- Joined
- Jan 7, 2012
- Messages
- 13,982
- Reaction score
- 22,088
I want to pile on and say more nasty things, but.... it is very close to bus and train transpo, across the street from a mall and a lot of the Kendall tech / bio, quick to downtown Boston and easy to get out of the city.
So, what you are saying is that it was given a plum/smart-growth/transportation location that it frittered away with a 6 story landscraper?
Czervik, your post actually makes an even STRONGER case to pile on and say more nasty things about it.
I have to agree with Odurandina's previous post - - this is urban planning malpractice.
It is however something they won't mind knocking down in 30 years to build something better.
I can't imagine any situation where that is the goal for a building.?
I actually can see a developer thinking "disposable building". A lot of suburban houses are built that way, why not an urban landscraper?
Use the cheapest construction technique. Grab the money from the current building cycle. Run away before it falls down. Sounds like a sleazy developer's mantra to me.
Because many years from now, when Cambridge is desperate for buildable land, this may be very viable. Meanwhile they get to make money while sitting on it.
I actually can see a developer thinking "disposable building". A lot of suburban houses are built that way, why not an urban landscraper?
Use the cheapest construction technique. Grab the money from the current building cycle. Run away before it falls down. Sounds like a sleazy developer's mantra to me.
You lost me at "many years from now".
They have 6 sq mi. I was thinking Hong Kong kind of desperate.