stellarfun
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2006
- Messages
- 5,686
- Reaction score
- 1,502
Call John Fish. I believe I see his company's name on the fencing.
Beton, what you see as ripples in the panels as poor materials or workmanship, or both, I see as part of the design. Granted, I said if you look closely enough you'll see flaws, but in this case, looking closely at the ripples indicates, to me anyway, that the ripples are not flaws at all but a deliberate decorative design of the panel. I might be wrong, I'm certainly not an expert in construction, but it's just how I see it.
The ripples do seem to be the design intent but appear to me to be extremely poorly executed/installed. Can't imagine this would pass BPDA inspection, is the VMU on site?
I suppose the chunky I-beam aesthetic of the facade references Miesian Modernism. But if Mies is Led Zeppelin, then this project is a shitty wedding band hacking through side three of Physical Graffiti.
Yes, the end result of intentional poor design and unintentional poor design are the same. What may have been good intentions to incorporate some texture has yielded a result that looks like very poorly fitted panels.
We disagree on several things, but no argument from me about this!
From the photos the panels appear to be "oil canning." This happens when metal panels are hard-fastened to their structure (slotted or flexible attachment is typically preferred). When the sun hits them the material expands and with nowhere to go they deform like that.
I'm not the cladding expert here (cca is), but that just looks like a ribbed panel to me. Seems intentional.
^ Assuming that the BPDA signs off on this, would you care to hazard a guess on how long it'll be before the owners have to pony-up to reclad at least some of the facade?
Beton, what you see as ripples in the panels as poor materials or workmanship, or both, I see as part of the design
I'm not the cladding expert here (cca is), but that just looks like a ribbed panel to me. Seems intentional.
I think you two are looking at something different from the rest of us. Yes, the panels are intentionally "ribbed," but if you look more closely you can see "flattening" or distortions along the panels as well.
See the second floor shown in this image:
Looks almost like bad image compression artifacts to me, but I haven't seen anything like this in Beeline's other photos.
Right; the give-away is the shadow cast onto these vertical panels by the horizontal band above. Some of the panels bow in so the shadow swoops down, some bow out, so the shadow swoops up.
I would say that something just aint quite right here.
cca