F-Line to Dudley
Senior Member
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2010
- Messages
- 9,262
- Reaction score
- 9,278
You completely lost me with this track. When the density of the corridor screams with such beat-you-over-the-head superlatives and has been underserved for those demographics for so many generations...that's not a "too much privilege" argument at all. It's a "BUILT THE @#$% TRANSIT" argument. The outflow consequences for the housing market then become a "APPLY SYSTEMIC TREATMENTS TO HOUSING INEQUALITY" call to arms, not an excuse to scapegoat the transit for existing.I mean its telling where the citys priorities are when somerville gets glx when the area already has red and orange not far away and the indigo line dmu plan to the "poorer" neighborhoods gets scrapped.
Your second point about poorer neighborhoods getting the shaft is fully accurate in thrust. But then it lifts the Patrick-era "the indigo line DMU plan" to unwittingly slew-foot it, to kind of miss the ultimate point. Like...the "Indigo"-branded Patrick/Davey plan was complete and total BS. It aimed to spend a quarter-billion dollars buying shiny self-propelled things (which aren't half as good as actual Regional Rail electrified EMU best-practice)...which (per immediate news leaks about Boston 2024 and vehicle maint facilities in Foxboro) they then sought to ACTIVELY UNDERCUT service levels on the Fairmount corridor by vulturing the shiny toys to the 'burbs and to the useless Track 61 dinky instead of fulfilling the "It's the frequencies, stupid!" essence of the Fairmount Improvements recs (and legal obligations therein). If anyone questioned that, the one-trick retort to an obvious fraud heist would've been: "Well, we bought you shiny new vehicles. Why aren't you ingrates happy with that?!?" We were conditioned to believe the shiny vehicles were the service...and not, you know, the actual frequencies and fare equity being the service. Patrick's cronies put on a masterclass in Lying With Title VI with their Fairmount corridor rope-a-dope. They wanted people to cite "the Indigo DMU thing" for shade-throwing purposes, for the vehicle purchase to be the sole cultural currency the corridor had so they could proceed at stripping back the service levels interference-free. They wildly succeeded at being able to undermine justice communities if they convinced people to only talk about their choice of vehicle-make vanity and not the complete de-emphasis on achieving the service levels that netted economic justice for the corridor in question.
Plying Title VI for argumentative fallacies is not a new craft for Greater Boston political elites. Powerful people have been playing us like a fiddle with this kind of noxious framing for generations. It's a somewhat hopeful moment that "SO FIX HOUSING, FOR @#$% SAKE!" is the more immediate take to this batch of GLX equality reporting than "uh-oh...'privilege' strikes and we should feel shame." And somewhat hopeful that we're fighting tooth-and-nail for the Rail Vision frequency specs on the Fairmount corridor instead of getting distracted by transparently chum in the water over 'the vehicle IS the service' again. These framing BS games are pervasive; if we're not falling for them like we used to, then that means we're getting smarter as a public.