Sorry if this is a stupid question, but can somebody explain to me the economic differences in building a luxury condo building vs luxury apartments? From what I can gather developers would rather have a luxury rental building, provided they can fill the units which doesn't always happen. When it comes to condos however, they will always be bought. I'm guessing developers prefer the rentals because they can profit continuously into the future as opposed to condos being a one time sale.
What I'm mostly wondering is what's better for the city's housing market, or does it even matter? It seems to me if condos are being snatched up, than that's what would be best for the city as it's where the demand is, and by trying to sell "luxury rentals" developers are just trying to squeeze as much out of they can out of their investment (ie being greedy). On the other hand, if the condos are just being bought out by foreign investors who don't live here or just rent out their place for similar obscene prices, that's not really helping the city either.