Boston Landing | New Balance Complex | Brighton

I can't see how that wouldn't match his goal. That rendering looks like it could have been taken directly from a UC Irvine brochure. It doesn't get more Irvine than that.

Well, outside the camera are the two buildings in the project that will be ~200 feet, so... not eh 280 odurandina wants, but if you swing the camera around, there is some height around.

Also, the residents will have a private courtyard that will have some of the amenities odurandina discusses.

odurandina's argument seemed to be "less buildings, but taller, because this project has no open space". There is open space. Sure, I would have preserved a flat open space, which would be more amenable to a wide variety of uses, but there is a place for office workers to get outside. And unlike in Irvine, CA, it isn't next to a 6 lane road (in fact, odurandina's suggestion seemed to indicate open space should be by the train station, which would result in the undesirable result of being next to the Mass Pike, hardly a peaceful place).

It also is a hell of a lot better than the Sheraton in Boston: https://goo.gl/maps/WN6wdeeVZE22

As for UC Irvine's campus, there is crappy "open space" ( https://goo.gl/maps/k3DhPummfXk ) and much better open space like Aldrich Park ( https://goo.gl/maps/jbVQJ6oQkFJ2 ). Being in Irvine doesn't mean it is junk.
 
The core is actually visibly from some completely unexpected places. I have pics I'll post from the BU Bridge, and I also saw it this morning heading East on Alewife Brook Parkway, past Alewife and towards Fresh Pond. (Alewife on the right) I noticed the crane first but, sure enough, the core is visible between the trees.

Since I'm totally old school, taller projects like this sprouting up around the area really help my ability to navigate without gps. (Assembly is another good example, the big buildings really stand out and give a sense of place that wasn't there before)
 
Is the tower under construction (with the core almost complete) office or residential? I thought it was residential but a few recent posts suggest office. This development needs far more residential along with the long promised hotel and less office space IMO.
 
Nice. Thanks for clearing that up.

As for UC Irvine's campus, there is crappy "open space" ( https://goo.gl/maps/k3DhPummfXk ) and much better open space like Aldrich Park ( https://goo.gl/maps/jbVQJ6oQkFJ2 ). Being in Irvine doesn't mean it is junk.

That is good height for Brighton. No question.

Sorry for the derail i'll just say a few words about irvine's University. They tried to do something different. Schools have quads. UC Irvine's campus has Aldrich Park. The layout of green space is quite impressive (with the schools sections lining the outer wheel with Aldrich Park as the focal point. Overall, it has incredible walkability compared to so many schools not only in So Cal, but everywhere.
Yes, Irvine's University Center area sucks a turd, but there are so many hidden twists and turns on this campus, lots of green patches and 2 or 3 unfinished baseball fields that get dark early because they're closed in. That's kind of cool. i hope they never get developed. The layout throughout is truly bizarre. Takes a bit longer to get your compass because it's a huge circle!... As time goes by, you discover little walking coves and bike paths, with more quirky spaces. Some that could be redesigned. But overall there's a lot of potential thanks mostly the extensive core of eucalyptus, sycamores, desert willows and flowery red coral trees. There's a lot of detail that you don't get on the Google map. It's nice. But, it's California; green spaces tend to be contrived and not well thought out.

There's a worse problem though. It's Irvine.

i should mention UCSD; La Jolla might be the best town in California. But the campus has gone down hill since my attendence in the late '80s. They overbuilt it with 5th College. It's got too many steep grades and odd berms. We had this kind of cool talking forest, but it didn't (or doesn't) engage a passerby to stay and get comfortable. That's where these green spaces in So Cal miss the mark (except for Griffith). The beetles are also huge problem throughout San Diego and Orange Counties. i'm not sure how that's being handled.

Overally, The UCSD campus is just not well planned, quasi-brutalist (Revelle and Muir) and other really bad turds that should go. The campus grew like Microsoft's computer platform. Now they're digging up much the last great open area there was left to put in even more buildings. Ugh.


i just think we're missing something with respect to these big developments. The open space in this project is a bit marginal. But you're right about the noise off the Pike. That may have contributed to the long shoebox. The location has good points. The isolation and size is less good, but i failed to recognize the zero-noise context. Huge upgrade!
 
Last edited:
Thanks Beeline!

That's looking very close to ready!

Any news on the big day?
 
What kind of name is Boston Landing anyway? Why not Brighton or Allston?
 
What kind of name is Boston Landing anyway? Why not Brighton or Allston?

Come on, that is just easy: marketing.

Boston is a much stronger marketing draw in real estate than Brighton or Allston (where?).

Just like the Wynn Boston Harbor Casino. You think he's going to admit it is in Everett on the Mystic River?
 
Come on, that is just easy: marketing.

Boston is a much stronger marketing draw in real estate than Brighton or Allston (where?).

Just like the Wynn Boston Harbor Casino. You think he's going to admit it is in Everett on the Mystic River?

Sure, but this is public transportation. It serves existing neighborhoods. Same deal with the proposed "West Station". WTF is that?
 
Driving by today looked like they were working on the tracks near the platform. Possibly connecting the new inbound track?
 
Sure, but this is public transportation. It serves existing neighborhoods. Same deal with the proposed "West Station". WTF is that?

West Station could be a justified name if the surrounding area is totally rethought development-wise or at least becomes culturally or otherwise significant. A truly outside the box level of rezoning, planning and development would be incredibly successful here... but sadly won't happen. Hearing the casino mentioned, what if in addition to increasing parkland on the river that a portion of riverfront here became sold to commercial interest, bars, apartments, and a water taxi service Allston-Downtown-Wynn Casino? Extreme but ...

*****

Boston Landing is a name I'll always hate.
 
Sure, but this is public transportation. It serves existing neighborhoods. Same deal with the proposed "West Station". WTF is that?

Totally agree with Van on this one. Understand the whole marketing ploy, but this is public transportation, and a station's name should be intuitive and easy to understand.

It make's me think of "Penn's Landing" in Philadelphia (another marketing ploy from the late 80's, early 90's) ... but at least it's on the waterfront and sounds like a historic ship landing.

What would be a better name? Lower Allston? East Watertown? (that's a stretch).
 
West Station could be a justified name if the surrounding area is totally rethought development-wise or at least becomes culturally or otherwise significant. A truly outside the box level of rezoning, planning and development would be incredibly successful here... but sadly won't happen. Hearing the casino mentioned, what if in addition to increasing parkland on the river that a portion of riverfront here became sold to commercial interest, bars, apartments, and a water taxi service Allston-Downtown-Wynn Casino? Extreme but ...

*****

Boston Landing is a name I'll always hate.

West Station is easy. Change it to Beacon Park (for the yard) or once a developer comes in, call it Beacon Yards (like Hudson Yards in NY or Schuylkill Yards in Philly). That way it bears some resemblance to the site/neighborhood, and becomes a "brand", as they say.
 

Back
Top