RandomWalk
Senior Member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2014
- Messages
- 3,073
- Reaction score
- 4,333
It’s right across the street from where Patrick Barrett wanted his spot zoning for more of those spendy buggers.
I grew up about 3 blocks from there, and this development certainly highlights the housing cost crisis. I remember when I was in 8th grade in 1963, a friend of my dad's bought a house for his family on Rindge Ave for $10,000. A well maintained 3 bedroom house with a dining room, nice backyard, etc. It's crazy.It’s right across the street from where Patrick Barrett wanted his spot zoning for more of those spendy buggers.
He got it; since it's not even been brought to planning board I've been holding off starting a thread about it until then. that filing is expected to be in December, and the working plan is that the existing building at 2400 Mass ave will be demolished by July 24 with the last tenants moving out by June.It’s right across the street from where Patrick Barrett wanted his spot zoning for more of those spendy buggers.
The density part is fine. It's just the crazy offset stacks everywhere and the container type siding that bothers me.Realistically, Mass Ave needs that level of density all the way from Porter to Alewife Brook. However, this is spot zoned and the CCC crowd (which Barrett has been supportive of) has tried to shout down the build at Daru Kebab. I suppose the difference is affordable vs market rate.
I tend to agree, but I'll agree even more when I see exotic buildings like this going up in Belmont, Winchester, and Arlington.We need more weird looking f-ed up buildings. I think this looks cool, and Mass Ave definitely needs more height.
In what world would that happen?! LolI tend to agree, but I'll agree even more when I see exotic buildings like this going up in Belmont, Winchester, and Arlington.
Why do Belmont, Winchester, and Arlington. get to be preserved as ye olde New England museum towns, but not North Cambridge? Not that I want North Cambridge to be that way, but it seems elitist that the blue bloods in the wealthier burgs get to calcify their town into some yesteryear version of the 19th century, while more working class communities like North Cambridge are fair game for any carnival side show act (architecturally speaking) that rolls into town. The elitism of that dynamic rubs me the wrong way.In what world would that happen?! Lol
Why do Belmont, Winchester, and Arlington. get to be preserved as ye olde New England museum towns, but not North Cambridge? Not that I want North Cambridge to be that way, but it seems elitist that the blue bloods in the wealthier burgs get to calcify their town into some yesteryear version of the 19th century, while more working class communities like North Cambridge are fair game for any carnival side show act (architecturally speaking) that rolls into town. The elitism of that dynamic rubs me the wrong way.
LOL. Yeah, Arlington isn't as stodgy as some of the others. Not that this is anything great. The North Cambridge proposal discussed above actually looks better.
Really classy addition to my old childhood neighborhood. But that traffic on Alewife Brook Pkwy (in the 2nd photo) is horrendous!
Really classy addition to my old childhood neighborhood. But that traffic on Alewife Brook Pkwy (in the 2nd photo) is horrendous!