Re: BRA approves Emerson College's Paramount Center
Generally, Boston has less parking lots than cities comparable, NYC included.
I'd take issue with that. The absolute number of parking lots is probably a lot less, but only because New York is a much bigger city. But in the city's prime, downtown areas, the volume of parking lots (both number of lots as well as the amount of space they take up) is much higher in Boston than New York. I'd say the same about parking garages as well.
The Paramount appears to be a huge success, and that is great. (Incidentally, it also shows the huge good that the political bete noir du jour, universities, can bring to the city's cultural life, architecture, real estate health and overall livability ... but that's another issue.)
Still, the fact that there is a huge empty piece of wasteland across from this, that the typical corrupt city machine politics is what has got us to that situation, or that the city's built environment is fairly tightly controlled by a cabal of unknown, unelected bureaucrats (the BRA) with an apparent blank check and little clear constitutionality to do what they do ... well, it makes you think that we'd do well to look at the bad along with the good, whenever the latter appears.
The fact is that downtown Boston may not be a gigantic parking lot the way downtown LA is (although there's one close by, in the form of the SBW). But we still do have more parking lots, and problems as well as opacity in the political environment for building anything, than New York ... and in terms of density and livability we should be looking to rival Prague, where GDP per capita is significantly lower than in the US, rather than Kansas City.
"Continuous improvement" -- it's the philosophy that brought the Japanese the world's best auto industry ... until they started building cars in San Antonio.