Winthrop Center | 115 Winthrop Square | Financial District

Re: 115 Winthrop Square | Financial District

This thread derailed? They haven't even started building yet so how derailed could it be?
 
Re: 115 Winthrop Square | Financial District

TheRifleman said:
This thread derailed? They haven't even started building yet so how derailed could it be?
Click to expand...

If we aren't talking about the Tower (or stuff related to it) it's derailed.
 
Re: 115 Winthrop Square | Financial District

Is there anything scheduled meetings or hearings for this thing? Looking for some real news
 
Re: 115 Winthrop Square | Financial District

Thread should be locked at this point until there is actual news. It's devolved into "What's Happening with Project X?" mostly.
 
Re: 115 Winthrop Square | Financial District

Great summary of what's going on.
 
Re: 115 Winthrop Square | Financial District

Hubman said:
Thanks.
I had totally forgotten about the FAA. It'll be a wonder if this gets built at 775' feet.
Click to expand...

It would be a bigger miracle than Hanukkah.
 
Re: 115 Winthrop Square | Financial District

meddlepal said:
Thread should be locked at this point until there is actual news. It's devolved into "What's Happening with Project X?" mostly.
Click to expand...

Edit: Rude comment was rude.
 
Last edited:
Re: 115 Winthrop Square | Financial District

How many project threads are closed?
 
Re: 115 Winthrop Square | Financial District

statler said:
How many project threads are closed?
Click to expand...

I'm not sure, that post might have been a little harsh, not thinking clearly since I'm sick. Visiting this board usually a couple of times every day I have noticed lots of users calling for threads to be locked. Anyways, this wasn't a jab at you, I think you do a good job of modding the forums even if I believe threads should only be locked on rare occasions.
 
Re: Trans National Place (Winthrop Square) Part 2

Boston02124 said:
Boston has alway had an issue with hieght,Was'nt Boston the 1st city to ban skyscrapers? This is from 1988.I have the rest of the article if any one wants to read it.


xcranes030.jpg
Click to expand...



wtf

can you scan > image > text?
 
Re: Trans National Place (Winthrop Square) Part 2

Boston02124 said:
Boston has alway had an issue with hieght,Was'nt Boston the 1st city to ban skyscrapers? This is from 1988.I have the rest of the article if any one wants to read it.
xcranes030.jpg
Click to expand...

I guess the answer to that poster's question would be:
Yes, they do make for a dull skyline.
 
Re: 115 Winthrop Square | Financial District

SST + MT + 1 Dalton are BIG installments....

115 Fed, 1 Bromfield and Copley Square Tower will carry us over the top.

Quite interesting to see how far their perspective on height was so astonishingly out of whack. Mr assturd (Flynn) really derailed progress of height and density......
 
Last edited:
Re: 115 Winthrop Square | Financial District

odurandina said:
SST + MT + 1 Dalton are BIG installments....

115 Fed, 1 Bromfield and Copley Square Tower will carry us over the top.

Quite interesting to see how far their perspective on height was so astonishingly out of whack. Mr assturd (Flynn) really derailed progress of height and density......
Click to expand...

I would like to see 750-800Footer at SST
 
Re: 115 Winthrop Square | Financial District

KentXie said:
Not allowed by FAA. Please move on and stop de-railing the thread.
Click to expand...

Like I said we have a small group of insecure bloggers on this site that constantly attack other people views that are not agreeable to their own.

NICE

Please just put me on ignore if I bother you so much.
 
Re: 115 Winthrop Square | Financial District

TheRifleman said:
Like I said we have a small group of insecure bloggers on this site that constantly attack other people views that are not agreeable to their own.

NICE

Please just put me on ignore if I bother you so much.
Click to expand...

Please stop de-railing thread.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top