Fort Point Infill and Small Developments

I don't expect much from a prototypical "conference center hotel". My expectations are for a building in the city of Boston, which shouldn't appear in such a cookie cutter form.

The convention center at least has some design merit, even if it does destroy a lot of urban potential - hence merely "bad".
 
I don't think the convention center is bad at all. considering what was there before, what other convention centers look like, and the imposing view it has from the street, with the overhang. Its not bad at all. It's a convention center, there's no way it's going to have a small footprint or have urban density. Sometime's I feel like people ask for way too much... You gotta be practical.
 
It was practical to build it somewhere else, and not in the way of the street grid.

I mean, it's not as if the reverse-Potemkin Boston of nondescript midrises that is the SBW couldn't have been built anywhere else.
 
?It was practical to build it somewhere else, and not in the way of the street grid.?

If you wanted a competitive-scale convention facility that was in reasonable reach of Boston?s tourist sites, restaurants and the existing hotel infrastructure there were only a couple of places to build a huge structure such as the BEC:

1) probably the best from the location standpoint was the Back Bay next to the Pru and crossing over Huntington to the Mid Town Hotel Property {moving walkways?} or extending from the existing Hynes to the Parking Garage and then Air Rights over the Pike ? neither of these worked well with delivery of exhibits by 18 wheelers
2) Charlestown at the Yard?s End of the Navy Yard ? too far from all the hotels without a major transit and highway construction
3) Southy by extension of the existing World Trade Center to the parking lots ? further from South Station ? but they could have built a Red Line loop
4) Bayside Expo property ? taking over the parking lots and building a big Garage ? also needed a transit link to the Red Line and also too far from the hotels

In the end there was no other place that was as practical and politically palatable as the current BEC site.

That said and given the real success the facility has had {they are seriously talking about expansion} ? industrial the area near the BEC will undoubtedly now get more hotels and so some of them can be signature properties ? with signature architectures?by signature architects

Ultimately, the BEC and now the other developments needs better Transit access than is currently provided by the Silver Line ? first step is grade separated crossing of D Street and then a dedicated and protected ROW to the Ted Williams Tunnel

Westy
 
The Globe said:
New focus for Melcher Street project
Slow housing market leading developer to shift to offices, shops

By Thomas C. Palmer Jr., Globe Staff | February 9, 2008

A Fort Point Channel area redeveloper whose ambitious plans for the neighborhood have been stymied by the crippled housing market is proposing to convert three historic buildings on quaint Melcher Street into offices and retail space.

In the biggest redevelopment phase yet of the portfolio of buildings it bought from the Boston Wharf Co. in 2005, Archon/Goldman is turning its attention from residential properties to the healthier commercial real estate market.

The partnership is set to file plans Monday to redevelop 233,000 square feet at 49, 51, and 63 Melcher St., on the south side of the narrow Fort Point Channel way. The estimated cost is $50 million.

Under the plan, the industrial buildings - some of which became artists lofts - would house offices plus 36,000 square feet of retail shops and restaurants on the ground floors of all four sides of the buildings.

Earlier, Archon/Goldman, which includes Archon Group LP and Goldman Properties Inc., sold what had been planned as its first major neighborhood improvement - a pair of Summer Street buildings slated to be luxury condos. Those former warehouses at 316-322 Summer St. will now be renovated for office use.

"The street-level retail is a key component to this project and a continuation of what's going on in all of the Boston Wharf area," John M. Matteson, regional director of Archon Group LP, said of the Melcher Street plans.

The retail development will be man aged by Goldman, which was active in the development of the Soho neighborhood in New York.

Melcher is a hockey stick-shaped way that connects Summer Street with A Street. The three brick buildings include a nine-floor structure flanked by two five-story buildings. An enclosed bridge on the third floor of one of them crosses to the other side of Melcher.

The developers plan to add one floor to 51 Melcher, the nine-story building, and fill in empty lots at the back of the buildings, near Necco Court, increasing the total usable space from an existing 188,000 square feet.

Melcher Street has been planned as a location for shops and galleries, part of a mixed-use district of businesses, residential buildings, and night-life establishments that would attract residents and visitors to the area at all hours. Architect Joel Bargmann of Bargmann Hendrie + Archetype Inc. of Boston, described adjacent Necco Court as "sort of a dingy, messy court" that would be much improved by the planned redevelopment.

Plans and drawings will not be formally submitted to the Boston Redevelopment Authority until Monday, but the project was considered at this week's Boston Civic Design Commission meeting. It won rave reviews before being unanimously approved.

"It's a very good strategy. It's a very nice project," said commission member David Hacin.

Ed Tsoi, chairman of the commission, commended the developer for its "care and finesse. . . . What it's doing to bring life back into the Seaport district is extremely valuable," Tsoi said.

In a recent letter of intent to the city, the developer said it wanted to repair the historic facades of the brick buildings and add new windows and roofs.

Justin Krebs, a principal at Normandy Real Estate Partners, welcomed the proposal. He said his company has been concentrating on redeveloping the Summer Street side of two buildings it purchased from Archon/Goldman last year.

"Part of what Archon's proposing will help lead us on the other side of Melcher Street," said Krebs. "The whole game plan they thought of, creating a retail corridor, makes some sense there."

Thomas C. Palmer Jr. can be reached at tpalmer@globe.com.
Link
 
I'm glad they are going to some use. I'd hate to see a block of empty condos where you could have very nice offices. Shame they kicked all the artists out for this, though.
 
^ yeah, too bad about the artists. There was a crew of couriers that lived in 51 who would throw humongous parties every Friday after work, and it baffled me that that space -- roughly three blocks from South Station -- had stayed the way it had for so long (from what I saw it was a shithole).

One more anomaly safely wiped clean.
 
I'm not sure what's going on here, whether it's going to be residential or office and the only address I can see is 215 A St. I skimmed this thread and couldn't find anything on it. Work started about a month ago by the Aulson Company and Gilbane has a field office set up, but couldn't find anything on either of their websites. It's right across from the Gillette building.

Four buildings that look like three but the middle one is two identical ones. They date, from this view - 1922, 1915, 1916 and 1919.
sb026sx0.jpg

sb024nj9.jpg

sb032jl3.jpg


A couple of quick ones of the FP3 progress -
sb035rb0.jpg

sb036cv8.jpg
 
FP3's facade looks rather nice. I always forget to check out how that project's doing..
 
I still don't know how I feel about the top floor being angled. I've seen it on other buildings and think it looks silly. It reduces space and doesn't look proper inside (considering what they do to line up the plumbing and electrical wiring to the rest of the building).
 
City balks at Fort Point office plans
Residents lobby for more housing
By Scott Van Voorhis
Wednesday, March 26, 2008


City Hall is putting the brakes on a sudden surge of office development in Fort Point Channel, long touted as an up-and-coming residential neighborhood.

The Boston Redevelopment Authority is delaying a decision on a pair of proposed Fort Point office projects - at 316-322 Summer St. and at 49-53 Melcher St. - after protests from the area?s growing residential enclave. The BRA had planned to approve both projects April 1.

Instead, John Palmieri, the BRA?s new director, said the authority decided to ?take a breather? after a meeting with representatives from several Fort Point neighborhood organizations.

The groups argued City Hall?s long-term plan to transform the industrial enclave into a vibrant residential neighborhood is under threat as developers scrap condo plans in favor of office projects.

Instead, the city authority will take the next 30 days to study concerns raised by Fort Point residents and explore ways - including tapping into city affordable housing money - to encourage more residential development.

?To the extent that we can at least lead with some residential, it would provide some comfort to those people who have made the neighborhood their home and believe in creating a bona fide, mixed-use neighborhood,? Palmieri said.

The decision got a mixed reaction from the developers of the two projects in question.

?I don?t think there is a developer in the Northeast that would make that building residential right now,? said John Miller, regional chief for Lincoln Property, of plans to renovate and expand 316-322 Summer St. into 133,000 square feet of office space. Previously it had been slated for 87 condos.

In a statement, a spokeswoman for developer Archon/Goldman, which plans to expand and renovate the Melcher Street building into 188,000 square feet of office space, cited $2 million in contributions made to neighborhood causes.


Link
 
How about instead of 87 luxury condos, they do 120 (or whatever) loft style apartments? Those would still sell/rent no matter what. That's the kind of housing needed in the city now.
 
Boston Globe - March 26
City is focused on Fort Point area
Public fund may be used to encourage homes for artists


By Thomas C. Palmer Jr., Globe Staff | March 26, 2008

Distressed that an ailing housing market is undermining development of a vibrant mixed-use community of residences and businesses in the Fort Point Channel neighborhood, Boston officials yesterday vowed to try to do something about it - possibly even putting money into residential projects.

The city might use money from its affordable housing fund - contributed to by past developers - to encourage construction of housing that would accommodate resident artists, according to Boston Redevelopment Authority director John Palmieri.

Palmieri met with a group of concerned residents and artists from the area last week about the lack of housing. "They made some very strong points, to put it mildly," he said.

"We're in agreement," said Palmieri. Mayor Thomas M. Menino, he said, "clearly believes residential development is critical to the redevelopment of that district. It's in the plan."

City officials and residents of the area are faced with a strong commercial market that could leave the Summer Street corridor dominated by office and retail uses, shutting out families, and in particular artists who used to live in the neighborhood.

Among the projects in the area fueling this concern are two brick-and-beam warehouse buildings at 316-322 Summer St. that the Archon Goldman development team sold to Lincoln Property Co. last year after the residential condo market softened.

Goldman has previously discussed turning the buildings into luxury condos with flashy retail or restaurants on the ground floors. Now, Lincoln Property plans to rehabilitate the empty structures into offices, because the demand for commercial space had grown as the residential market has declined, and commercial rents, even for older buildings, are higher than they have been in years.

Neither developer could be reached for comment yesterday.

Meanwhile, Archon Goldman is proceeding with plans to redevelop three buildings on Melcher Street into office and commercial space, in a project that recently won strong support from community representatives who spoke at a public meeting.

But BRA spokeswoman Susan Elsbree said community representatives have also loudly voiced concerns, in public comments submitted during city reviews, about over-commercialization of the district and their fears that new housing will not materialize for years.

Elsbree said the city's and community's overall vision for the area is that it be developed as one-third residential, one-third commercial, and one-third open space.

BRA officials also took the unusual step of extending the public comment periods on these two sets of commercial projects by two weeks each, to allow residents and others more time to voice their input. Deadlines on the two were set to expire today and tomorrow.

During the two-week extension of the public comment period, Elsbree said, "We will take the opportunity to look at the planning and policy issues in the Fort Point Channel area that are happening because of market conditions."

Also, BRA officials said they would meet with developers to discuss how to create the mix of properties that owners and the city identified as a goal for the neighborhood after the Boston Wharf Co. sold off its portfolio of warehouse and industrial buildings there.

Palmieri said the city understands that market forces affect developers' plans. But, he said, "We accept the burden here of really redoubling our efforts to find out what we can to do impress on property owners, possibly with some assistance, the need to create a bona fide mixed-use community."

Elsbree indicated the city housing funds, if tapped, would be used for particular types of housing in Fort Point.

"We'll look at those to show that we want to make this work," she said, "with a goal of creating more artist live-work space, and creating more housing in the Fort Point Channel."

Thomas C. Palmer Jr. can be reached at tpalmer@globe.com.
 
I'm not sure what's going on here,...the only address I can see is 215 A St...and couldn't find anything on it.

That's because they're using the addresses on the other side of the building, you idiot. 10, 20, and 30 Channel Center.

Commencing in the winter of 2007, construction will begin to renovate approximately 250,000 SF of vacant warehouse space into commercial use in 10, 20 & 30 Channel Center. The project will include restoring the buildings' facade, renovating the interior, and further improving the landscaping to bring the previously approved plans to fruition. The restored buildings will respect the architectural history of the neighborhood and at the same time offer all of the modern amenities.

It is anticipated that that tenants will occupy the rehabilitated space in the Fall of 2008.
http://channelcenterupdate.gilbanetech.com/Home/tabid/68/Default.aspx

December 12, 2007

Channel Center Holdings VAF, LLC Announces Start of Construction
Renovation work to focus on 248,000 square-foot commercial project; Space to be delivered to market by Fall of 2008

BOSTON ? Channel Center Holdings VAF, LLC, a joint venture of an affiliate of Commonwealth Ventures, LLC, and GEAM Value Add Realty Partners, as advised by GE Asset Management, announced the commencement of construction work on the commercial office space portion of the Channel Center Project, a mixed-use development consisting of 1.1 million square feet of office, residential, commercial and retail developable space in the Seaport District of Boston. Gilbane Building Company has been selected to lead the renovation work.

The Channel Center property consists of three components, including land and historic brick buildings located along A Street. The total remaining development potential, including expansion, consists of 293,000 square feet of commercial and first floor retail construction at 10-40 Channel Center; 620,000 square feet of new office building product; and 207,000 square feet of residential development, including both renovated space and new construction.

Interior demolition work began December 10th on the 248,000 square-feet of existing space in the 10, 20 and 30 Channel Center. The buildings are scheduled to be ready for tenants to begin interior construction as early as Summer 2008.

?We are pleased to move forward with the construction on this portion of the Channel Center project,? said Richard Galvin, President of Commonwealth Ventures, LLC. ?We look forward to delivering first-class, competitively priced office and retail space.?

?The Channel Center project is an exciting one for Gilbane, and we are delighted to continue our successful relationship with Commonwealth Ventures,? added Ryan Hutchins of Gilbane Building Company. ?We are excited to be a part of the continued redevelopment of the Fort Point Channel District.?

CB Richard Ellis will lead the office leasing component of the project, utilizing the team of William J. Crean, Jr., Ogden White and Jonathan Freni.

?We are eager to deliver fully renovated brick and beam space in Boston?s most exciting and fastest growing mixed use neighborhood,? said Bill Crean, Senior Vice President/Partner at CB Richard Ellis.
http://www.gilbanebuilding.com/regions/reg_news_detail.aspx?key=498&RegionID=2

------------
ADD Inc. is ADD-ing another floor. [/lame]



------------

FP3
fp3002jc6.jpg

fp3003ce5.jpg

fp3004jg2.jpg

fp3007sa9.jpg
 
Is that turquoise colored stone or some kind of pre-aged copper panels on FP3?

Whatever it is, it looks great.
 
Banker & Tradesman - April 14, 2008
Lincoln Property Offers Artist Space, Not Housing, In Ft. Point Neighborhood
By Thomas Grillo
Reporter

320SummerStrendering.jpg

Lincoln Property Co. is negotiating with an artist group
to provide low-cost space at 316-322 Summer St. in
Boston?s Fort Point Channel neighborhood.


A developer criticized for not providing housing in Boston?s Fort Point Channel neighborhood is offering artists space instead.

Lincoln Property Co. is negotiating with Studio Soto, a gallery/workspace for artists, to take 3,500 square feet at their Summer Street property.

John Cappellano, Lincoln?s senior vice president, said the group would occupy space on the lower level for $1 per square foot annually. Lincoln would also provide artists with $50,000 toward renovation of the space.

?We hope the community will be receptive to the idea,? said Cappellano.

Valerie Burns, a longtime Fort Point resident, said she supports space for Studio Soto, but it will not solve the district?s need for more housing.

?It would be great to have Studio Soto here, they?ve been a part of the arts community for many years,? she said. ?But providing gallery space fails to live up to the city?s promise to create more housing in our neighborhood.?

Lincoln is seeking Boston Redevelopment Authority approval to convert a pair of warehouses at 316-322 Summer St. into 140,000 square feet of office space with ground-floor retail and a rooftop addition. But neighbors protested that the BRA has abandoned the city?s vision of a Fort Point district that would include a mixed-use neighborhood anchored by open space and 6 million square feet of development, with at least one-third as housing.

In response to the public outcry, Mayor Thomas M. Menino and BRA Director John F. Palmieri asked Lincoln to reconsider their proposal and add housing.

Palmieri declined comment. In an e-mailed statement, the BRA said they are working with Lincoln on the project.

Jed Speare, Studio Soto?s director, also declined to be interviewed. Studio Soto is located on Melcher Street in the Fort Point neighborhood, but was not offered the opportunity to renew their lease with landlord Archon-Goldman, according to the group?s Web site.

A statement posted Monday by Speare on the site said they were close to an agreement on a five-year lease in the Summer Street space. ?This will be extremely good news for Studio Soto, its audiences and supporters, and the Fort Point community,? the statement said.
 
People have been in and out of these buildings for the past week and they even had the sidewalk taped off yesterday for some reason. With the exception of one guy holding a broom for three days straight I haven't seen anything being done, I think they're just checking it out and possibly doing some very minor prep work.

They set up a large temporary heater for these last year and pumped hot air in all winter, despite the buildings being empty. Could never figure that out.
 
Well since I seem to have nothing better to do but post entries on this forum, I wanna pass on something interesting. I cannot vouch for its accuracy.

The last couple of buildings on Summer Street, around 327-337, are owned by Goldman Properties.

If you walk by 327, you always see one guy sitting at the front desk, reading a newspaper.

He's actually a Boston firefighter.

Goldman had a choice - put sprinklers in that building or pay for a 24-hour a day fire watchman.

They went with the fire watchman.
 

Back
Top