LinkThe Herald said:Garage on the skids! Critic: It crumbled ?cuz city fumbled
By Scott Van Voorhis
Boston Herald Business Reporter
Tuesday, May 8, 2007
Nearly half of a city-owned parking garage in the heart of Boston?s financial district has been condemned, raising new questions about City Hall?s oversight of a key asset.
City inspectors cordoned off the bottom two floors of the 1950s-era Winthrop Square garage after an review last week found concrete peeling away from its supports, officials said.
However, news of the garage?s crumbling condition comes on the heels of a critical report on the city?s oversight of the garage by a municipal finance watchdog group.
City officials are receiving just $76,875 a year from a garage that should be contributing anywhere from $2.5 million to $3 million a year to city coffers, the Boston Finance Commission recently reported.
The garage is in the center of the city?s business district, right across Federal Street from the old Bank of Boston tower, now home to Bank of America. It has been slated for eventual demolition to make way for Mayor Thomas M. Menino?s plan for a 1,000-foot tower that would become the centerpiece of the Hub?s skyline.
Menino?s press secretary, Dot Joyce, argued that the garage?s current woes simply reinforce the city?s decision to redevelop the property into a large tower complex. She also said the city has kept an eye on the garage?s condition, with structural tests a year ago.
In the meantime, city officials have said they plan to make changes when the garage?s lease expires this summer.
?We are not in the business of running garages,? Joyce said.
But some are questioning whether City Hall has fallen short in overseeing the garage, from its finances to basic safety.
?Certainly letting the garage disintegrate is the more serious of the problems,? said Shirley Kressell, head of the Alliance of Boston Neighborhoods. ?It?s basic stuff. What can you say??
LinklThe Herald said:Talk is cheap, but where are tower payments? Belkin hasn?t coughed up
By Scott Van Voorhis
Boston Herald Business Reporter
Wednesday, May 9, 2007
City Hall insists that Tommy?s Tower is for real.
There?s no reason at all to doubt that the mayor?s vision of a 1,000-foot tower rising above Boston?s skyline is right on schedule, I?m told.
After all, local businessman Steve Belkin has been showing off stunning renderings of what would be the city?s tallest tower, and with a park on top. He wants to start work next year, in time to open his 80-story behemoth in 2011.
But one sure way of proving it?s a serious plan would be to start showing weary city taxpayers the money.
Belkin unveiled plans for his billion-dollar tower last fall. In January, Mayor Thomas M. Menino gave his official blessing to Belkin?s proposal to replace a crumbling, city-owned parking garage with a Renzo Piano-designed tower.
So far, so good.
So the next step, one might assume, would be a check for the site, or at least a little downpayment, right?
Not exactly.
While word is the garage is worth as much as $70 million, there is no deadline yet for Belkin to make his first payment, city officials acknowledge. The property, which has been eyed for a possible sale by city officials for years, is still being assessed.
Nor is there any timeline for when Belkin?s first payment for the garage site might be made, either.
All of which sounds odd given that Belkin, the tower?s would-be developer, has been freely talking up plans to begin work next year.
But it gets stranger.
Menino?s blessing in January was supposed to have triggered a chain of payments to the city, eventually culminating with Belkin owning the garage site.
The mayor, in a press release, recommended to the Boston Redevelopment Authority that Belkin be ?tentatively designated? as the developer.
With tentative designation, Belkin was to pay 1 percent of the purchase price. Another 24 percent was to have been paid 90 days later upon formal designation.
Based on an estimated value of $70 million - that?s roughly $17 million - nothing to sneeze at as city officials scramble for a million here and a million there to put extra cops on the streets.
But a funny thing happened on the way to designation.
Four months and counting, City Hall?s development arm, not known for refusing to carry out the mayor?s marching orders, has yet to implement his recommendation.
A spokeswoman for the Boston Redevelopment Authority blamed complicated negotiations, but insisted everything is on track.
Still, when it comes to any business deal, nothing says it like cold, hard cash.
sbvanvoorhis@bostonherald.com
Lrfox said:Please, someone correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't this still have to go through a bunch of hoops before it's actually approved? I mean why would Belkin finalize (or even put a down payment on for that matter) the sale of a lot that it's not certain he can develop as he wants?
The Weekly Dig said:"Taking a Bath"
Big building won?t stop making big waves
* by Paul McMorrow
* Issue 9.20
* Wed, May 16, 2007
Good news, everybody! Tom Menino?s 1,000-foot Winthrop Square tower?the one that?s going to look like a big middle finger on the skyline?isn?t a force for evil anymore! Menino and City Councilor Sam Yoon struck a deal last week that turns the city-owned Winthrop Square parcel into an instrument of the people.
There?s a decrepit garage sitting on the land now. Starting in July, the Boston Redevelopment Authority (BRA) will take the garage?s revenue and use it to pay for the Boston Housing Authority (BHA) police force. When the BRA eventually sells the garage to make way for developer Steve Belkin?s wicked big tower, money from the land sale will go toward fixing up decrepit BHA buildings.
Menino and Yoon make for an odd pairing. But forget, for a moment, the seeming absurdity of a vocal good-government advocate cutting a hush-hush deal with the mayor and the BRA behind closed doors (the BRA being the very same agency that Yoon and his Team Unity colleagues are currently pillorying because it refuses to abide by recent agreements it has struck with the City Council.) There are far larger questions in play here.
It?s no surprise that Menino?s looking for assets to liquefy. The war in Iraq has monopolized federal budget writers? attention, and the feds have left Boston?s mayor holding the tab for a number of line items that they used to bankroll?public housing and community policing chief among them.
Along comes the Winthrop Square garage. It just so happens that with the amount of money the garage should generate, Menino could pay for the BHA?s cops for the next two years. Menino takes his oval peg, pounds away at it until it?s lodged into a circular hole, and calls it a nice fit.
Born of necessity, the arrangement is far from ideal, and certainly untenable?two years from now, we?ll be looking around Boston for something else to pawn. But it?s not like the mayor had a lot of other options.
Still, the deal came together disconcertingly quietly. And while Menino was working to identify creative revenue streams for public housing, most of the city assumed he was cooking up a way to hand the Winthrop parcel to the BRA, so the imageagency could take all that money for themselves.
Three months ago, the Boston Finance Commission (FinCom)?an agency appointed by the governor to watch over city finances?issued a scathing report, warning that the BRA was preparing to seize Winthrop Square by eminent domain, and pocketing the substantial windfall that will follow the parcel?s sale. It implied that whenever Menino sees a chance to leverage public assets to satisfy personal desires, he takes it, and Winthrop Square presented just such an opportunity.
?But for that Finance Commission report, and the city council, the BRA would already be collecting that $2.5 million a year,? says one City Hall official.
Still, as Menino works to get ground broken on the tower, things will only get tougher?and, potentially, more embarrassing.
?The city?s already at a disadvantage,? says a second City Hall official. ?The fact that, after a worldwide search, nobody else stepped up and bid probably tells you it?s a bad idea.?
This official suspects that Belkin is having trouble making his profit margins fall into place, and that when the developer begins seeking every tax break and give-back in the book in order to break ground, the city will ?wind up taking a bath to get it done.?
Indeed, most observers now take it for granted that the tower?s property tax bills will wind up being significantly lower than once promised; the larger question now is whether the BRA will wind up chopping the sale price of the parcel?and, in the process, devalue the compact between Yoon, the BRA and the BHA.
On the other hand, observers also believe Menino is likely to squeeze Belkin for every community benefit he can extract.
?Belkin has been designated as the developer by the BRA, but he hasn?t made any payments,? says Councilor Jerry McDermott. ?And you?ve got 12 council members sitting here scratching their heads, looking for money for street workers, police and basic city services.? As the requests for handouts pile up, the developer?s tab climbs, making it harder for him to work within his margins. Last week?s BHA compact will only increase these pressures, as interest groups frozen out of the deal cry out for a piece of the action.
Add to that the fact that tower plans call for a block of Devonshire Street to be seized, ripped up and converted into a park?a significant alteration of downtown traffic patterns that, when noticed at all, hasn?t sat well with the city councilors who have to approve the transaction. It could prove to be a significant sticking point.
?My focus is not on the tower; it?s on what we do with the garage when it?s not a tower, which will be for a while,? Yoon said last week.
How long will that while last? It may be a long while, indeed.