In chunks.
Fair enough. It's crowded along that stretch (though healthily crowded the way I see in other major cities with large pedestrian crowds). It is hardly the fault of the pedestrians that the city grew the width of Mass Ave. Community pressure will shrink it down again. That's a standard setback along that stretch.
I disagree with 30', 40' setbacks. I look at the gaping wide hole in front of something like 500 Boylston, and it's pointless to me. This is a dense area. It should be dense. I'm one of the few that likes the siting of the Mandarin though (not the execution, but the siting), so I'm obviously a moron.
The point of this project (as I read the IMPNF and have understood from the few meetings I've attended) is to INCREASE student housing sites per the Mayor's directive. Not centralize. Not ease infrastructure load. Not make it easier for kids with standup basses. Not to manage students. To increase the bed count.
You say it yourself:
Right. I don't know how allowing them to build dorms---but predicating construction upon selling other dorms---gets more students on campus? If you're open to additional height, why not let them build tall enough to house ALL students across the three existing and one new dorm. Problem solved at Berklee!
I tried to respond to the loitering issue politely, but I erased that as it didn't capture the problem properly. Kids acting like jackasses with no regard to other pedestrians isn't an attribute of a healthy city. When you have small children and walk through the area daily, you tend to get defensive of your kids well being, and if I have to navigate 30 kids with dangling cigarettes who aren't paying attention to my short companion, or the inevitable group of 3 or 4 guys jumping on each others back and knocking into other pedestrians, then I lose compassion for my fellow sidewalk users. I have no issue with these activities, rather that they chose the miserable narrow setback to "loiter" in combined with the #1 bus stop and the fact that people are constantly loading/unloading piles of band gear there.
Fair enough. It's crowded along that stretch (though healthily crowded the way I see in other major cities with large pedestrian crowds). It is hardly the fault of the pedestrians that the city grew the width of Mass Ave. Community pressure will shrink it down again. That's a standard setback along that stretch.
The existing facade building is fine, but I would trade it (and the Gehry building) for an additional 8' of sidewalk.
I disagree with 30', 40' setbacks. I look at the gaping wide hole in front of something like 500 Boylston, and it's pointless to me. This is a dense area. It should be dense. I'm one of the few that likes the siting of the Mandarin though (not the execution, but the siting), so I'm obviously a moron.
As far as their Comm Ave dorm, I would be amenable to allowing additional height in the proposed tower in exchange for them selling their "lime/brownstone" dorm. It's not that the students there create any major issues (certainly less than drunk Red Sox fans walking down Comm Ave), but rather I agree with the concept that student housing should be centralized. It is easier to manage (both the students and the infrastructure) and concentrates their socializing separate from the permanent residents. We're talking about a matter of 3 blocks here, not full-on segregation. Finally, if I'm that poor kid that lugged his accoustic stand-up bass back and forth every day, I'd be pretty stoked to live closer to the academic buildings.
The point of this project (as I read the IMPNF and have understood from the few meetings I've attended) is to INCREASE student housing sites per the Mayor's directive. Not centralize. Not ease infrastructure load. Not make it easier for kids with standup basses. Not to manage students. To increase the bed count.
You say it yourself:
....
Really, it comes down to, what exactly is the point of the student dorm tower if not to pull more students on campus?
Right. I don't know how allowing them to build dorms---but predicating construction upon selling other dorms---gets more students on campus? If you're open to additional height, why not let them build tall enough to house ALL students across the three existing and one new dorm. Problem solved at Berklee!