Re: Boston College Master Plan debut
Whighlander, I agree that Boston-area schools have undergone a dramatic change in their orientation in recent years and have become much more national- and international-facing institutions than they were not too long ago. However, I feel we on the forum often shortchange BC to some degree, and to say that BC is more of a "commuter" school while BU or Northeastern are more nationally focused doesn't match with my understanding of these schools.
To my mind, BC has been more of a national school for a longer time than BU or especially Northeastern. When I was in high school (10 years ago), BC was where very strong students who might also be applying to Georgetown, Dartmouth, Northwestern, etc., went. My friends who were there had roommates from places across the country and world. BU was more of a commuter school for rich kids who weren't necessarily very good students. NU was a commuter school for not-so-rich kids who weren't necessarily very good students (two of my three best friends went there).
Today, BC is #31 in the US News National Universities rankings (right behind UNC-Chapel Hill, tied with Brandeis and ahead of the likes of William & Mary and NYU).
BU is currently #53, right behind Tulane and just ahead of OSU and University of Maryland College Park.
NU is #62, tied with UGA, Southern Methodist University, Syracuse, Worcester Polytech, and Purdue, with UConn, Texas A&M and University of Florida just ahead of it, and Rutgers and Clemson just behind it.
I don't mean to put down any other schools -- especially since I realize BU and NU have, to their credit, improved themselves GREATLY in the past 10 years -- but BC is a much stronger school, particularly at the undergraduate level, than I think many of us on the forum and perhaps in general in the Boston area realize.