odurandina
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2015
- Messages
- 5,328
- Reaction score
- 265
too bad they didn't sweep away the squat brutalist monstrosity (next to 1 Dalton)
to go with the original site prep.
Man its beautiful to know no nimby can stop this now. Its coming and theres nothing anyone can do about it. Every floor is a growing middle finger to the opposition. Also just watching them pour this in place is a good watch knowing whats to come. We waited with this hole in the ground with what felt like forever and now its already shooting out of the ground. Bout time.
I don't know what you're talking about because there were barely any NIMBY opposition for this project. If you're going to lay blame, lay it in the correct spot.
too bad they didn't sweep away the squat brutalist monstrosity (next to 1 Dalton)
to go with the original site prep.
Man its beautiful to know no nimby can stop this now. Its coming and theres nothing anyone can do about it. Every floor is a growing middle finger to the opposition. Also just watching them pour this in place is a good watch knowing whats to come. We waited with this hole in the ground with what felt like forever and now its already shooting out of the ground. Bout time.
As I said before, the site was NIIMBY proof. Shadows fall on church property, so if they don't have a problem with it that doesn't work. Plus it looks bad to try to extort a church for public amenities. Not to mention politicians who are usually at the beck and call of NIMBY groups are more reluctant to play hardball with a religion.
Given all that, press hungry citizen groups slinked away even though they oppose everything taller than a tree.
Man its beautiful to know no nimby can stop this now. Its coming and theres nothing anyone can do about it. Every floor is a growing middle finger to the opposition. Also just watching them pour this in place is a good watch knowing whats to come. We waited with this hole in the ground with what felt like forever and now its already shooting out of the ground. Bout time.
I have to really disagree with that sentiment. The Christian Science Plaza, and the three brutalist structures framing it, are one of the best examples of quality brutalist execution in the country. They create some amazing framing for the original Christian Science Mother Church. That is actually one of my favorite spaces in the city.
There was no NIMBY opposition because they had no plausible way to stop the project. As I said before, the site was NIIMBY proof. Shadows fall on church property, so if they don't have a problem with it that doesn't work. Plus it looks bad to try to extort a church for public amenities. Not to mention politicians who are usually at the beck and call of NIMBY groups are more reluctant to play hardball with a religion. Given all that, press hungry citizen groups slinked away even though they oppose everything taller than a tree.
I was basing it more towards the fact that people dont know this is coming and theyre going to shit their pants when they see this pass the pru. My dad works on almost every new project in boston and he didnt know what the crane is for here. People are going to be shocked. I hardly ever talk about nimbys but people are in for a surprise when this thing keeps going.
Its coming and theres nothing anyone can do about it.
So you're telling me that NIMBYs are basically normal people who will only oppose if they have reasonable beef (for the most part in regards to this project) with the development.
Why even bring up NIMBYs if they didn't oppose this project then? Jesus Christ you guys are obsessed. Do you guys also blame NIMBYs when your car keys go missing?
No, I'm saying generally NIMBY's are scummy morons who sue projects to make up for a lack of companionship in their lives to get their names in the paper. This is aided of course by the lazy and talentless reporters of the Globe, who will frame every story as brave citizens standing up against blah blah blah.
However, NIMBY's have been playing the game for years and they know how it works.
So, the "faceless developers angle". Doesn't work against the Christian Scientists. Also that church is part of the fabric of the city as its their headquarters. Its not like suing the Moonies.
Getting free and favorable press from the Globe? Not going to happen in this case for the same reasons. Grandstanding politicians? Far easier villains to grandstand against.
So, faced with all this, what did NIMBY's do? Why, they kept quiet of course, instead of standing on their alleged principles. I'm sure this thing going up is killing squirrely Shirley K and the rest of the trolls, but they know how to pick and choose their battles. Its kinda like how they rarely went to the mat against a project Menino really wanted, or ignored the blatant violation that is the IMAX theatre even though by right that project should STILL be litigation.
NIMBY's are not normal people. They have no principles. But, they realize when opposition to a project will deny them the one thing they crave the most - positive press. Hence, why this project has sailed through despite being the tallest building constructed since the early 70's.
Clearly you have never heard of the Waterview Tower in Chicago. This was a supertall that was put on hold after about 30 stories were poured, and then was eventually finished at about 60% of its original height, with a different design to boot.
If the economy falls off a cliff tomorrow and investors start pulling out, then we don't have this tower. I'm not ready to exhale just yet. You should know by now not to be overconfident when it comes to big towers in Boston. It's not a sure thing until it's DONE.
Why even bring up NIMBYs if they didn't oppose this project then? Jesus Christ you guys are obsessed.
DZH22; said:Clearly you have never heard of the Waterview Tower in Chicago. This was a supertall that was put on hold after about 30 stories were poured, and then was eventually finished at about 60% of its original height, with a different design to boot.
To be clear, NIMBYs aren't only anti-height. We need some moderate resistance to get better designs and public investment from developers, otherwise we'd have a lifeless, cold, boring Boston. 1 Bromfield was a mess at ground level in the original design.
A little back on track with 1 Dalton: can't wait to see this shoot up. Such a simple but elegant design...perfect for Boston
A few of them probably have the public's best interests at heart. Unfortunately for the vast majority its all about power and has nothing to do with what's good for the city. The problem is any time a project is needlessly delayed 10 years in order to chop 5 stories off of the original proposal, the city is pissing away all that potential tax revenue. Now add that up amongst a dozen projects and how much money is lost? Hundreds of millions? Maybe more? That opportunity cost analysis is what tends to get lost in all of this - money that could be used on anything from parks to police to schools to transportation.