I agree that bells are good ways to alert people. However, in these sorts of conversations it usually goes the way way, where an artificial polarity is drawn where bikers are expected to be totally amiable and forgiving of anything pedestrians do, regardless, or else they’re the angry, hair across his ass screaming biker dude. There is room between these two and there should be a movement—organized and concerted—toward more courteous behavior. That includes bikes but it also includes pedestrians. While it is unrealistic to expect to never encounter a walking soul on a bike path where they should not be walking, there are certain areas where this is a problem and it renders the path itself useless. The stretch I’m referring to by northeastern is an example of that, and while it was predictable that a college campus sidewalk path will be overrun by students, it does beg the question, why is it there at all? And moreover, it IS a leg of the SWC park, and as such, there ought to be etiquette lessons from the university that has benefited from all sorts of city amenities to now creep its way into Roxbury and vomit its students all over the transportation corridor.
As I’ve said on here a million times, there is a culture to Boston that is extraordinarily discourteous that includes walkers, bikers, and cars. That’s something that’s really hard to change but it would be a great target of sustained city public messaging and education. Like, don’t drive like a dick, and respect those around you when you’re biking and walking.
We accept the fact that cars should be able to drive with the expectation that there won’t be random people in the middle of the road. The same should go for bikers. Otherwise all these lanes do NOT function as alternatives to driving, and only serve the purpose of the Sunday driver version of the biker.