This is how you perpetuate a housing crisis.I don't. Cities are more than just buildings. The new one will host youth summer camp programs too for the community outside of Wentworth. Way better than the huge surface parking lot there currently.
This is how you perpetuate a housing crisis.I don't. Cities are more than just buildings. The new one will host youth summer camp programs too for the community outside of Wentworth. Way better than the huge surface parking lot there currently.
It's really not. I wish you could have a nuanced take instead of constant hyperbole.This is how you perpetuate a housing crisis.
Wentworth doesn't need a 2.5 acre athletic field and Boston doesn't need another sports stadium in a transit desert.It's really not. I wish you could have a nuanced take instead of constant hyperbole.
in a transit desert.
And the youth programs are a perfect example of why we want such facilities to be transit adjacent. What's better for teenagers? The field at English School, a block from a T station? Or the field at West Roxbury Educational Complex, sort of near one low frequency bus line?I don't. Cities are more than just buildings. The new one will host youth summer camp programs too for the community outside of Wentworth. Way better than the huge surface parking lot there currently.
Or the consultant is very much aware of this but is showing existing transit in the most positive light possible to counter act people saying this is a 'transit desert', which is much much less accurate than showing an extra bus number on a route that has buses running on it full time.One big issue in that report is that the consultant who wrote it doesn't understand about the BPS special routes. They show several buses passing through Franklin Park that do so only once a day in each direction, transporting students to Latin Academy. Those buses will not be useful for White Stadium events.
I doubt it, because this one would be much too small. The Revs want a 25,000 seat stadium, while White Stadium only holds about 11,000. White Stadium is quite a bit smaller than the current smallest MLS stadium, which hold 18,000 in San Jose. Maybe someone floats the idea that the Revs could play here, but I doubt that would be a serious proposal.she might envision the Revs playing at White Stadium?
Absolutely, this is a useful comparison. White is a much smaller transit challenge because the pedestrian environment is already far better and White will be less than half the people of a Revs stadium. But they're both similarly far from the Orange line and have some bus connectivity. Also, White already has a detailed plan for how to handle game day traffic (in section 5.6). It involves a fleet of shuttle busses running to/from the remote parking lots, the Orange Line, and Commuter Rail. This isn't my field, but it looks like a reasonable plan. I couldn't say how easily it scales up for a stadium more than twice its size.As mentioned in the Revs Stadium thread, both sites have their own Transit challenges.
I’ll admit that this would be a good short term plan for Everett. Reasonable and cost-effective solution. I’ll give her that.White already has a detailed plan for how to handle game day traffic (in section 5.6). It involves a fleet of shuttle busses running to/from the remote parking lots, the Orange Line, and Commuter Rail. This isn't my field, but it looks like a reasonable plan. I couldn't say how easily it scales up for a stadium more than twice its size.
It might come to this where Kraft abandons Everett and strikes a deal with Wu (highly unlikely).Help me to understand this...
If The Revolution, as well as a women's team, both want stadiums, why not build one and let both of them use it?
I get that the women aren't the same draw as the men, but there are ways of dealing with that. It seems like an awful waste of space to have TWO pro soccer stadiums when one would be sufficient.
But White Stadium already exists. It can never be satisfactory for the Revolution, but can certainly be a great fit for a women's pro team. This is a sensible way to upgrade some public infrastructure and avoid stigmatizing the women as somehow less deserving of an appropriate venue than the men. I'd be more inclined to agree with your point if the proposal was building two brand new stadiums, but this is not that.Help me to understand this...
If The Revolution, as well as a women's team, both want stadiums, why not build one and let both of them use it?
I get that the women aren't the same draw as the men, but there are ways of dealing with that. It seems like an awful waste of space to have TWO pro soccer stadiums when one would be sufficient.
What @HenryAlan said.Help me to understand this...
If The Revolution, as well as a women's team, both want stadiums, why not build one and let both of them use it?
I get that the women aren't the same draw as the men, but there are ways of dealing with that. It seems like an awful waste of space to have TWO pro soccer stadiums when one would be sufficient.