bigeman312
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2012
- Messages
- 2,284
- Reaction score
- 2,149
How very Hamiltonian of you. Literally though, your point is the point of the Federalists going back to 1787. Not that I disagree with you. The structural two-party system contributes to voter disengagement and disinterest in a major way as well.
I'm aware. And I know that is not a mainstream point-of-view.
It's not a farce. The elections are certainly real. The problem is people's perceptions of these elections. A lack of understanding of history and what primaries are for: the party members deciding who will be their figureheads on election day. Our winner-take-all voting system doesn't help matters when there's a huge slate of candidates and the "front-runner" wins with 30-40% of the vote in most states. Legitimacy is in the eye of the beholder.
This is true and a more accurate representation of the state of affairs. But it should also be noted that the "lack of understanding" is partially systemic. The entire reason why we have had nation-wide primaries in recent decades is to give voters the feeling that they have a say. Politicians didn't want a repeat of 1968. The Democratic and Republican parties are purposefully disingenuous (or maybe obscure may be more accurate) as to the voters' role in the nominating process.