Winthrop Center | 115 Winthrop Square | Financial District

At the risk of opening up a can of worms...would it have killed them to raise the mechanical screen by 10-feet and make it a 700+ foot building?! :rolleyes:

FAA would have capped it at 697'. If you want to complain about losing out on 700'+ buildings, complain about 1 Bromfield, Hurley, North Station area, Back Bay area, and a bunch of Kendall plots including a piece of Volpe and Constellation Center.
 
FAA would have capped it at 697'. If you want to complain about losing out on 700'+ buildings, complain about 1 Bromfield, Hurley, North Station area, Back Bay area, and a bunch of Kendall plots including a piece of Volpe and Constellation Center.

My mistake. For some reason, I thought the FAA was giving them up to 725' on this site.
 
View from One Financial today:

IMG-4862.jpg
 
This makes a great addition to the skyline from the Common/Public Garden now. At first I didn't expect it to show, so I thought it was the Parker.
 

Attachments

  • 20211124_124051.jpg
    20211124_124051.jpg
    2.3 MB · Views: 278
Remember how people used to cite "Manhattanization" as a terrible worry to avoid at all costs? I wonder if they object to this project's very constrained/dense site and how it comes up so close to its neighbors.

We covered this pretty exhaustively, upthread, just a month ago.

To summarize, the abutting owner of 75-101 Fed. objected strenuously, in a lengthy and highly technical comment letter to the BPDA, about exactly this ("very constrained/dense site").

The cognitive dissonance here is that, said owner of 75-101 Fed. owns dozens of massive, extremely tall office towers nationwide themselves. Thus, they are as far from the traditional stereotype of a "Manhattanization" complainer as one could get.

At least, that's based on my perception that those (rightly ridiculed and mocked) for bewailing the alleged "Manhattanization" syndrome are generally highly-wealthy Baby Boomer residents of Brookline, Back Bay, Cambridge, JP, Lexington, Milton, Newton, South End, and similarly affluent, somewhat high-density/quasi-urban Route 128 belt zip codes, who, having come of age in the workforce from ca. 1965-1985, during the dark valley of white flight/suburbanization/"car is king"/extreme urban crisis, simply cannot wrap their Boomer noggins around the reality that Boston, having recovered from the half-century of exodus, malinvestment, and malaise, can actually, you know... grow again.

Do you really mean to label a commercial property owner that owns tens of billions of assets in skyscrapers nationwide as an entity that fears "Manhattanization"? (as opposed to all of the Back Bay, etc., residents who ridiculously complained about this project's "shadow impact"?) I assume not...
 
IMG_8308 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_8307 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_8309 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_8320 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_8323 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_8324 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_8327 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_8330 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_8334 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_8337 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
Tower crane jump coming soon.
IMG_8336 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_8346 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_8349 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_8351 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_8356 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_8358 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
 

Back
Top