yea, the removal of the site webcams was a clear sign that there was going to be no transparency when it came to this project.
Oh boy, imagine every last hole filled and properly landscape, construction fence packed up, every tool is gone, even the plastic wrapping peeled off. No sign of construction left, 100% complete no matter what angle you look at it - not even adjacent construction and final detailing like at Union or Lechmere. Just nice stations except the gates just need to be rolled up to look open.
Then November comes and leaves. The December comes and nothing happens. And just like the first 2 weeks Orange Line post-shutdown nobody knows what's going on, the media start asking questions 2 weeks into December. Only into the 3rd week in December will they announce they aren't opening but with no explanation why or when. They only start giving explanations only about the explanations to citing lack of responses due to Christmas and New Years - but still no explanation why or when delay itself. And then only after that outrage get a more substantial explanations is given after that with an express of regret again for the lack of communication
I can imagine the timeline going even darker but I think I'm going bleak enough in this pure unfounded speculation.
Nono, I fully believe it will open this year - at least on "revenue service" train will run before Baker leaves office to prove he was able to get tough and fix at least the GLX. It might shutdown after that for months to fix overhead catenary that forces the line to 5 mph, but, hey, w/e who's keeping track and the photo ops are done and people are out of office by then.
They need to do full trial running, which should involve switching the D branch to terminating at Union Square and having the E branch kick off it's passengers at Lechmere and run out of service to Medford. They'll need a few weeks of that if the Union launch is any indication.How much more train testing and crew qualifications do they need to do? Is it possible they already mostly got that done before the Orange Line shutdown?
The D has been running to Union square lately, and during the shutdowns the C is running to Union SquareThey need to do full trial running, which should involve switching the D branch to terminating at Union Square and having the E branch kick off it's passengers at Lechmere and run out of service to Medford. They'll need a few weeks of that if the Union launch is any indication.
I admittedly haven't been out that way in a few weeks, I've been seeing E branch trains head signed as Union Square still but it's entirely possible they've already made the branch switchover then and haven't fixed the headsigns...The D has been running to Union square lately, and during the shutdowns the C is running to Union Square
i Just can’t get my head around building a flawed amenity, knowing full well it’s flawed. I think from wallnut to CX it might work ok because no one will use it for recreation but I think walnut to the existing path will actually be dangerous. I’ll prob stick to bone shaking highland.I'm not usually a ray of sunshine type, but -- and, bear in mind, I absolutely get your and others' criticisms of this -- as a bicyclist who lives nearby I will be using this the minute it's open and have zero worries. It won't be "unusuable." I'd rather have a flawed amenity than no amenity. This path will be great.
So we are running Charlie out to Swampscott with tar and feathers when this happens right?Nono, I fully believe it will open this year - at least on "revenue service" train will run before Baker leaves office to prove he was able to get tough and fix at least the GLX. It might shutdown after that for months to fix overhead catenary that forces the line to 5 mph, but, hey, w/e who's keeping track and the photo ops are done and people are out of office by then.
That bridge over the Red Bridge is going to be a photo spot. Not sure that it will be super heavily used as a commuter route in the way that people seem to assume that it will be.i Just can’t get my head around building a flawed amenity, knowing full well it’s flawed. I think from wallnut to CX it might work ok because no one will use it for recreation but I think walnut to the existing path will actually be dangerous. I’ll prob stick to bone shaking highland.
It's one way of ensuring that over-eager/earbud-distracted/etc. bicyclists don't just plow right through dangerously busy car-heavy intersections.i Just can’t get my head around building a flawed amenity, knowing full well it’s flawed. I think from wallnut to CX it might work ok because no one will use it for recreation but I think walnut to the existing path will actually be dangerous. I’ll prob stick to bone shaking highland.
So we are running Charlie out to Swampscott with tar and feathers when this happens right?
It's one way of ensuring that over-eager/earbud-distracted/etc. bicyclists don't just plow right through dangerously busy car-heavy intersections.