it's an election yearkind of embarrassing
it's an election yearkind of embarrassing
The T should really stop using "soon" or "major step toward" in their pressers - it's misleading at best and distrusting at worst for a skeptical public.That press release says the the new higher speeds wouldn't start immediately after the shutdown. The upgrades they did were just a "major step" towards being able to go 55 mph, but there is still other work to be done. You shouldn't expect any speed-ups yet.
There was also quite a bit of bad blood between Milton and the T about the station. The MBTA failed to properly maintain the staircase and closed it in 2018. After 4 years, Milton threatened to sue to get it repaired; instead, the MBTA demolished it rather than do a larger renovation. Never mind everything about the MBTA Communities Act. Sending Eng seems like a deliberate gesture of good faith.it's an election year
It was essentially the major entrance to the station from the street and shops there. Now that they have an ADA ramp does this mean they can finally restore the stair case? Should just move the station under the overpass, put in real entrances, and sell a bunch of air rights developments on top. Milton will love it.There was also quite a bit of bad blood between Milton and the T about the station. The MBTA failed to properly maintain the staircase and closed it in 2018. After 4 years, Milton threatened to sue to get it repaired; instead, the MBTA demolished it rather than do a larger renovation. Never mind everything about the MBTA Communities Act. Sending Eng seems like a deliberate gesture of good faith.
I don't know.... I read the presser and it looks very clear to me. They say (a few different ways) that the eventual speed-up is contingent on other upgrades. This doesn't look misleading at all. And I appreciate it when the T is clear about the goals and purpose of the work they're doing, especially around shutdowns.The T should really stop using "soon" or "major step toward" in their pressers - it's misleading at best and distrusting at worst for a skeptical public.
There's a lot of good that is coming about right now at the T when it comes to connecting the dots - they frequently use "soon" to mean actually immediately after a shutdown. This one was a miss.I don't know.... I read the presser and it looks very clear to me. They say (a few different ways) that the eventual speed-up is contingent on other upgrades. This doesn't look misleading at all. And I appreciate it when the T is clear about the goals and purpose of the work they're doing, especially around shutdowns.
The relative value of overnight maintenance does decrease when regular shutdowns can be expected, but also overnight maintenance is used to prep/stage for longer shutdowns. E.g., materials are often moved into place during the overnights for a week or so before a shutdown starts, so everything is ready to go once the trains fully stop running. This is most obvious with rail replacement, as you can often see the new rail showing up staged in the right-of-way sitting right between the to-be-replaced rails in the days leading up to a shutdown.A thought about the continuing use of longer shutdowns: They should trade the overnight windows for the longer shutdowns. Run overnight service on the core subways, with non-disruptive overnight work (e.g. light station maintenance) happening concurrently.
The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority has announced that starting Sunday, Orange Line subway service will run faster.
Interim Secretary and MBTA General Manager Phil Eng said the slow zones between Assembly Station and North Station are gone, and signals have been upgraded.
That means trains can travel at 55 miles per hour on the line North of North Station.
The MBTA made similar upgrades between Oak Grove Station and Assembly Station in 2025.
Riders can expect "shorter trip times and 76% more service every weekday compared to Winter 2023," Eng said.
Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey said she is grateful to Eng and MBTA workers, saying, "When we took office, we made a commitment to fix the T and deliver the faster, safer, and more reliable service that riders deserve. "
That's a pretty long stretch - what would be ultimate max be, 55 mph or maybe 60 mph?![]()
WBUR (@wbur.org)
More Red Line passengers can soon expect faster travel times. The MBTA will increase speeds from North Quincy to JFK to 50 miles an hour, MBTA General Manager and Interim Transportation Secretary Phil Eng said Thursday, as he also touted higher top speeds on the Orange Line. https://trib.al/kjvL0T4bsky.app
Honestly, I think it'll top out at 50. Worth remembering these speed increases are less "increase speeds from baseline" and more "restoring design speeds." I believe that large parts of OL were designed to operate at 55, while the RL extension was originally designed to operate at 50, and no higher. Increasing above 50 would probably take quite a bit more design and validation work that probably isn't in scope.That's a pretty long stretch - what would be ultimate max be, 55 mph or maybe 60 mph?
It's roughly 3.6 track miles from North Quincy to UMass. But the article also reveals that the T had already increased speeds to 50 mph from Braintree to N Quincy, which I had not realized. Taken together, that's 8.8 miles, which is very significant.That's a pretty long stretch - what would be ultimate max be, 55 mph or maybe 60 mph?
This is why we can't have nice things. The MBTA is footing the entire bill for accessibility improvements at all Newton stations. And the response? An elected neighborhood council is complaining about the "historic character and neighborhood impacts" of a canopy, that is next to a large transformer, doesn't even touch the existing historic building, and is part of a transit line that isn't running "historic" vehicles. I hope this group isn't given the time of day, but until state leaders start calling out how ridiculous this type of behavior is, the T will struggle to make necessary investments as quickly or cheaply as they otherwise would.
I'd really like to see some more focus on this for the green line. The Lechmere Viaduct renovation was specced for 40mph operation but trains are still limited to 25.![]()
WBUR (@wbur.org)
More Red Line passengers can soon expect faster travel times. The MBTA will increase speeds from North Quincy to JFK to 50 miles an hour, MBTA General Manager and Interim Transportation Secretary Phil Eng said Thursday, as he also touted higher top speeds on the Orange Line. https://trib.al/kjvL0T4bsky.app
Other than the Riverside Line, I am not sure how much benefit there is on rated speed increases on the Green Line. Speed on much of the line is controlled by stop spacing and other safety factors like curves, slopes (tunnel to North Station, for example).I'd really like to see some more focus on this for the green line. The Lechmere Viaduct renovation was specced for 40mph operation but trains are still limited to 25.
If I remember correctly I think thats a combination derailment issue with the Breda Type 8s and the heavier trainsets. I know they shored up the viaduct to support the increased weight but higher speeds would mean higher forces. And on the 8s they might be playing it safe on an old bridge structure with them to avoid even the derailment potentialI'd really like to see some more focus on this for the green line. The Lechmere Viaduct renovation was specced for 40mph operation but trains are still limited to 25.
I have to guess the MBTA is making the canopy a requirement alongside the ramp to prevent primarily snow/ice from accumulating on the ramp, rather than relying on the reliability of maintenance and snow-clearing contracts to ensure the ramp remains clear and accessible at all times.. but the project probably doesn't have the budget for a nicer canopy than this off-the-shelf looking one..Why is the canopy needed at all? There already is a canopy under the historic station building.