Not to defend them, but (1) the study was commissioned and managed by Allston Village Main Streets so the geography, naming, coverage, etc is all dictated by that.
I was at the presentation and brought up the fact that hey, we have a lot of street parking, and it's almost entirely unmanaged -- particularly at peak times. I totally agree with you that adding parking is only going to bring more traffic congestion, and pollution. On the other hand, there are a few lots which aren't going anywhere (e.g. CVS was recently redeveloped in place) and might be good proving grounds for smart parking techniques.
Also keep in mind the audience: AVMS. In particular, Kadish is on the board, and he resolutely believes in the mantra of excessive free parking.
I don't get the gas station thing either. I bet it's because they didn't look outside the boundaries. Although there is only one gas station in the study area, there's a number of them just outside of it. We definitely don't need any more (and I wouldn't mind if the Hess suddenly got redeveloped to fill the gap in the streetwall).
They did mention that those old buildings are warehouses (and what a shame that is!). I think their suggestions are more aimed, again, at the AVMS audience.
A funny thing: at the presentation, someone brought an old pamphlet from a past "plan" which was put together back in 1996, I believe, and promptly forgotten. Same old, same old.
I was at the presentation and brought up the fact that hey, we have a lot of street parking, and it's almost entirely unmanaged -- particularly at peak times. I totally agree with you that adding parking is only going to bring more traffic congestion, and pollution. On the other hand, there are a few lots which aren't going anywhere (e.g. CVS was recently redeveloped in place) and might be good proving grounds for smart parking techniques.
Also keep in mind the audience: AVMS. In particular, Kadish is on the board, and he resolutely believes in the mantra of excessive free parking.
I don't get the gas station thing either. I bet it's because they didn't look outside the boundaries. Although there is only one gas station in the study area, there's a number of them just outside of it. We definitely don't need any more (and I wouldn't mind if the Hess suddenly got redeveloped to fill the gap in the streetwall).
They did mention that those old buildings are warehouses (and what a shame that is!). I think their suggestions are more aimed, again, at the AVMS audience.
A funny thing: at the presentation, someone brought an old pamphlet from a past "plan" which was put together back in 1996, I believe, and promptly forgotten. Same old, same old.