IMG_4361 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_4366 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_4368 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_8546 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_8549 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_8548 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_8550 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_8551 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_8552 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_1286 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_1296 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_1298 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_1299 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_5024 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_5031 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_5033 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_5034 by Bos Beeline, on FlickrYup, a very gneiss piece.I like that countertop.
IMG_7143 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_7151 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_7152 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_7153 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_7154 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_9497 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_9498 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
IMG_9499 by Bos Beeline, on FlickrI swear, this forum is more aesthetically critical than your NIMBYest neighborhood meeting.Ah, a little slice of Waltham in the heart of the city.
We’ll yeah, wouldn’t you expect an architecture forum to be critical of aesthetics?I swear, this forum is more aesthetically critical than your NIMBYest neighborhood meeting.
Buncha fancy boys over here I swear.The building is definitely better-than-average, and close to great when it comes to five-over-one. But it’s a terrible fit for its location. At another location this project would be a clear win, but not here.
We’ll yeah, wouldn’t you expect an architecture forum to be critical of aesthetics?
I don't get what people don't like about the scale of this building. Between the large building in a park and the historic neighborhood riddled with vacant lots the area felt like it was missing something. This building helps repair the streetwall and steps it up to the larger buildings. I like it