Fenway Center (One Kenmore) | Turnpike Parcel 7, Beacon Street | Fenway

if you are using mozilla, click to open it with private browsing. The article basically just says that Gerding Edlin (of 315 on A in Fort Point) is being recruited to help with the development. Not sure how this relates to what went on with Columbus Center (ie whether or similar partnerships were attempted).

Most recently, delays caused the project to lose financial backing from the pension fund investor Bentall Kennedy, which pulled out earlier this year. Rosenthal, who never developed a major project in the city, has been searching for a new partner for several months.
....
Even with Gerding Edlen’s involvement, Fenway Center would still face many challenges. The partnership must nail down additional investors and financing. ,,,,

Winn had no money to speak of to put into Columbus Center and was dependent on an Irish bank (which pulled out) the state of California Pension fund (which also pulled out) etc. A difficulty in building a large-scale air-rights project is that your initial up-front costs are so high. Winn started constructing the decking only to be forced to abandon it when the partner money dried up.
 
My favorite line from today's Boston Globe:

Rosenthal, who never developed a major project in the city, has been searching for a new partner for several months.
 
Alternatively, and I know this is going to sound crazy, you could pay for the service you're using. It's all of $0.99 a month.

Actually, I signed up fairly recently at 99c/month x 4 months, then it's 4.99/month after that. But it's sooo nice to have the Globe again.

*******

Maybe they can just donate the land here to Steve Samuels.
 
Can you post the text for those of us hitting the Globe paywall + to archive whatever information is in the article on the archboston site?

Many of us hitting the paywall have no idea what you're referring to.

pssstt.....

Every time you clear your browsing history, you get another 5 free articles.......
 
http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/20...gn-turnpike/NVPbQBdhDH1NCMXDPuNnVJ/story.html


By Steve Annear GLOBE STAFF MARCH 31, 2015
The Newton nonprofit that for two decades sponsored the eye-grabbing billboard along the Massachusetts Turnpike that inveighed against gun violence is promising to keep that message fresh in the minds of motorists with a new series of targeted ads.

Beginning Tuesday, Stop Handgun Violence will be “saturating” highway signs at three-dozen locations across the state, an interim solution until cofounder John Rosenthal finalizes construction of the Fenway Center complex over the turnpike.


The new highway signs being installed this week will read, “We’re Not Anti-Gun. We’re Pro-Life. Massachusetts Gun Laws Save Lives,” and feature a Bushmaster XM-15 assault rifle, with a white surrender flag poking out from the barrel.

Billboard space was donated by Clear Channel, Logan Communications, Total Outdoor, and Outfront Media, Rosenthal said. All but four of the signs will be on digital displays.

“It will be huge coverage,” Rosenthal said. “Having billboards all over the state that are literally positioned to have maximum exposure from the highways is a huge win.”


After 19 years, the Newton nonprofit Stop Handgun Violence is looking for a new location for its 252-foot-long billboard.


The campaign comes as Rosenthal bids farewell to the iconic 252-foot-long billboard affixed to the Lansdowne Street parking garage he once owned.

The large billboard was given a March deadline for removal, after Rosenthal sold the garage to the Red Sox’s parent company in 2013. He expects the sign will come down within the next 30 days.

‘That billboard campaign I started . . . is as close to a kid as I have had, and it’s hard letting go.’ --John Rosenthal, Cofounder of Stop Handgun Violence


An estimated 150,000 drivers a day have cruised by that billboard, taking in variations of the message plastered there for 20 years.

“It’s sad. I don’t have kids, and that billboard campaign I started . . . is as close to a kid as I have had, and it’s hard letting go,” Rosenthal said.

To launch the latest campaign, Rosenthal said he called billboard companies across the Commonwealth, who offered their services.

“When we realized he would no longer have his . . . billboard to get out the message about gun control, we offered to utilize some of our space,” said Stephen Ross, president of the Boston division of Clear Channel Outdoor.

“It was easy for us to make a huge impact on such an important message.”

While Stop Handgun Violence, which pushes to reduce gun deaths without banning firearms, has seen considerable support for the latest campaign, some people aren’t too keen on the new signs.

Jim Wallace, executive director of the Gun Owners’ Action League, the state affiliate of the National Rifle Association, laughed at the words and imagery used for the billboard when a reporter described it.

“I don’t know what a white flag has to do with their message,” he said.

Wallace called Rosenthal’s turnpike billboard an “eyesore,” and said it hasn’t amounted to anything in the 20 years since it was installed. He expects the same could be said about Rosenthal’s latest push.

“The billboards are ineffective. I don’t think they have any effect at all, and I don’t think they’ve had any effect on firearm safety in general,” he said.

Rosenthal disagreed.

He said the messages on the turnpike, which in the past included imprints of hands representing the children and teachers killed in Newtown, Conn., in 2012 have helped drive the conversation about gun violence on a national level.

He said when the Fenway Center complex is complete, that conversation will be even more robust, because the building will be constructed over the highway and have more space for permanent signs.

“We are going to come back with a big, permanent billboard that will continue to keep this debate alive for the rest of time,” Rosenthal said. “There’s potential for the billboards to be the first and last thing you see coming in and out of Boston.”
 
Last edited:
Cool. More highway billboards. How progressive.
 
Does that mean this is happening soon?

Quote from 50 weeks ago.

Mayor Martin J. Walsh is proposing to give a $4.6 million tax break to one of Boston’s most ambitious developments, a $550 million project near Fenway Park that could allow him to make his first major imprint on the city’s skyline.
...
But the battle to start construction is not over. Rosenthal said it will take at least a year to finalize construction drawings, get a building permit, and complete financing arrangements with Bentall Kennedy.
...
 
That $82 is about 1/6th 3-5 place on that list so I'd argue its not miniscule.

On one hand its always nice to see Boston is desiresable and in demand but its like dang I'd need a hefty raise to live over there. (Not eye opening) where other cities I could live in very nice neighborhoods easily.
 
That $82 is about 1/6th 3-5 place on that list so I'd argue its not miniscule.

On one hand its always nice to see Boston is desiresable and in demand but its like dang I'd need a hefty raise to live over there. (Not eye opening) where other cities I could live in very nice neighborhoods easily.
Essentially what I was getting at is that stellar's assertion is correct, save for SF that's right up there with us.

I always enjoy House Hunters when it's in like Atlanta or whatever and the couple is looking at 26th fl 1200sf 2brs for like the budget breaking price of $300k.
 
Essentially what I was getting at is that stellar's assertion is correct, save for SF that's right up there with us.

I always enjoy House Hunters when it's in like Atlanta or whatever and the couple is looking at 26th fl 1200sf 2brs for like the budget breaking price of $300k.

Love that as well...so entertaining but depressing at the same time.

Recently visited chicago and was impressed by the relative affordability for a big city...also just visited DC which I was again surprised by how expensive RE is there.

To get back on topic, Fenway has very little transit access outside of the D line...not sure how it will handle all of these new developments.
 
Probably the first time we've ever ranked higher than SF on a "who's more expensive" list. The SF difference is minuscule though - a mere $82.

Makes sense though since SOMA around AT&T park isn't a very exciting neighborhood and to the south of the stadium are a bunch of undeveloped parking lots. I'd rather live in Fenway too.
 
Makes sense though since SOMA around AT&T park isn't a very exciting neighborhood and to the south of the stadium are a bunch of undeveloped parking lots. I'd rather live in Fenway too.

Correct, but that will likely flip when Mission Bay is fully built out. Those parking lots all are slated for luxury development.
 

Back
Top