Equilibria
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 6, 2007
- Messages
- 6,959
- Reaction score
- 8,040
Potential stupid question here, but I honestly don't know:
Where is the money for the many necessary fixes, expansions, and upgrades to the T for the Olympics coming from?
Honestly, it's going to come from user fees and taxes. The indexing of the gas tax that failed is the beginning of that, but it's not the end. Baker has been cool but not cold toward VMT taxing, which at some point will replace the gas tax. AET will ultimately lead to increased tolls on I-90, and I suspect and hope that tolls will go up on other roads over the next twenty years, starting with non-Interstates like Route 2 and Route 24. Some money from those sources will go toward the MBTA. Ultimately, T fares will have to go up as well, and pretty substantially.
Does that have anything to do with the Olympics? No. That has to do with not having this week happen more frequently as deficits get larger, equipment ages, and storms like this become more frequent due to climate change. The Olympics provides a political impetus and puts pressure on people, but it's a three-week event that doesn't have much to do with the actual long-term functionality of the system.
The fact of the matter is that no one, not drivers and not transit riders, has ever paid enough for transportation - that goes back to fare restrictions on private transit companies driving them out of business all the way back in the 1930s. The system is crumbling because of it, and somehow the public has to be shocked into actually altering their mindset instead of simply blaming the "incompetent" agencies.