Amazon HQ2 RFP

Status
Not open for further replies.
Saying "it doesn't seem like it'll happen for a while" despite a ton of evidence to the contrary is pretty technophobic IMO. If you had a specific objection - for example that machine vision neural nets are still green technology and might not ever be capable of deciphering complex, contextual road signage - that's a valid point and worthy of discussion. But a ton of people "just have a feeling" that it's going to be a while based on no evidence other than their gut and it leads to bad planning and policy decisions.

Self-driving is happening, and it's happening quickly. Boston can either get on board with it or get passed by.

edit: I'm not railing against you specifically, Coyote.. it's just a general position I've seen a lot of people take that annoys me. Sorry if it came across as a personal attack :).

I highly recommend this book for a thorough discussion on this very topic:
https://www.amazon.com/Our-Robots-O...21497085&sr=1-1&keywords=our+robots+ourselves

Why do we still have pilots in airplanes, even though the technology essentially exists for them to fly themselves (very reliably)?

Seriously, it's worth a read for those who care about this topic.
 
I’ll note the death in Arizona today if for no other reason than the reality that lawyers are going to be on this like white on rice.
 
Not trying to be an ass, but do people want to get on planes not piloted by human beings? i sure don't. i don't care that a fancy machine can do it. i'm sure there's more great uses for robots out there yet to be discovered. But why does this one have to be one of them? Pilots do just fine. Also, it's not like the 200 people in the seats are so desperately poor that they need a robot to fly it.
 
Not trying to be an ass, but do people want to get on planes not piloted by human beings? i sure don't. i don't care that a fancy machine can do it. i'm sure there's more great uses for robots out there yet to be discovered. But why does this one have to be one of them? Pilots do just fine. Also, it's not like the 200 people in the seats are so desperately poor that they need a robot to fly it.

Aren’t most commericial jets all but flown on autopilot already?
 
"MONEY---decides everything"
America is based on a concept of Freedom and rule of law.

When the people in power can just print our money or issue tax breaks for some but not others. (Which is the working class stiff labor & buying power) Then change laws for certain groups that pay taxes and others don't pay taxes.
America concept of Freedom is basically finished. Offer bailouts to some but not others.

Money is freedom in America and the politicians have allowed our money to be swindle by a certain corporate group of elite.

For the parasites that don't get this on the board your either part of this corrupt system destroying the American concept or a complete clueless political hack dependent on this system.

I would rather live under a bridge than allow the American concept to be eroded by a bunch of corrupt lazy people in corporations and a bunch of corrupt politicians. Remember you are also getting your PERSONAL TIME SWINDLED.

Jeezus, did your raging, purple anger at life blind you to the final two words I wrote in the parentheses? "Sadly, sometimes".

Calling people "parasites" only serves to diminish your own humanity. You need a hug. I hope you get help.

In the meantime, here's something to try to brighten your day;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CX6u72thqNA
 
Last edited:
Aren’t most commericial jets all but flown on autopilot already?

Outside of takeoff and landing pilots are mostly there to communicate with ATC and adjust flight parameters on the autopilot (e.g. heading, altitude, airspeed). Even takeoff and landing can be fully automated given the right equipment at the airport, but it's less common unless there's absolutely zero visibility and the pilots need to rely on their instruments.

The time where you really want pilots around is when something abnormal happens like sensors malfunctioning. When something goes wrong it's hard to beat a set of eyes and good pilot training.

Compare that to a car where if something goes wrong "brake and pull over when clear" will safely work 99% of the time.
 
Amazon is Walmart just the online version.


Really? I'd be fascinated to hear about Walmart's version of Alexa, Echo, FireTV, FirePhone, Kindle, Drive, etc.

All I see from Walmart right now regarding futuristic technology is an outsourced strategic partnership with Google for retail based systems.
 
Last edited:
Walmart owns Vudu.com (acquired it in 2010) and is building a cloud which it expects to sell excess capacity on to the public like AWS.
 
Walmart owns Vudu.com (acquired it in 2010) and is building a cloud which it expects to sell excess capacity on to the public like AWS.

That's one.

Seriously, the quote in question read "Amazon is Walmart just the online version."
 
In their defense, Walmart has Walmart Labs in silicon valley, which is their tech and research division and employs > 3,500 employees. Their presence in the bay area and in the open source world is definitely felt. And now, with the acquisition of Jet.com, Walmart is the third largest web retailer in the US. I'm sure the complexity of the inner workings of Walmart's distribution centers matches those of Amazon's. So the comparison is not out of place.

Of course, Walmart is not building its own consumer electronics.
 
"Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, will end up picking Boston."

https://www.forbes.com/sites/peterc...ner-boston-will-win-amazons-hq2/#2a0fae0b712d

Peter Cohan, contributor

$108 billion man, Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, will end up picking Boston -- which in its October 2017 bid touted the region’s top universities, skilled workforce, and possible locations including a 500,000 square foot development at the Suffolk Downs horse track -- for Amazon's second headquarters (HQ2).

How do I know? Of the 20 cities in the semifinals announced January 18, none have the quality of the Boston area's universities. And none of the contenders produce as many talented graduates with skills in engineering, science, mathematics, and business.

To be sure, Amazon -- which is looking to invest $5 billion and create some 50,000 over $100,000 a year jobs wherever it locates HQ2 -- has articulated other criteria for its decision besides talent.

It also wants a "metro area with more than one million people, a stable and business-friendly environment, and [the ability to] think big when it comes to locations and real estate," according to the Wall Street Journal.

There are many of the 20 candidates on the list with less expensive real estate and more room to expand. Columbus, Ohio -- with an average home price per square foot of $124 -- and Indianapolis (average price/sq. foot: $75) -- are among those locations.

But the reality is that for a headquarters location, the key question for Amazon -- and just about any company these days that depends on brainpower to compete -- is where does the best talent come from and where does it want to be.

For such locations -- including Boston (average price/sq. foot: $621), New York ($1,526), and Washington ($539), the real estate market is efficient. Specifically, high real estate prices and traffic-heavy roads are a negative byproduct of attracting the world's best talent.

In my view, the best talent is educated in the Boston area -- but Boston is not able to create enough jobs to keep them all.

For example, a 2016 report from CBRE, which analyzed U.S. tech employment between 2011 and 2016, "found that a significant portion of Boston’s highly-educated tech talent was leaving Boston for greener pastures, finding jobs in places like the San Francisco Bay Area, Washington D.C., and Seattle," according to the Boston Globe.

CBRE reported that Boston's 17,000 technology related degrees over that five year period beat any other top market. But a Boston Redevelopment Authority Study found that workers who voluntarily leave Boston -- some 50% of the total, according to a BCG report mentioned by the BRA study -- often cite "better job opportunities, unaffordable living situations, say they’re in search of a 'better city experience,' or want to return home."

Indeed my conversations with Boston venture capitalists make it clear that New York is considered a highly desirable location for many people educated in Boston (as is Silicon Valley which is not on the list of 20).

My guess is that Amazon will choose Boston because the New York area will be relatively indifferent to its presence whereas Boston will give Amazon more attention -- as it already has for GE -- ($150 million in incentives). As the Boston Globe wrote, "New York doesn’t plan to offer a ton of subsidies and tax breaks; Amazon would be a 'big fish in a big pond,' according to Mayor Bill DeBlasio."

Is Amazon already tipping its hand towards Boston? I don't know -- but it is looking for a million square feet in Boston separately from its HQ2 search, according to the Globe.

Amazon has over "1,000 people in Boston and Cambridge — mostly software engineers and developers — with offices open or under construction in Kendall Square, the Back Bay, and Fort Point. It expects to nearly double that number over the next few years," notes the Globe.

I would bet heavily on Boston to win -- its elite universities, huge pool of technology talent -- much of which has been leaking elsewhere, relatively affordable (compared to New York) real estate, and willingness to offer incentives to attract HQ2 make it hard to beat.
 
Amazon is Walmart just the online version.

Boston does not need Amazon.
Amazon needs Boston/Cambridge Ma---They need our Talent pool to keep them on cutting edge--Technology/Robotics/Drones to deliver their products.

Even if Boston doesn’t want a Walmart retail location in its municipal borders, I don’t think the city would sneeze at having their HQ relocate up here.
 
Last edited:
Amazon is Walmart just the online version.

Boston does not need Amazon.
Amazon needs Boston/Cambridge Ma---They need our Talent pool to keep them on cutting edge--Technology/Robotics/Drones to deliver their products.

LA does not need Amazon, either. This didn't stop Amazon from announcing they are expanding Amazon Studios into a new Culver City location.

What's your point?
 
LA does not need Amazon, either. This didn't stop Amazon from announcing they are expanding Amazon Studios into a new Culver City location.

What's your point?

My point is why is our leaders touting 500Billion dollar company tax incentives to move into Boston or the surrounding areas when Real Estate is already priceless and will continue to drive up the costs on the locals Bostonians if their are any left?

Boston (Surrounding areas) don't need jobs we need investment into TRANSIT INFRASTRUCTURE and Housing that is affordable.

when I'm in the Seaport having dinner or drinking at a bar I'm pretty sure the majority of the restaurant & bar are from other countries or other parts of the state. Most Bostonians can't afford to go out to these places but they keep giving their tax dollars to these billion dollar corporations to swindle their land
 
"Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, will end up picking Boston."

https://www.forbes.com/sites/peterc...ner-boston-will-win-amazons-hq2/#2a0fae0b712d

Peter Cohan, contributor

I certainly hope that's going to happen, and I too was excited to read this piece......until I clicked on the bio :(:

"I ditched corporate America in 1994 and started a management consulting and venture capital firm (http://petercohan.com). I started following stocks in 1981 when I was in grad school at MIT and started analyzing tech stocks as a guest on CNBC in 1998. I became a Forbes contributor in April 2011. My 13th book is "Startup Cities: Why Only a Few Cities Dominate the Global Startup Scene and What the Rest Should Do About It." I also teach business strategy and entrepreneurship at Babson College in Wellesley, Mass. (http://www.babson.edu/Academics/faculty/profiles/Pages/Cohan-Peter.aspx)

The author is a Forbes contributor. The opinions expressed are those of the writer."

Consider the source......was he wearing his Red Sox hat when he wrote it? :)
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top