Biking in Boston

Same. The Globe is not what it once was. It caters to the burbs readers who think they're progressive but are actually just bourgeois conservatives. Just like Kraft.
Yeah. The Dems have gone full center right and center. The DSA are the closest things we have to an organized center left. And the globe caters to the Dems.
 
I prefer the term “comfortable progressives”. They are progressives until the moment that it might make them less comfortable than they presently are.
I think the fairly well-established term is "liberal hypocrite"... and, of course, and more specific to housing/transit policy, "NIMBY."
 

The article asks a lot of questions it seems like the point was to answer and then never does that. No stats, no data, just repeating the anecdotes heard from people who emailed the author. This is front and center on the Globe's webpage this morning.
Yeah, and the place where the reporter chose to ask for anecdotes was on Next Door, not exactly a bastion of urbanism. Some bike activists saw it and many did send her commentary, but I don't think she used much of it. What bothered me most about the article, though, is the line about demanding data from the city. I don't know whether the city responded, but as a reporter, shouldn't she have been able to do some research and find some data if it wasn't handed to her by somebody else? The data is out there, did she really not know how to find it? What are they teaching at journalism schools?

I find the Globe's coverage of bike or pedestrian issues to be uniformly awful...and this is coming from a paying subscriber...
Me too!
 

Bluebikes are expanding again!

Amazing. BlueBikes are a major success story, I think, for the Boston area. Convenient, cheap, easy to use, gets new people on bikes, and makes it so much easier to get around the city.
 
Amazing. BlueBikes are a major success story, I think, for the Boston area. Convenient, cheap, easy to use, gets new people on bikes, and makes it so much easier to get around the city.
BlueBikes are amazing. I hope to see BlueBikes expand to all cities and towns inside 128 within a few years. Eventually, some communities outside of 128 should probably have them, too (Braintree, Danvers, Framingham, Natick, Needham, Norwood, Reading, Wellesley).
 
Last edited:
Amazing. BlueBikes are a major success story, I think, for the Boston area. Convenient, cheap, easy to use, gets new people on bikes, and makes it so much easier to get around the city.
Love them too. I do wish the newer generation bikes could be a built a (bit) more lightweight, however. I get that it helps with reliability and lifespan but a 45lb bike really deters people who are smaller or have less muscle strength (younger teenagers, smaller women, elderly) from using them (or using them without sweating profusely).
 
This is the last thing we need.

"This is previously discussed work. Flexposts are removed or replaced for a variety reasons, such as damage from vehicles," wrote a spokesperson in an email to StreetsblogMASS on Tuesday evening.

Replaced, sure, absolutely, especially if they're being upgraded to more solid bollards in response to demonstrated safety concerns of people driving their cars through the flex-posts.

Removing protection from the bike lane because cars are hitting the protective element, which we've unfortunately seen before, is knowingly and willfully putting people's safety at risk. And for what? So the doordash driver can pick up Starbucks from the Arlington St location a minute faster?
 
Replaced, sure, absolutely, especially if they're being upgraded to more solid bollards in response to demonstrated safety concerns of people driving their cars through the flex-posts.

Removing protection from the bike lane because cars are hitting the protective element, which we've unfortunately seen before, is knowingly and willfully putting people's safety at risk. And for what? So the doordash driver can pick up Starbucks from the Arlington St location a minute faster?
This removal is quite odd. I'm hoping in the coming few days the city will announce a press release saying they will replace with new/more sturdy barriers by a certain date. It'd be really weird just to leave the lanes unprotected since it doesn't make car throughput any better (since causing traffic is the main argument against bike lanes). The main thing we need to worry about is if this is a intermediate step towards removing the lane entirely.
 
Today’s meeting for the Chestnut Hill Avenue bike lanes was full of NIMBY’s saying that their illegal parking (3’ shoulder) will be taken away and reducing lane width from 15’ to 10’ will cause massive gridlock.
 
This removal is quite odd. I'm hoping in the coming few days the city will announce a press release saying they will replace with new/more sturdy barriers by a certain date. It'd be really weird just to leave the lanes unprotected since it doesn't make car throughput any better (since causing traffic is the main argument against bike lanes). The main thing we need to worry about is if this is a intermediate step towards removing the lane entirely.
Maybe this is just blind optimism, but the information coming directly from the city really did seem to support the idea that flexposts would be replaced with nicer, permanent barriers. Nothing has been explicit (or even implicit IMO) about removing any bike lanes. The aesthetics of old flexposts does genuinely seem to be a key issue here, and I can't say I disagree. Even when they're not hit by cars, they do become discolored and grimy quite quickly. The North Beacon St bike lanes have been in for less than 6 months and the flexposts are in pretty rough shape. Getting these replaced by concrete barriers and/or planters would look a whole lot better.

Regardless of the end result here, it is disappointing that the flexposts are being removed before a replacement is being installed (or even any plan communicated). Leaving the lanes unprotected, even if only for a few days or weeks, puts cyclists at risk. I fully expected BTD and this administration to do better, and hope they do in the future.

For more context, here's the initial Streetsblog article on the Boylston Street bus lane removal, which also included info on bus/bike lane changes (emphasis mine):
Some measures intended as temporary installations with quick-build flexposts and paint to immediately improve safety have been allowed to remain for too long without review or refinement, or resulted in unintended or unaddressed impacts on the local road network. Other areas have become eyesores when plastic flexposts are repeatedly crumpled. At this point in Boston’s evolution of roadway design it is time to review what has been installed over the last fifteen years, adjust or redesign what has not been functioning well, and transition successful temporary safety fixes into permanent, beautiful infrastructure that enhances quality of life and matches the character of our neighborhoods.
 

Back
Top