Norval Elliot
New member
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2019
- Messages
- 80
- Reaction score
- 43
The FCC requires stations to identify their call letters and COL hourly. Call signs are not used to measure audience levels in PPM markets, however. Thus, stations market their brand nowadays (e.g., "92.5 The River," "Rock 92.9," "Magic 106.7," and suchlike). As a result, many young listeners are indifferent to or altogether unaware of a station's legal ID.
Certain heritage calls still carry some weight. Consider, for example, WBZ, whose call letters designate a trichotomy of separately owned stations: AM (iHeart), FM (Beasley), and TV (ViacomCBS). "WBZ" figures prominently in the branding of NewsRadio 1030 and Channel 4. (Recall the disastrous attempt a few years ago to brand WBZ-TV as "CBS 4.") That said, "WBZ" is far less conspicuous in "98.5 The Sports Hub."
To me, "WGBH" represented a venerable, nationally recognized brand. The W-less triplet, on the other hand, seems to be an arrogant, forced attempt to forge an identity à la NPR and PBS. How much audience-supported funding was wasted on this rebranding?
Certain heritage calls still carry some weight. Consider, for example, WBZ, whose call letters designate a trichotomy of separately owned stations: AM (iHeart), FM (Beasley), and TV (ViacomCBS). "WBZ" figures prominently in the branding of NewsRadio 1030 and Channel 4. (Recall the disastrous attempt a few years ago to brand WBZ-TV as "CBS 4.") That said, "WBZ" is far less conspicuous in "98.5 The Sports Hub."
To me, "WGBH" represented a venerable, nationally recognized brand. The W-less triplet, on the other hand, seems to be an arrogant, forced attempt to forge an identity à la NPR and PBS. How much audience-supported funding was wasted on this rebranding?