I-90 Interchange Improvement Project & West Station | Allston

Re: Next meeting & Comment deadline

MassDOT ultimately wants to sell the new parcels created. BRA controls what can be built, hence they have a lot of influence on the ultimate value of the parcels. So it is in MassDOT's interest to play along with the BRA.

BRA is doing this same type of thing with the MassDOT parcels south of the O'Neill Tunnel (Parcels 25, 26, 27). MassDOT is floating the RFP to developers, but BRA has also simultaneously issued a set of design guidelines, signalling what they would expect to approve, or not approve on the sites.

Don't think so, in this case. MassDOT owns an easement on the land, but the actual property owner is Harvard. They're the ones looking to build or sell.

EDIT: Though now that I say that, I'm not sure who owns the land that the actual roadway is currently on. It might be MassDOT. Harvard owns the railyard...
 
Realizing now I don't understand anything about this. Under what framework does the BRA propose a new street grid on top of land that Harvard owns?
 
Re: Next meeting & Comment deadline

Don't think so, in this case. MassDOT owns an easement on the land, but the actual property owner is Harvard. They're the ones looking to build or sell.

EDIT: Though now that I say that, I'm not sure who owns the land that the actual roadway is currently on. It might be MassDOT. Harvard owns the railyard...

I believe these are all the parcels between Cambridge St and BU property, and west of the Charles River.

2200105000 (31 acres) Harvard
2200104000 (42 acres) CSX (Harvard?)
2200103000 (7 acres) Commonwealth
2200102000 400 Soldiers Field Rd (Houghton?)
2200101001 (Houghton)
2200101000 (Houghton)
2200105010 (10 acres) Harvard

2200107010 (1.5 acres) Harvard
2200303000 (12 ares) CSX (Harvard?)
2100396010 Mass Pike almost to BU bridge Harvard

If you go the assessors map, and list the parcel #, the map will outline the parcel. I believe now that CSX has moved its operations west, its land is now Harvard's. Harvard owns the land under the current MassPike. Most of the Commonwealth land is Soldiers Field Rd.

Boston Tax parcel viewer
http://app01.cityofboston.gov/ParcelViewer/?pid=2200301100

^^^ opens to 2200301100
 
Realizing now I don't understand anything about this. Under what framework does the BRA propose a new street grid on top of land that Harvard owns?

The BRA doesn't. MassDOT does, because MassDOT has the unlimited transportation easement on the property. Harvard could build additional roads, or the BRA could get an easement to build city roads, or MassDOT could publicly adopt any BRA recommendations, but right now only MassDOT and Harvard can build roads.
 
^ OK, this is really complicated, then. I am not sure what the exact influence arrangement is.

Does Harvard have a masterplan for the area that the BRA has approved? Perhaps that is the route?
 
It might have been implied by the previous renders. Looking back the only way to keep the grade accessible between the street grid and the bridges over the highway would be to raise the street grid quite a bit. Just didn't realize it was going to be greater than 10' of raised elevation for a significantly large area. Also, on the other side of the tracks the elevation is going to need to be raised significantly, at least for the roads.

Only the roads directly leading to the bridges were elevated before.

meEUzpR.jpg
 
^ OK, this is really complicated, then. I am not sure what the exact influence arrangement is.

Does Harvard have a masterplan for the area that the BRA has approved? Perhaps that is the route?

No. I've predicted before that this site will look like NorthPoint for a long time - MassDOT will build the roads and then they'll sit surrounded by gravel for 20 years because Harvard hasn't gotten around to using the land bank yet.
 
^ OK, this is really complicated, then. I am not sure what the exact influence arrangement is.

Does Harvard have a masterplan for the area that the BRA has approved? Perhaps that is the route?

There is no Institutional Master Plan for Harvard-owned land south of Cambridge St. The current IMP covers development of some of the undeveloped property south of Western Ave., north of Cambridge St. There is nothing on the table for the big area east of Windom, north of Cambridge, except along immediate Western Ave.

Long-term, Harvard has indicated that the property south of Cambridge St will likely be developed with partners, and hinted it might primarily be the site of tech/pharma. And IIRC, Harvard did not rule out other institutions being partners. That said, I doubt Harvard is interested in seeing BU build dorms or athletic fields on its property.
_________________________________

If one looks at the B-school, past five years, they have demolished two large buildings (young buildings as universities go) to build a newer, larger building on the sites. That tells me the B school is land constrained.
 
Monday comment deadline

Comments on the BRA draft report should be submitted to Gerald Autler gerald.autler@boston.gov by the close of business on Monday, July 18th.

Please considering joining a group of residents, advocates, and community organizations in signing a joint letter to Mayor Walsh and Transportation Secretary Pollack thanking the City for their work and urging MassDOT to incorporate the City’s recommendations into the project design.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1...cYJy4pbJfFs7vo0LeWhUJCLkGFZg/viewform?c=0&w=1
 

If you read only the Crimson article, and not Bruce Houghton's subsequent clarifications, one could conclude they were leaving for Scranton PA.

Some of Houghton's Allston operations will move to Scranton, and Harvard will help finance the move. Houghton already has a plant in Scranton.
 
meEUzpR.jpg
[/QUOTE]

Are there no new bridge(s) across the mainline tracks as it appears in the drawing?
 
Correct. BU is being very provincial, and the City is caving to them. Instead of having a real city street grid, we'll have a set of carved up suburban cul-de-sacs.

Another case of Boston acting like a backwater instead of a world class city.
 
Correct. BU is being very provincial, and the City is caving to them. Instead of having a real city street grid, we'll have a set of carved up suburban cul-de-sacs.

Another case of Boston acting like a backwater instead of a world class city.

To be fair, there's significant grade difference between the BU grid and Pike/Beacon Park at the ends of Babcock and Malvern making overpass hookups extremely difficult. You definitely can't do anything with Agganis Way.

To have a bridge incline over the tracks descend onto Babcock, Walter Brown Arena and private 660 Corp. would have to be razed for new development set further back from the street. Malvern would have to take private Consolidated Sterilizer Systems. It would be nice if the final design enables this at some point in the future because those two streets would make a nice one-way pair.

Not that BU aren't unhelpful slackers unwilling to compromise...that charge definitely sticks. But there's a little more messiness to these specific present-day considerations. Especially with those private companies that have held fast from ever selling out their back parcels to BU.
 
If you read only the Crimson article, and not Bruce Houghton's subsequent clarifications, one could conclude they were leaving for Scranton PA.

Some of Houghton's Allston operations will move to Scranton, and Harvard will help finance the move. Houghton already has a plant in Scranton.

That sucks, because Houghton's a relatively significant operation despite the small acreage there. Those technicolor-painted tanks in the back help produce a pretty significant share of the wholesale car antifreeze and windshield wiper fluid market, that then get re-labeled under name-brand retail names. At some point we've all probably refilled our cars with coolant or wiper fluid that was mixed in Allston.

This really isn't a good omen for the City showing any applied learning about light industry's share of the local economy. If "GTFO, icky and unaesthetic industry" mentality chases these guys to Scranton, it's a senseless loss because simply giving a shit about accommodation could've very easily put them in a new location that had the highway and rail access they desired. Very disappointing.

They're already tone-deaf about the ports and have to keep getting reminded by Massport who controls the deepwater areas. They keep proposing utter mixed-use nonsense in the Readville hinterlands, stuff like their make-believe "tech lofts" that no light industrial firm worth any economic salt would ever consider. Basically, if it's not a state-steered economic development zone the City institutions are ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. (Which is maybe why Readville should get redesignated under a state Econ Dev umbrella program...and possibly a couple other small non-Massport land use districts suitable-to-task). You can't have am entirely net-zero industrial or shipping economy in City of Boston without the imbalance in distribution of economic sectors exerting its drag effect over time. It's small-potatoes, but still a necessary one requiring some semblance of a plan and place in the proceedings.



Only other thing to note is that if Houghton's signed-off on ending rail service CSX now has the all-clear to cut a haulage deal with Pan Am for its Everett Terminal customers and cut the daily freight job over the Grand Junction. Something it has probably wanted to do for awhile to trim crew costs out in Framingham, but couldn't do because Houghton had to be served couple times a week by them only. Under a haulage deal Pan Am can tack the refrigerator cars of fresh produce onto the back of its Everett daily, take them up the Lowell Line, hand off to one of their Ayer-Worcester trains, hand off in Worcester to the CSX Framingham-Worcester daily that handles local customers, and distribute the produce at Framingham Yard per usual. The funky routing ends up working for the task because it hides these carloads inside 100% preexisting freight schedules.

New England Produce Center still remains a CSX customer, CSX is still free to seek new customers in Everett, and CSX is free to take back that job for itself if it sees fit. But as long as Pan Am is punctual with its deliveries and lives up to the terms of the haulage agreement, they won't need to run that Grand Junction daily to hit their own customers and save money, while Pan Am pockets a little free money on the side. For the T, it ends all Worcester Line freight inbound of Framingham, all Grand Junction freight, and relieves the space crunch at BET (which GLX is crunching even further) with one fewer freight that has to lay over on the wrap-around tracks between commuter rail slots. Saves a few pennies on maintenance to not have freight beating up the rails, saves a little aggravation for northside dispatch to remove one third-party schedule stressor, and slightly widens future passenger considerations on the Grand Junction.

Watch for that deal to get inked some months or year-plus after Houghton's rail contract expires. Though it would've been a happier ending if Houghton got relocated across town instead of scared away.
 
Correct. BU is being very provincial, and the City is caving to them. Instead of having a real city street grid, we'll have a set of carved up suburban cul-de-sacs.

Another case of Boston acting like a backwater instead of a world class city.

Bikes, pedestrians, etc will be able to cross - so it's not exactly a suburban cul-de-sac. If you really think about it, this adds a major catchment area onto the B Line. Would've been nice for buses, and to relieve auto congestion on Harvard Ave/Cambridge Street, but so it goes (for the reasons, I suppose, that F Line mentioned)
 
That sucks, because Houghton's a relatively significant operation despite the small acreage there. Those technicolor-painted tanks in the back help produce a pretty significant share of the wholesale car antifreeze and windshield wiper fluid market, that then get re-labeled under name-brand retail names. At some point we've all probably refilled our cars with coolant or wiper fluid that was mixed in Allston.

This really isn't a good omen for the City showing any applied learning about light industry's share of the local economy. If "GTFO, icky and unaesthetic industry" mentality chases these guys to Scranton, it's a senseless loss because simply giving a shit about accommodation could've very easily put them in a new location that had the highway and rail access they desired. Very disappointing.
Looking at Houghton's existing plant in Scranton, not on a spur. But a 1000 feet away, there is a large parcel on a spur, and whatever was on the parcel was demolished and cleared. Right at an Interstate interchange as well.

Houghton has facilities in NJ, Scranton, Pittsburgh, two in Illinois, and two on the West Coast. My guess is that the HQ, the administrative functions, and the research function remains in Allston, and perhaps small batch or specialty product manufacturing.
 
Correct. BU is being very provincial, and the City is caving to them.

The City is not caving on this. MassDOT is expected to reply to this BRA study on October 13th, at 6:30PM at the Charlesview Fiorentino Center, 123 Antwerp Street Brighton. Come join us and support good design!

http://www.bostonredevelopmentauthority.org/getattachment/86b8c43b-799b-4415-9927-b62d3f501fc0

"Provide a north/south transit link for buses and shuttles between the North Allston/Harvard Area, West Station, and areas to the east and south, including Kendall Square and the Longwood Medical Area.**

Buses and shuttles should not terminate their routes at West Station, but should be able to continue across the I-90 and rail alignment. The project should establish feasible ways to accomplish this north/south link by evaluating potential routes and alignments."
 
That sucks, because Houghton's a relatively significant operation despite the small acreage there. Those technicolor-painted tanks in the back help produce a pretty significant share of the wholesale car antifreeze and windshield wiper fluid market, that then get re-labeled under name-brand retail names. At some point we've all probably refilled our cars with coolant or wiper fluid that was mixed in Allston.

This really isn't a good omen for the City showing any applied learning about light industry's share of the local economy. If "GTFO, icky and unaesthetic industry" mentality chases these guys to Scranton, it's a senseless loss...

They're already tone-deaf about the ports and have to keep getting reminded by Massport who controls the deepwater areas.

F-Line -- if anything, other than lack of space to expand, its the rediculous cost of: energy and environmental regulation imposed on us by the Green Mafia

The result of all of the extra costs is that only three types of "Blue-ish Collar" Industry can survive here [with exception of HQ and R&D facilities]:
  • High product value -- e.g. Pharma
  • stuff that has to be local -- e.g. Ready Mix Concrete
  • stuff which people are willing to pay a premium for -- e.g. Beer & locally grown and packaged fruits and vegetables

The rest are just hanging on on borrowed time, or family business stubbornness -- the local manufacturing diaspora will continue until the public sees the Greenies for who they are -- modern version of Luddites

Meanwhile the high costs are only a marginal factor compared to the local Research U's value for the R&D-centric industries who are queuing-up to move their facilities to Kendall -- e.g. recent Immigrant Companies [last 24 months]:
  • Phillips
  • Shell
  • Eli Lilly
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • IBM Watson
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Baxalta
 

Back
Top