10/31 Pretty sure this one is going faster than a floor a week, and has just blasted its way into Boston's Top 30. (~450'+ for the poured floors, higher for the core)
Also, this upper portion surprises me in that I didn't expect it to appear so wide from this perspective; not good or bad, yet, just unexpected.
Just searching through google images
Oh, that's bad, for sure. Another fat filing cabinet for downtown Boston...
to archboston - Verb - To complain that a building is either not tall enough, too "stumpy" and/or not as good as some building in New York, but when it's built, people say "It's not as bad as I thought it would be".
"I hear they're archbostoning the Winthrop on archboston.com"
Is there a cap on how fast it can rise based on curing times for the floors below? Yes, they have all of the additional, temporary supports, but I wonder if that caps the speed in which recently poured floors can take on the stress of x# additional floors above?
Winthrop Tower sits on land that is lower in elevation than MT. Considering how MT is only 6 ft shorter, it's likely WT will look shorter.Funny how Winthrop looks shorter in that pic when its supposed to be a few feet higher than Millennium.
IMG_6344 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6360 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6363 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6413 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6416 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6417 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6433 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6435 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6457 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6465 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6467 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6522 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6523 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6597 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6598 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6374 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6384 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6376 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6377 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6380 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6379 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6387 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6391 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6393 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6398 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6403 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6405 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_6406 by Bos Beeline, on FlickrWinthrop Tower sits on land that is lower in elevation than MT. Considering how MT is only 6 ft shorter, it's likely WT will look shorter.