- May 6, 2007
- Reaction score
Agreed. But from what I've heard, Harbor Point doesn't want one. Reminds me of how Suffolk Downs is completely cut off from the rest of East Boston.I know we've discussed this before, but it's a huge disappointment that there will be no direct street connection with Harbor Point.
It's generally good to complete the street grid. I doubt people would drive between the two with a road connection, but they would walk. Without that connection, walking will require a significant out of the way diversion and much longer distances. It's almost certain that people won't want to do that walk compared to the direct route. It's similar to the suburban sprawl zones where it can be too far to walk from your house to a store that is a mere 50 yards away because there is no direct route. Same concept pops up in the design for Dorchester Bay City.I sincerely can't see what the benefit would be. Harbor Point residents aren't going to drive to Dot Bay City and DBC residents aren't going to need to drive to HP very often. There are a number of pedestrian connections planned. Maybe if HP is redeveloped someday but right now I don't see why you would want to
Welcome to the forum. I assume that the waterfront will stay exactly the same as it is today, which is reflected in the very first picture on the latest link shared in post 287. That sounds like a NIMBY argument (which is reinforced by your user name) that doesn't really hold water in the face of the evidence presented.Also this will ruin the waterfront here, not enhance it.
If development were to be prohibited because of traffic congestion, then all of the Alewife area development, Cambridge Crossing, and many other developments in and around Boston would have been cancelled. At least Dorchester Bay City is near transit, as is Cambridge Crossing and the Alewife area. That's the most important consideration. There will always be automobile congestion, no matter what, so that alone shouldn't stop development. It can be mitigated with expanded transit, bus lanes, etc.
To be fair it's essentially impossible to install bus lanes in a rotary. Alewife is also a complete disaster because they can't feed cars onto Route 2 fast enough. Basically anywhere that 1 traffic light backs up to the next traffic light becomes pandemonium. In this case they really need another outlet onto 93 so all cars going that way don't have to feed into the rotary. But then of course, 93 south of the city is often at a standstill itself.It can be mitigated with expanded transit, bus lanes, etc.
The biggest problem with this is they want to rely on JFK and K circle being rebuilt by state/local agencies while saying hardly a thing about kicking in money. They didnt create the issues but they will exacerbate them greatly. Instead of just saying "its over sized" people should be asking for real concessions from the developer (ie real $$ for improvements, not $5 million)
There's a very nice, moderately used walking path from Carson Beach to the JFK library. It's better than the Castle Island walk IMO, but part of that opinion is based on the skyline view from there being better. Still it's a really nice spot to bring a date for a stroll along the water."Ruining the waterfront" is a joke- nobody uses it as it stands so in theory there's nothing to ruin. Also nothing is changing on the waterfront boardwalk
I'm well aware, I live within walking distance and I walk it- I'd personally call it lightly used unless it's a nice weekend day in the summer.There's a very nice, moderately used walking path from Carson Beach to the JFK library. It's better than the Castle Island walk IMO, but part of that opinion is based on the skyline view from there being better. Still it's a really nice spot to bring a date for a stroll along the water.
Perhaps, but it can certainly grow a lot compared to current numbers. Just as an example, if Boston had Parisian density, there would be 2.5 million people residing within the city limits, rather than 700 thousand. We'd need quite a few more rail lines to support such a population, but we can definitely manage closer to Parisian density along rail lines that already exist.My fear is that the population can't keep growing forever, locally, nationally, and especially worldwide. Resources aren't infinite, and neither is available land. When I was born there were 4.6 billion people in the world, and now we're up to 7.8 billion. I just don't see how any of this is sustainable in the long run, but I likely won't be around to see it play out.