clearly aren't 'parks' and they have the same shade of green.

I just noticed that in Portland they have labeled Monument Square as a shopping center and seem to have added a pond...

 
Shepard said:
Also, all of Beacon Hill is shown as parkland.

.
Click to expand...

About 1/3 of Downtown New Bedford is shown as parkland because the "Whaling District" section is a National Historic Park. However, shading it green makes it appear as if there's a large, green park with gridlike streets in the center of town.
 
Looks like MIT had some heavy expansion while BU shrunk.
 
Does google maps have a way to turn off unverified user-added content? I was very surprised the other day to find the Empire State Building on fifth ave in Park Slope, Brooklyn.
 
Thanks, Frank. I dunno, though. It might be real labels based on some sort of real designation, or it may just be on the basis of a random spreadsheet that google may or may not have mined online somewhere. It seems like gmaps is going through a convulsion of automated updates based on search. I really hope the human quality control kicks in... otherwise those of you who live in JP will be directing your guests onto "MBTA Green Line Suspended South."

As an aside, when the first online maps came out, the directions in Boston often took the Charles River to be a road. Take Massachusetts Ave to Charles River, Turn Right...
 
I'd saw Google screwed the pooch on this one (instead of "that chicken").
 
Government center is a green park
The greenway is I-93
The synagogue in Charles River Park is called the Charles River Dam Bridge
The actual Charles River Dam is shown as a park

Where's the outrage?!
 
In many places (CT and RI anyway), Route 1A is also Route 1. They don't make the distinction.
 
Shepard said:
Government center is a green park
The greenway is I-93
The synagogue in Charles River Park is called the Charles River Dam Bridge
The actual Charles River Dam is shown as a park

Where's the outrage?!
Click to expand...

It's like a NIMBY fantasy map of Boston. Highways on top of one another for easy auto access and traffic-flowing ease. Parks everywhere.

(Even those picky Charlestown NIMBYs who fought against the naming of the Zakim Bridge are appeased by the removal of a synogogue...)
 
bcecmistake.jpg


Interesting view of the BCEC. Thanks Google Maps - this will help me the next time I want to find the intersection of C St and Clalflin...

Were those the street alignments before the mammoth convention center took over? If so, the shame is that the small-footprint grid of Fort Point could easily have been continued on this giant parcel.
 
I'll admit that the preponderance of variations from reailty seem like errors on Google's part, but mapmakers historically have included bogus streets, mislabeled addresses, etc., so as to be able to identify illegally made copies in copyright infringement cases. Like I said, that probably doesn't explain all the problems with Google Maps, but it could explain some of the more obvious ones (a pond in a part where none exists, etc.).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top