kennedy
Senior Member
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2007
- Messages
- 2,820
- Reaction score
- 7
I'm referring to the article on p 15, not the video.
Oh, my bad.
I'm referring to the article on p 15, not the video.
Shorter version of article: Vancouver is great because it doesn't impede densification, like Boston, which is an absurd place. Oh, but Vancouver has a homeless problem, which is not related but makes me seem more balanced.
"Didn't most livable used to be our title?" No.
LINKJohn F. Palmieri via the Boston Globe said:?Pokey? pace of Hub development? More like deliberate
March 1, 2010
IN HER Feb. 26 op-ed column ?What?s Vancouver got that we don?t??? Ren?e Loth suggests that Boston?s economy and livability are being held back by a ?pokey?? development process, and that development along Boston?s waterfront is ?stalled?? because of a lack of political will or certainty, or a fear of density.
Nothing could be further from the truth, especially relating to the Greenway Planning Study. The guidelines we have developed will have an impact on this district for generations, and we need to get it right. Citizen input has been critical to the process.
The Boston Redevelopment Authority takes great pains to consider community impacts when development proposals are being vetted; neighborhood issues demand our most serious attention, and often result in better design and implementation.
Pokey? Under Mayor Menino?s leadership, more than 32 million square feet of development (that?s about 30 Prudential towers), including more than 7 million square feet on the South Boston Waterfront, have been approved and are ready to begin construction.
Projects such as Fan Pier and Russia Wharf are already underway, bringing new jobs, density, and public amenities to our waterfront for all Bostonians to enjoy.
The global economic slowdown has affected the pace of development all over the world, not just in Boston.
The mayor and our agency continue to do our part to ensure that when the economy rebounds, there will be no shortage of new density and place-making in Boston.
John F. Palmieri
Director
Boston Redevelopment Authority
I'm afraid the BRA found the hole in her argument and punched right through it. Roth's argument should have been about how the development process is not only slowed down by NIMBYs, but shaped by them, to the extent that the development we get is crap compared to Vancouver.
Well, I just spent 4 days in West Palm Beach and Boca Raton and I can't wait to get back to my BEAUTIFUL city! Besides the weather, I don't understand why people love South Florida; it takes a half-hour to get anywhere by car, it's the land of strip malls and never-ending super roads, and the aesthetics suck.
Exception to the rule.And yet Miami Beach regularly gets lauded here as a good example of town planning and architecture.
CityPlace you are referring to armpit, is considered one of the most successful urban infill projects of it's kind in recent years. It is not all new development, either, including it's centerpiece, the masterful church that was redeveloped into a performing arts center.
It's probably more an irony of timing than anything else, but it always strikes me as silly that in cities with nice climates the typical mode of transport takes you from your McMansion garage, into your car, and right into the shopping center garage - all without breathing fresh air. Meanwhile, in our dense Northeast cities, even the affluent walk miles in the freezing cold and wait in sleet and hail for the bus that never comes...
I'm not referring to City Place, and yes that is one of their only well developed places in West Palm Beach (there's one other that's nice and a lot of rich people live there but I forgot the name of the street and you have to drive 2 miles to get there from City Place). The developments I mentioned on the other page are in Palm Beach Gardens, 10 miles North of City Place. If you ever want to check it out; take 95 North and get off at PGA Blvd and you won't miss the horrible developments.