FortPointer
New member
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2022
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 18
Virtually nothing that the developer committed to in the winning bid, or presented in public meetings over the course of a year-and-a-half, as it regarded programming subsidies to be directed to the Great Hall (or later The Connector), was codified into enforceable legal agreements until after the project was permitted. Some of it was in one or more Cooperation Agreements. CA's aren't signed until after projects are approved by BPDA Board. As far as I'm aware, the hours of access weren't in any agreement until the M&O agreement signed by BPDA and Millennium in January 2024. It's BPDA's job to convert commitments to obligations.Fortpointer, thanks for joining the conversation on this website. I've also been following this closely but would be interested in your take on what you mean by "promised" versus generally disclosed in a filing. Are the previous claims enforceable by BPDA or under contract law? Should they be? Clearly the operating hours issue was in an enforceable contract and the BPDA letter clearly did enough to get the hall open.
To be more succinct, what could be done, in your opinion, to avoid this from happening in the future?
I'd also withhold judgment on the success of the development until known tenants move in and the park is open. But yes, currently not up to expectations.
To DZH22's comment, "You joined Archboston on 12/29/2022:" I used to be active around a decade ago as "Sicilian." And I followed the conversation during Winthrop Square permitting.