Thanks, Briv. And no one needs to lighten up --
I've a dark sense of humor, and I know it's not for everyone.
With that said, there actually was a subtext to my comment about the questionable design ethos of this proposal. By my assessment, this proposal suffers from a personality disorder. The brick region of the facade looks for all the world
like sad, generic post-WWII public housing that we see across greater Boston. The clapboard-and-mansard (likely to be executed in HardiePlank and asphalt shingles) belongs on a low-budget movie-set.
No less an architect than Frank Gehry gave license to this sort of design psychosis. But Gehry's a brilliant, broad-minded man, and his buildings are jammed with *subtext and social commentary. In the hands of a lesser architect, this approach results in a facade has all the continuity of
an extortion letter.
*Whether or not architecture is an appropriate venue for this sort of discursive expression is a different discussion, and one well worth having -- I'll bring a good bottle of whisky.
They actually do -- there are cold-tolerant varieties indigenous to higher elevations that will survive our winters. I have three of them in my yard.